BBC Home

Explore the BBC

New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in

7 comments

user rating: 4 star

Welcome back Mark & Matthew ;)

UK Championship
by Mantorok (U1717141) 15 December 2008
comment on the article

Just wanted to say how nice it is to see Williams and Stevens becoming competitive again in the sport. These are class-act players who play fluently and can battle when needed, with Higgins showing some form and Ronnie occasionally flashing some genius it's a great time for Snooker.

Murphy and Selby are great players and all but these guys at their best just blow them out of the water.

Anyone agree..?

Latest comments

Read members' comments or add your own

posted Dec 15, 2008

I was never a fan of Mark J Williams but he's starting to grow on me (I understand now why oneball2 is an admirer). A bit like Davis did a few years ago, grow on me, I mean.

Davis is the (old man) Clint Eastwood of snooker, and Williams is a younger version!

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 15, 2008

CornishStrayCat (U13739754) Are you passing it around then ? laugh

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 15, 2008

'I was in the British Army for 17 yrs and then a further 7 yrs'

er... you mean 24 years? LOL. Don't tell me it was The Light Infantry...?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 15, 2008

Well Murphy played amazingly well for a period of 18 months or so but I think is the 2000s version of Joe Johnson.

Selby I think is the 2000s version of Jimmy White. He'll be the 'nearly man' of snooker and never win a world championship.

Williams and Higgins have both won it twice which puts them in an elite club with the continuously overrated Alex Higgins.

Hendry remains the king for the moment but Davis in his prime matched him. People seem to base Hendry winning 7 WCs to Davis's 6 as CLEAR proof of superiority, yet only a black ball prevented Davis from winning 7, and only a pink prevented Hendry losing to White! I know sport is about 'ifs' but you can't tell me one can say Hendry is clearly greater because of one extra win. It's very close. See UK final in early 1990s, both players at their prime, probably the only time they met in that vain, went to a decider, Hendry just won!

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 15, 2008

Don't know who or what 'steviehullyyy' is, but he clearly has a big (or perhaps small, if you get my drift) problem. Sir Alex Higgins was simply the most talented player of all time. Of course, his trophies don't show it, but he was a natural, a fallible human being, and not a metronome like dreary Davis and spotty Hendry

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 16, 2008

It's a real shame Burnett appears to have succumbed to the predatory approaches of far eastern gambling triads, it's taken the edge off the tournament. For what it counts I feel Ding has a real chance if O'Sullivan self implodes.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 16, 2008

It's a real shame Burnett appears to have succumbed to the predatory approaches of far eastern gambling consortia, it's taken the edge off the tournament for me. For what it counts I feel Ding has a real chance if O'Sullivan self implodes.

add comment | complain about this comment

Comment on this article

Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.

RATE THIS ARTICLE

Rate Breakdown

  • 5 75.00%
    3 votes
  • 4
    0 votes
  • 3
    0 votes
  • 2
    0 votes
  • 1 25.00%
    1 votes

average rating:
4.00 from 4 votes