BBC Home

Explore the BBC

New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in
Browse: Tennis

102 comments

user rating: 4 star

Murray Final Fling Proves he's Born Winner

comment on the article
Andy Murray

At the BBC Sports Personality show in 2004, a little-known 17 year old strode up to Sir Clive Woodward, introduced himself as "tennis player Andrew Murray", and listened for at least 10 minutes about how to get to the top in sport.

He was acquainted with the talent - the skinny Scot had just won the US Open junior title and a series of senior clay court events - but it was the incredible self-confidence which struck the Rugby World Cup-winning coach.

Here was a young man with an unswerving belief in his own ability, yet a willingness to learn. It's no surprise to Sir Clive that four years later Murray is a world-class talent.

Also no shock was the way Murray finished his year here at The Masters Cup in Shanghai.

Some players may have conserved energy by surrendering to defeat in their final group match, to Roger Federer, safe in the knowledge they had already qualified for the semis.

That was never an option for Andy Murray. He considers Federer the best player of all time and he wanted to beat him. End of story.

It took three hours, which was an inconvenience, but he got the win he craved. He gave everything and it drained everything, but his positive approach reaffirmed the fact that here we have a natural-born winner.

Let's face it - he could have jacked it in against Federer and still lost the semi-final.

It's been a wonderful 11-month world tour for Murray from Doha to Shanghai, with his first two Masters Series titles, a first Grand Slam final at the US Open, qualification for a first Masters Cup and a peak at number four in the world.

Read about Andy Murray's magical 2008

Most significantly, he's sufficiently scared his main rivals at the top of the game to suggest he's going to be a major force at the majors in 2009. Since July he's beaten Federer three times, Novak Djokovic twice and Rafael Nadal once.

Technically and tactically, Murray is a much better player than even six months ago.

His first serve has improved gradually throughout the year and the development of a wickedly slicing delivery, particularly to the deuce court, is now winning him plenty of cheap points.

It sets him up for a potent one-two; the slice serve out wide followed by an angle-changing backhand drive into the other corner.

It's something he's learnt from watching Federer gain so many cheap points with his serve/forehand combination.

His backhand slice has improved, now even more consistent, he's standing closer to the baseline, more aggressive with his groundstrokes, and his transition game has developed impressively.

He appears more prepared for where he needs to be at the net in relation to the approach shot and his opponent's position.

Moving into 2009, the second serve still needs more bite but it's hard to spot other areas which need glaring improvement.

He wants to get stronger physically and put on more muscle weight and a winter of strength and fitness work in the Florida heat should see to that.

Away from the tennis, it's a completely different Andy Murray we watch and admire at the end of 2008.

He waves, he smiles, he doesn't pick fights, he doesn't hide behind his cap - all this peripheral stuff has really helped smooth the ground to build his game upon.

In this column back in May I said that it was no coincidence that a bad attitude was corresponding with bad results.

The opposite now is true.

Credit must go to his team of Miles Maclagan, Andy Ireland, Matt Little and Jez Green. They were hired to create a positive team spirit as much as for their individual expertise in areas of coaching, physiotherapy and fitness.

As Sir Clive Woodward told him during that conversation in 2004, "leave no stone unturned with regard to your preparation".

Assisted by his team, Murray will go into 2009 in the best possible shape to challenge at all of the major championships and will undoubtedly start the Australian Open in January as one of the title favourites.

And the most exciting thing of all? A ten-year-plus career has only just begun.

Latest 10 comments

Read members' comments or add your own

posted Nov 27, 2008

I think he is a born hobbit.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Nov 27, 2008

hi p'delp'o
Unfair to compare Murray with nadal, as Rafa was one of those rare phenoms - a teenage GS winner. And there ain't been many of those.
Murray either made - or almost made - the top 10 as a teenager which is not at all bad.
He might even end up having more top 10 years than Rafa as the Spaniard's body may not enable him to dominate for a long time.

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by CUJMee (U6758932)

posted Nov 28, 2008

"he has not won anything of note yet. He has skill, maybe the potential, but despite his age (Nadal) he has won next to nothing"

Bizarre. He recently won two master series titles back to back. You can count the number of players in the current top twenty who have won two MS titles on the fingers of one hand and most of those are older than Murray. There's no point in expecting people to take you seriously if you write such rubbish.

If slams were really the only titles that matter, Federer, at the same age as Murray is now, would be a non-starter as far as you are concerned.

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by CUJMee (U6758932)

posted Nov 28, 2008

"In the current top ten", I meant.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 2, 2008

For all the comments on here that he doesn't compare to Federer it should be mentioned that at Murray's age Federer had not won any Slams OR Masters titles, he got his first in the Summer of 2003 when he was just shy of 22

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 6, 2008

But no one called Federar a born winner in 2003. That's the point..

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 7, 2008

Just be happy that you have a British player to talk about. He is still young, and he is very hungry for success. I am so curious to see his development over the next 3 years. I don't have the greatest of expectations for 2009, not because he can't deliver, more because he deserves to be given more time. He is definately one of the most talented tennis players out there that's for sure.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 12, 2008

Come on people, Murray hasn't had that great a year, he is 22 and went to a Grand Slam final and choked!! woooooooooooooooooooo!! Once agin in Britain, lets hype everyone up ridiculously before they do anything great.

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by CUJMee (U6758932)

posted Dec 13, 2008

Rule No 1 for moronic, football-loving WUMs:

Get your facts right.

Murray is 21.

Rule No 2: this forum is frequented by people who know their tennis, so "hasn't had that great a year" won't cut it when he has won two masters series tournaments back-to-back and risen to World No 4. Neither will "went to a Grand Slam final and choked", since anyone who follows tennis seriously knows that there's a difference between losing a match and choking.

Rule No 3: Understand the difference between "hyping up" a player "ridiculously" and getting enthusiastic about the only real slam prospect we have had in Britain for 70 years. Bear in mind that the likes of Sampras and Bjorg have been predicting that he will win a slam at some point. They have more authority in this matter than football-loving wind-up merchants.

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by Will (U10796859)

posted Dec 13, 2008

CUJMee

well said my man!

add comment | complain about this comment

Comment on this article

Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.

RATE THIS ARTICLE

Rate Breakdown

  • 5 76.00%
    19 votes
  • 4 8.00%
    2 votes
  • 3
    0 votes
  • 2
    0 votes
  • 1 16.00%
    4 votes

average rating:
4.28 from 25 votes