posted Dec 3, 2009

Ballack missing a penalty

What were the chances of that...

What a pelican

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 3, 2009

comment by Florent Malouda's Hairdresser (U13931488)

posted 12 Hours Ago

CITY WIL TOPPPLE U LOT ON THE WEEKEND lol

-------------------------------------------------

Doubt it - but one things for sure, whoever wins wont need Fergietime like your lot did!

- How was it fegie time when the goal was within the alloted time?

Also during this fabled fergie time. The other team can go on the attack rather than what chelsea did against barcelona over 180 minutes

Parking the bus.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 3, 2009

comment by FranMerida (U5985836)
posted 14 Hours Ago

comment by SirAlex_the_great (U13915073)
posted Just Now

HAHAHAHA CHELSEA OUT ON PENS AGAIN THEIR SO TERRIBLE AT PENS AND IT WAS KAKUTA WHO MISSED looks like it us with the better season atm =]

-----------------------------------------------

If we're terrible what are you who we beat on pens? HAHAHA!!!!!

_______________________

did you not watch the 2008 champions league final, or have you only just become a chelsea fan?

-------------------------

Yeah I do, I remember United's old golden boy had his saved while Terry happened to slip and miss his.

But in the last penalty shoot-out between us and United (which also happened to be their last one) we beat them. And they lost the one before that in a pre-season friendly. And they lost the one before that in the FA Cup semi-final against Everton.

Don't you remember that or did you just get into football?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 3, 2009

comment by barca4ever (U2142799)
posted 14 Hours Ago

were are the Chelsea fans? I guess you wished that the FIFA ban stayed. Chelsea have not won anything yet.

-------------------------

Rather ironic that comment considering two Chelsea fans commenetd just before and after you.

Which Chelsea fan wouldn't be happy the wrongly awarded ban was lifted? We get to sign in January and we have our great young prospect back. Who cares he missed the penalty? The biggest players in the world have missed penalties in the times when it actually mattered.

He's just 18 and he missed one in the beer cup. He'll get over in no time and it's better to experience some disappointment now and know what it feels like so that he can know how to handle it in the future.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 3, 2009

comment by ABC = Anderson Basso Carrick IRUT (U7714795)
posted 2 Hours Ago

comment by Florent Malouda's Hairdresser (U13931488)

posted 12 Hours Ago

CITY WIL TOPPPLE U LOT ON THE WEEKEND lol

-------------------------------------------------

Doubt it - but one things for sure, whoever wins wont need Fergietime like your lot did!

- How was it fegie time when the goal was within the alloted time?

Also during this fabled fergie time. The other team can go on the attack rather than what chelsea did against barcelona over 180 minutes

Parking the bus.

-------------------------

It was worked out that you lot scored just after the alloted time had elapsed.

Fergie time wins it for you again.

And against Barca, it was us who had both more and better chances. They had ONE shot on target right at the end which happened to be the equaliser.

Remind me what it was that United done when the went to the Camp Nou? Oh that's right park the bus and have four different playerz marking Messi each and every time he got the ball. United fans said those were great tactics deployed by SAF.

Then after they take the lead back at the swamp they park the bus again.

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 3, 2009

comment by John Alpha Daniels (U14207645)

posted 1 Hour Ago

comment by ABC = Anderson Basso Carrick IRUT (U7714795)
posted 2 Hours Ago

comment by Florent Malouda's Hairdresser (U13931488)

posted 12 Hours Ago

CITY WIL TOPPPLE U LOT ON THE WEEKEND lol

-------------------------------------------------

Doubt it - but one things for sure, whoever wins wont need Fergietime like your lot did!

- How was it fegie time when the goal was within the alloted time?

Also during this fabled fergie time. The other team can go on the attack rather than what chelsea did against barcelona over 180 minutes

Parking the bus.

-------------------------

It was worked out that you lot scored just after the alloted time had elapsed.

Fergie time wins it for you again.

And against Barca, it was us who had both more and better chances. They had ONE shot on target right at the end which happened to be the equaliser.

Remind me what it was that United done when the went to the Camp Nou? Oh that's right park the bus and have four different playerz marking Messi each and every time he got the ball. United fans said those were great tactics deployed by SAF.

Then after they take the lead back at the swamp they park the bus again.

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black doh
_____________________

WRONG - The 'Fergie Time' goal WAS PROVEN TO BE GIVEN CORRECT

48:21 – 49:08 United goal (2-1): add 45 seconds
51:38 – 52:26 City goal (2-2): add 45 seconds
61:06 – 61:40 United sub: add 30 seconds
77:00 – 77:30 United sub: add 30 seconds
80:00 – 80:51 United goal (3-2): add 45 seconds
81:59 – 82:27 City sub add: add 30 seconds

That is 3:45 in extra time added just between goals and subs, so 4 minutes seems perfectly legit when you add in any other stoppages like United time wasting when they went up 3-2. So now we get to the extra time added during stoppage time.

89:55 – 90:52 City goal (3-3): add 1 minute
92:21 – 92:50 United sub: add 30 seconds

-------------

As for the CL Final against Barca - yeh we got beaten deservedly but we went for it right from the start and were unlucky not to have been up in the first 10 mins. If Eto didnt score that goal it would have been a completely different game.

Still being impartial that ref you had for the SF - I still laugh at how bad he was!

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 3, 2009

It was worked out that you lot scored just after the alloted time had elapsed.

- It also found that it was inside the time. So i think we'll have to agree to disagree.

Fergie time wins it for you again.

- Other teams can score in the alloted time too why do other fans struggle to understand? Oh i forgot tinted glasses are all the fashion in london.

And against Barca, it was us who had both more and better chances.

- i thought it was equal.

They had ONE shot on target right at the end which happened to be the equaliser.

- Yet it was chelsea that put the whole team behind the ball.

Remind me what it was that United done when the went to the Camp Nou?

- Attacked and defended. Chelsea defended for the whole match. You wonder why Chelsea got a stick for that and not United? I think there is a big difference between the two.

Oh that's right park the bus and have four different playerz marking Messi each and every time he got the ball. United fans said those were great tactics deployed by SAF.

- Four? talking of making things up.

Then after they take the lead back at the swamp they park the bus again.

- Oh yea for twenty minutes. A slight difference to the 80 minutes at chelsea

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black

- Saying a chelsea fan. a fan of a team widely known for putting ten men behind the ball in europe.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 3, 2009

comment by ABC = Anderson Basso Carrick IRUT (U7714795)
posted 48 Minutes Ago

-------------------------

"- Other teams can score in the alloted time too why do other fans struggle to understand? Oh i forgot tinted glasses are all the fashion in london."

True but if a top team is drawing at home to a team they expect to beat and they've just conceded in the 90th minute it's obvious that they would be the only ones attacking and the other team would be the one defending until the end.

"- Yet it was chelsea that put the whole team behind the ball."

So how did we manage to have four times as many attempts on goal than them if we had the whole team behind the ball? How was it that we had four penalties not given and another two debatable ones also denied if we had the whole team behind the ball? How was it that we managed to score with the whole team behind the ball?

"- Attacked and defended. Chelsea defended for the whole match. You wonder why Chelsea got a stick for that and not United? I think there is a big difference between the two."

Yet you had 1 shot on target to Barca's 6. Yet you had 27% possession in the whole match to Barca's 73%. In fact they beat you on every aspect in that match. Your attacking that night was next to none so it's pointless in trying to argue that.

"- Four? talking of making things up."

Believe me at one point I saw Vidic, Evra, Hargreaves and Scholes all closing down on Messi., with two going in for a tackle.

"- Oh yea for twenty minutes. A slight difference to the 80 minutes at chelsea"

I'm beginning to think you didn't even watch the Chelsea-Barca game. You seem completely clueless on it.

"- Saying a chelsea fan. a fan of a team widely known for putting ten men behind the ball in europe."

Chelsea 1-0 Poto
Apoel 0-1 Chelsea
Chelsea 4-0 Atletico
Atletico 2-2 Chelsea
Porto 0-1 CHelsea

Goals in all our games, including a 4-0 thrashing, two away wins and four away goals. yeah, so much for us being known as putting 10 men behind the ball in Europe.

Do you even know who Chelsea is? Or are you maybe mixing them up with another club? Maybe you're even mixing your own team up with another club.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 3, 2009

comment by John Alpha Daniels (U14207645)

posted 24 Minutes Ago

comment by ABC = Anderson Basso Carrick IRUT (U7714795)
posted 48 Minutes Ago

-------------------------

"- Other teams can score in the alloted time too why do other fans struggle to understand? Oh i forgot tinted glasses are all the fashion in london."

True but if a top team is drawing at home to a team they expect to beat and they've just conceded in the 90th minute it's obvious that they would be the only ones attacking and the other team would be the one defending until the end.

- And you call me clueless If the team wants to defend thats there problem. United stilla ttack thats why they score.

"- Yet it was chelsea that put the whole team behind the ball."

So how did we manage to have four times as many attempts on goal than them if we had the whole team behind the ball? How was it that we had four penalties not given and another two debatable ones also denied if we had the whole team behind the ball? How was it that we managed to score with the whole team behind the ball?

- What was Barcas possession %? I suspect its much higher. Thus showing chelsea spend alot o team behind the ball.

"- Attacked and defended. Chelsea defended for the whole match. You wonder why Chelsea got a stick for that and not United? I think there is a big difference between the two."

Yet you had 1 shot on target to Barca's 6. Yet you had 27% possession in the whole match to Barca's 73%. In fact they beat you on every aspect in that match.

- Did they a remember not lsoing to them

Your attacking that night was next to none so it's pointless in trying to argue that.

- Next to none? SHows how much of that match you watched.. hardly any.

"- Four? talking of making things up."

Believe me at one point I saw Vidic, Evra, Hargreaves and Scholes all closing down on Messi., with two going in for a tackle.

- Yea and chelsea weren't behind the ball at camp nou.

"- Oh yea for twenty minutes. A slight difference to the 80 minutes at chelsea"

I'm beginning to think you didn't even watch the Chelsea-Barca game. You seem completely clueless on it.

- I did see the game. Not clueless. Chelsea were behind the ball for most of the match.

"- Saying a chelsea fan. a fan of a team widely known for putting ten men behind the ball in europe."

Chelsea 1-0 Poto
Apoel 0-1 Chelsea
Chelsea 4-0 Atletico
Atletico 2-2 Chelsea
Porto 0-1 CHelsea


Goals in all our games, including a 4-0 thrashing,

- against one of the worse teams in la liga

two away wins and four away goals. yeah, so much for us being known as putting 10 men behind the ball in Europe.

- I said thye were known for it. Not all the time. your a bit clueless.

Do you even know who Chelsea is?

- Yes. Otherwise i wont be discussing it

Or are you maybe mixing them up with another club? Maybe you're even mixing your own team up with another club.

- I think you confused..

add comment | complain about this comment