£100k for Camp is a decent dealQPR by David McIntyre - BBC Sport (U1628513) 03 July 2009 ![]() Rangers have sold Lee Camp to Nottingham Forest for an initial fee of just £100,000 and believe it or not, it makes financial sense. Latest 10 commentsRead members' comments or add your own
comment by
MaccaQPR (U12788895) posted Jul 3, 2009 Good luck to the guy...he served Rangers well and is a good keeper. Any youngsters coming through who could step up maybe?
comment by
QPR4Me (U1749134) posted Jul 3, 2009 David,
comment by
QPR4Me (U1749134) posted Jul 3, 2009 Sorry, forgot to add that Camp is too short to be taken seriously as a top class keeper.
comment by
forestfever316 (U13789615)
comment by
WBA2QPR3 (U7816349) posted Jul 4, 2009 Dave - Sadly your articles hold less value with each one you write at the moment - you sound like the official club PR machine yourself.
comment by
kandypopper (U11247442) posted Jul 4, 2009 david = i have to agree with WBA - whilst i can see the viewpoint of the "cut the massive wages" £100k for a quality keeper is poor business. i think that the virtues of this and the delaney transfers (who seems we paid over the odds for in the first place) will need to put up against what we do next. If we do naff all then i am sorely worried about the future of our club
comment by
Belfasthoop (U14018346) posted Jul 4, 2009 Maybe there is an actual plan here going on in the background, although at times I wonder.Perhaps if the offish weren't just as secretive about what that plan is, we would all be happier. What's wrong with the club, for example ,stating, "yes, we're currently looking for a striker " - they don't have to give details that might jepardise the deal but equally , getting information about anything is like getting blood from a stone at the minute.
comment by
Ashdown_Ranger (U7573125) posted Jul 4, 2009 Belfast - "...we have a few brands in the fire"
comment by
haydenqpr (U12644197) posted Jul 4, 2009 I must say I'm shocked by the responses to this article; they seem unnecessarily harsh. DM is clearly making the financial argument for the transfer not the footballing one. He certainly not talking ‘carp’ as QPR4Me said. This is officially an ‘undisclosed fee’ so this level of detail is very enlightening even if you do not agree with the editorial conclusions he draws.
comment by
ViewFromThePaddock (U5753014) posted Jul 7, 2009 I despair when I read articles like this. Like DavidM I share the belief that Camp is the better of the two keepers on our books. Regardless of this, it is a simple fact that Camp is the only one with age on his side and the potential to develop. Let's not forget, Lee Camp has already excelled with QPR - he was the keeper who got us into this division, saved us from relegation, and gave Martin Rowlands a run for Player of the Year in 2008. To lose him for such a tiny fee - or indeed anywhere near his market value - is a sad day for QPR. Comment on this article
Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.
|