BBC Home

Explore the BBC

New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in
Browse: Football QPR

17 comments

user rating: 4 star

£100k for Camp is a decent deal

comment on the article

Rangers have sold Lee Camp to Nottingham Forest for an initial fee of just £100,000 and believe it or not, it makes financial sense.

The Camp v Cerny debate has been done to death.

My view always was, and still is, that despite being somewhat overrated by QPR fans, Camp is by far the better of the two keepers and should be playing instead of Cerny.

That’s very much a minority view, such has been Cerny’s success in turning opinions his way after a shaky start.

But forget all that. In purely financial terms, the deal for Camp is a decent one for Rangers – however bad it may seem on the surface.

The initial fee, followed by an additional sum in January plus two more payments based on appearances, mean Rangers should recoup at least £200,000 for Camp and maybe end up with closer to £300,000.

That’s less than Rangers paid Derby for him and, I believe, significantly less than he is worth.

But in real terms a player is only worth what someone will pay for him, and Forest’s was the best offer on the table.

Camp was simply not going to play for QPR this season.

Given that, and the absence of better offers, at some point it pays to cut your losses and do business, which is what Rangers have done.

The alternative was to have a high-earning player sitting on the bench, which would have made no financial sense whatsoever.

Doing this deal with Forest means that beyond the small transfer fee, there is also an overall annual saving.

Yes, it could potentially leave Rangers without adequate cover for Cerny.

But that’s a football issue. In purely financial terms, the club have done the right thing.

Camp had to go and while Forest have got themselves a bargain, Rangers got the best deal possible.

No-one has been more critical of Gianni Paladini than me, but when it comes to Lee Camp he hasn’t done too badly.

Camp’s name is rarely mentioned on the dreaded list of ‘Paladini signings’ but it was very much his.

With John Gregory’s position weak after a 5-0 mauling at Southend early in 2007, Paladini went from encouraging the re-signing of Camp on loan from Derby to insisting upon it.

Camp was a popular arrival and was later signed for a reasonable price – around £350,000.

And after Camp fell out of favour with the top brass at Loftus Road, the deal Paladini has done to get him out of the building is, in all fairness, not a bad one in the circumstances.

A much bigger fee for Camp was agreed last season when he departed on an initial loan deal but Forest opted not to go ahead with the signing, which was their right.

Now the transfer fee looks shockingly low, but the alternative was sheer financial lunacy.

Blame lies with Paladini and QPR not so much for the fee, but for creating unrealistic expectations among fans over transfer fees in general.

Barely a week has gone by in recent years without some story or rumour emanating from the club – usually taken as fact by readers – that bids have been turned down for this player or that, when actual bids for QPR players are in fact very rare indeed.

It creates discussion among supporters, many of whom will be impressed and/or grateful that interest in their favourite players is being fought off.

But it’s a short-term gimmick that almost always comes back to haunt the club.

It happened with Dan Shittu and especially in the case of Lee Cook, who for months was supposedly the subject of multi-million-pound bids from various clubs which were all repelled by your glorious board.

But when Cook wanted to go and in any case needed to be sold to balance the books, only Fulham were seriously interested and Rangers spent the summer trying to cobble a deal together.

Those who’d been led to believe Cook would fetch more cash were left disappointed.

More recently, the kind of money Rangers are rumoured to be getting for Dexter Blackstock bears no resemblance to what Forest would pay for him, and the same applied to Camp.

This creates a delusional view of what QPR players – and indeed most Championship players – are worth.

This also affects how incoming transfers are perceived, with many fans seeming to think fees ranging from £500,000 to £1m somehow don’t count, and show the owners are not willing to spend big money.

A couple of hundred grand for Camp isn’t ideal, but it isn’t to be sniffed at either.

In the circumstances, it’s a realistic fee and a decent bit of business.

Latest 10 comments

Read members' comments or add your own

posted Jul 3, 2009

Good luck to the guy...he served Rangers well and is a good keeper. Any youngsters coming through who could step up maybe?

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by QPR4Me (U1749134)

posted Jul 3, 2009

David,

I tend to read your articles whilst taking a large pinch of salt and usually don't bother to reply.

This time, is an exception. You are talking total carp out of your journalistic backside!

A week or so ago, everyone slaughtered Joe Hart for his inability to commande his penalty box, while staying super-glued to his line when playing for England's U21s. You come on here and claim that Camp is a better keeper than Cerny without realising that Camp makes Hart look brave.

Camp cannot and never will command a penalty - box, a good shot-stopper yes, but anything else that is needed in a quality keeper? Never.

While Cerny will never be good enough for the PL, he is light years ahead of Camp. Take it from an ex-keeper who knows what it means to go in where it hurts!!

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by QPR4Me (U1749134)

posted Jul 3, 2009

Sorry, forgot to add that Camp is too short to be taken seriously as a top class keeper.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 4, 2009

Dave - Sadly your articles hold less value with each one you write at the moment - you sound like the official club PR machine yourself.

£100k for Camp is poor business.

Yes I advocated getting rid of Rehman & Bolder to clear the decks but this is an ex England player and much sought after and is therefore an asset worth more than he's been sold for - what will he be worth to us when Cerny takes an injury?

The climate at LR is one of a 'bit of side fun for the owners'. In good times yeah they'll throw a few quid at it but when times are bad like they are now and Mittal / Bernie & Flav are losing money they evidently don't want to throw money about. I can't blame them, I'm doing the same at home.

It strikes me the Camp sale is part of a massive clear out and much much cheaper players will be coming in on lower wages and that is a gamble depending solely I believe on JM getting us up on sheer grit and team spirit - something not seen at the Bush since Ollies 'sticky-back plastic' squad overachieved us out of Division 3.

Tough season for us ahead I think.

I'm not being negative, far from it. I believe its realistic to cut your cloth accordingly and we are very much on a par with Reading / Watford who are also having to throttle back and basically - hope for the best.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 4, 2009

david = i have to agree with WBA - whilst i can see the viewpoint of the "cut the massive wages" £100k for a quality keeper is poor business. i think that the virtues of this and the delaney transfers (who seems we paid over the odds for in the first place) will need to put up against what we do next. If we do naff all then i am sorely worried about the future of our club

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 4, 2009

Maybe there is an actual plan here going on in the background, although at times I wonder.Perhaps if the offish weren't just as secretive about what that plan is, we would all be happier. What's wrong with the club, for example ,stating, "yes, we're currently looking for a striker " - they don't have to give details that might jepardise the deal but equally , getting information about anything is like getting blood from a stone at the minute.

Are we looking at getting a replacement keeper, full back cover etc.I don't agree with DM's assessment of Camp either for the same reason's as QPR4me but what indeed if cerny get's an injury?

Madge was quoted earlier this week on Vital I think as saying "we have a few brand's in the fire" - I , for one hope so or else we can look forward to another season of what might have been.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 4, 2009

Belfast - "...we have a few brands in the fire"
---------------------------------------------------------

Just heard we're going sign Jo Brand. Oh well, at least the quality of the half time entertainment will improve...

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 4, 2009

I must say I'm shocked by the responses to this article; they seem unnecessarily harsh. DM is clearly making the financial argument for the transfer not the footballing one. He certainly not talking ‘carp’ as QPR4Me said. This is officially an ‘undisclosed fee’ so this level of detail is very enlightening even if you do not agree with the editorial conclusions he draws.

As with DM I think Paladini has done pretty well here. He has maximised a return for the club freeing up budget for other signings. From my limited understanding Camp never had a problem with Paladini and if anything he was more sympathetic to Camp’s position than others at LR. It would appear on the surface that Camp fell out with the board and Ian Dowie, despite our turnover of managers last season which often mends these types of rifts I don’t think the relationship ever fully recovered.

I was rather shocked and a tad annoyed when Cerny ran out onto the pitch for the first game of the last season. Camp had probably been our best player the previous season. Cerny had been playing in the premiership the previous season so on balance the decision didn’t seem so ridiculous. I think the feeling around LR was that Cerny will slip up, as all players do, and Camp would get his chance and keep the jersey when he did.

Unfortunately stories emanating from the club seemed to suggest that Cerny had been guaranteed 1st team football when he signed so ID was put under pressure to play him. From that point on Camp seemed to lose heart, quite understandably in my opinion, and his exit was the inevitable conclusion.

It is very sad. Camp was one of the main reasons we got promoted from League One and I don’t think he was treated anywhere near fairly.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 7, 2009

I despair when I read articles like this. Like DavidM I share the belief that Camp is the better of the two keepers on our books. Regardless of this, it is a simple fact that Camp is the only one with age on his side and the potential to develop. Let's not forget, Lee Camp has already excelled with QPR - he was the keeper who got us into this division, saved us from relegation, and gave Martin Rowlands a run for Player of the Year in 2008. To lose him for such a tiny fee - or indeed anywhere near his market value - is a sad day for QPR.

But what's even sadder is the single, simple line in DavidM's article:

"Camp was simply not going to play for QPR this season."

Let's analyse that. Why? We have just appointed a manager - not a head coach, but a single man supposedly solely responsible for all team affairs. This new manager has never been in charge of either keeper, never seen them train, never compared like-for-like in action. Yet we're being told that Camp was never going to be given the chance to impress.

That to me suggests decisions are still being made by the wrong people. And that's what's wrong at QPR.

add comment | complain about this comment

Comment on this article

Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.

RATE THIS ARTICLE

Rate Breakdown

  • 5 57.14%
    4 votes
  • 4 14.29%
    1 votes
  • 3
    0 votes
  • 2
    0 votes
  • 1 28.57%
    2 votes

average rating:
3.71 from 7 votes