Murray is good..but not great!Wimbledon by U10891573 04 July 2009 I for one am very pleased that this Murray hype is done and dusted for another year. Latest 10 commentsRead members' comments or add your own
comment by
Tom (U2600703) posted Jul 4, 2009 Nadal does have a 7-2 H2H, but Murray has begun to start turning those early defeats around and has done well against Nadal in the past 12 months.
comment by
livershrew (U13437699) posted Jul 4, 2009 i have read many of your articles over the last few weeks, and they have been utter tripe.
comment by
Tom (U2600703) posted Jul 4, 2009 But that's the thing BTaT, the media hype him up to win A slam, not be the next Federer!
comment by
1Wattie (U11221085) posted Jul 4, 2009 Blue_Thru_and_Thru
comment by
bjorky35 (U14058970) posted Jul 4, 2009 who cares if murray wins, i would rather watch paint dry, is is so boring
comment by
The Dude Abides (U13883475) posted Jul 4, 2009 Like I said, I'm putting Murray down to win 2-4 Majors by the end of his career - and I stick by that prediction.
comment by
U10891573
comment by
The Dude Abides (U13883475) posted Sep 9, 2009 i think i said USO 09 was Murray's best chance of winning a slam. And now it may have gone.
comment by
Chanterman (U13904433) posted Sep 9, 2009 As a Scot myself Murray is not in the same class as the greats like Laver / Borg / McEnroe / Becker /Sampras / Connors / Federer these were 1st class id put Nadal in with them once he proves himself over more yrs
comment by
The Dude Abides (U13883475) posted Sep 11, 2009 id put Nadal in with them once he proves himself over more yrs Comment on this article |