BBC Home

Explore the BBC

Browse: Rugby league

17 comments

user rating: not rated yet

Still no half back

by Bigbambino (U14147784) 14 November 2009
comment on the article

Eastmond and tomkins play schoolyard rugby. A halfback is supposed to kick and control the game not skip here and there and expect to break the line. You can afford one player like that not two.

Latest 10 comments

Read members' comments or add your own

posted Nov 15, 2009

Eastmond is no half back.

Mad bull mick,open your eyes.

Again playing to instructions Eastmond occupied the right centre position,the only time he was at scrum half was when he fed the scrum.If he is picked at No.7 then he should be allowed to play at No7.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Nov 15, 2009

Oh, I must have missed Chris Bridge playing right centre all game. Open your eyes indeed.

Daft lad.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Nov 15, 2009

eastmond IS a halfback and him and tomkins are the best option we have. hopefully they will be kept as a halfback pairing for the next few years, then we might see the level of cohesion that lockyer and thurston have as lockyer has been their number 7 for years. we've had 14 different halfback combinations or something like that for GB / England.

and how do you figure that roby is only a one trick pony? he's a hooker and is meant to pass the ball to people! sinfield shouldn't have been at hooker either, he played well but is better at loose.

the team played fantastically well last night but ran out of steam.
the game against NZ took it out of them i thought whilst the aussies had a nice rest and run out against france.
i think the team did so well and that is the closest we have ever come to beating them in a final in such a long time. the futures bright i say!

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Nov 15, 2009

would you have created this debate had we won the match?
because with less than half hour left we were einning and matching them in every way!!!
tomkins had the tournament of his life and can only get better.
eastmond justified his selection against new zealand and early in the final

can i just say though....why wasnt maguire on the bench, why does smith like to make examples of players and drop them completely????

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Nov 15, 2009

1 trick Roby. Lets scoot.

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by Kubali (U13723610)

posted Nov 15, 2009

'would you have created this debate had we won the match?
because with less than half hour left we were einning and matching them in every way!!!'

The debate is entirely justified because England were absolutely annihilated in the last 20 minutes. The Aussies are great but that does not excuse England from being torn to shreads.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Nov 15, 2009

Danny Brough...



whistle

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by David (U13898307)

posted Nov 15, 2009

England matched Australia for 60 minutes and I honestly think credit should be given for that.

British Rugby League cannot compete with Australian rugby league. The NRL is financially light years ahead of SuperLeague and because of that they have the pick of the talent.

I don't think most people realise how big the NRL actually is in Australia. It's as big as Premiership football in England, it's at that level. We wouldn't expect a small country to beat England at football. In rugby league terms England is a small country.

We're getting closer but not close enough.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Nov 15, 2009

Last nights game wes thoroughly entertaining to watch. It makes me laugh when i read some comments on here from sad rugby union supporters havind a dig our game, what a load of rubbish that game is, incredibly boring.
Looks like Darren Lockyer may be coming towards the end of his career, he has been a great player.
I thought England played well last night, but the Australian team have so many matchwinners.
Maybe you people from England can see how hard it is for us here in NSW to beat Qld at the moment in state of origin each year.
With blokes like Smith Lockyer,Thurston,Inglis,Hodges,Folau,Slater coming at us each year.
But i have to say is is very good to watch.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Nov 16, 2009

Eastmond at full back might be an option, let him get to know the game at that level a bit. The aussies did it with Lockyer and it hasn't done him any harm.

I thought the boys did well though, considering the inexperience in our back line. Look on the bright side lads, we could be union fans, I wouldn't give a bucket of P&$* for their future!!

Also look at the facts, we beat the world champs and ran the aussies bloody close for 120 minutes of the 160, its better than this time last year now lets kick on.

add comment | complain about this comment

Comment on this article

Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.

RATE THIS ARTICLE

Rate Breakdown

  • 5
    0 votes
  • 4
    0 votes
  • 3
    0 votes
  • 2
    0 votes
  • 1
    0 votes

average rating:
0 from 0 votes