Explore the BBC
www.autosport.com/news/repor... Now it's confirmed that Red Bull have the quickest car (again) there is no reason (besides reliability) why Vettel (or even Webber) shouldn't win the championship.
view all 70 comments
posted Mar 21, 2010
It's true. Spelling was always a weak point in school for me.So I apolgize for misspelling ridicule or it's derivatives.
add comment |
complain about this comment
Incubus (U14121542)You beat me to it.All browsers have a spell checker, don't they?What is RITC basic level of schooling?Truly Laugable (sic), I never lauged (sick) so much in my life.
Apology not good enough, Ray. Only lines will do.Write it a hundred times or it's detention time for you. And stop chewing gum in the classroom please.
LHetc (U14184561)posted 16 Minutes AgoAll browsers have a spell checker, don't they?-----They do?Mine's not an English browser...can you help?
RITC - Firefox.You can choose your dictionary.
Thank you, LHetc!
posted Mar 22, 2010
Well if you're using more fuel you can go faster. When it runs out you go slower. Didn't that happen to Vettel. This is a take off Ron Dennis thoughts on Bahrain. Seems to add up.Hamilton finished in front of Vettel which some writers have failed to notice.
# LHetc (U14184561)You seem to be having some problems with your grammar. People in glass house, etc, etc.Anyway, what's spelling got to do with this? Are you OCD or something?
That's what I like about these chat vrooms - the range of topics sliding effortlessly from double diffusers via fuel consumption to spell checkers and browsers.Do Red Bull use a Ferrari engine or a Merc?I believe if Vettel does not win the title this year, he'll have it next year. It looks like a cracking season already...Good luck to ALL drivers
Just discovered it for myself - Renault engines for Red Bull. Let's see what abuse is coming my (ignorant) way...
average rating:1.80 from 10 votes