BBC Home

Explore the BBC

New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in

442 comments

user rating: 4 star

How refs can win our respect

Premier League Bolton Wanderers
by Mark A - BBC Sport (U5611457) 28 September 2008
comment on the article
Rob Styles

Howler and nonsense. Two words used by Bolton boss Gary Megson describing the decision by referee Rob Styles to award a penalty to Man United.

And it wouldn't take a lip reader to understand what Man City boss Mark Hughes was thinking on Sunday when Steve Bennett pointed to the spot after Wigan's Wilson Palacios went flying in the box.

Ohhhh to have been a fly on the wall in the Megson household on Saturday evening when the TV flicked over to Match of the Day to get another view of Jlloyd Samuel's perfectly timed tackle on Cristiano Ronaldo.

Alan Hansen said it was a decision worse than bad. Even Fergie was surprised, although he did add it was “payback time” and that Styles owed United “another four” penalties.

But Styles’ decision also raised the issue of accountability.

Seven years ago the boys in black (or blue, green or …) were made professional, and as well as improving consistency, a major aim was to make them more accountable.

Accountability. It’s all about accepting responsibility and blameworthiness.

But how do you achieve it in football and satisfy the millions of fans inside the stadiums or on their sofas screaming at the officials wondering why he’s just pointed to the spot?

Up until now, it seems to have involved blaming the referee, taking his whistle away and putting him on gardening leave for a few weeks.

You might remember just over a year ago Chelsea got a dodgy penalty earning a 1-1 draw with Liverpool at Anfield. Any guesses who the referee was for that game?

Yep, Mr Styles. Referees' chief Keith Hackett explained at the time he expected officials to get big decisions correct and promptly relieved Styles of his duties the following weekend. Officials had to be accountable for mistakes, he said.

Former Arsenal star and BBC Sport pundit Lee Dixon was angry about the decision which led to Bolton losing 2-0 to Man United and said on Saturday’s Score he couldn’t see how this act of demoting would improve officials’ conduct.

He also had a view on how to achieve accountability.

“I want the referees to have to come out after every game to give an interview – not a grilling – but an interview and an insight in to what he was thinking when he gave that decision.”

It was an opinion that also got support in the Match of the Day studios on Saturday night.

Alan Shearer said: “(Styles) politely declined the offer to come out and explain the decision after the game.

"I think if he had come out, held his hands up and said ‘Ive made a mistake there’, I think people would respect and understand that - but they don’t come out and say that.”

So would a referee popping out after a match explaining his decisions be enough to satisfy you?

Maybe we should all just shut up, show a bit of respect and let them get on with the job. Give us your thoughts.

Latest 10 comments

Read members' comments or add your own

posted Oct 4, 2008

I think a challenge system is a lousy idea because it would be open to abuse. They don't have it in rugby as far as I know and so i don't know why it would need to be introduced into football, at least not straight away. We've just been discussing whether video evidence would slow the game down and no sooner have we done that than people come up with a way of slowing it down even more. One step at a time.

As a first step, just introduce video evidence for IMPORTANT decisions the officials aren't sure about, not ones the coaches disagree with! Various refinements can come later.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Oct 4, 2008

As for soccer reflecting the way society is going, if it does, there's no hope for it. Before long, players will be stabbing each other on the pitch.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Oct 5, 2008

eternalballwatcher, that's why you'd place a challenge at cost to s substitution. Abuse of the system will lose you subs and that's huge in today's game.

Also you could add a review and if teams are found to be abusing it then you can dock them challenges in subsequent games, fine them, dock them up to three points etc.

I would give it a one minute time limit so that too much time isn't wasted.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Oct 5, 2008

Why can't substitutions happen over the halfway line supervised by the 4th official whilst the game continues?

Substitutions were originally brought in to stop the unfair disadvantage when a team loses a player to injury.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Oct 9, 2008

Everybody is lying to themselve if they think they can do a better job than the current refs we have. The time has come to use technology....NOW. I dont'care how it is implemented, I don't care if it slows it down.....it's time....get the video evidence during and after the game for retrospective fines, get the goal line technology , get two refs on the field and let's end this farce. I am sick of hearing Fergie , Wenger , Benitez , and the rest spew thei crap like they are superior beings and could do a better job. Why don;t they blame their players for once about the diving ,the insults, and the cowardly behaviour!!!!It is ridiculous SIR ALex!!!!!!!!!!!The times he has sworn at a ref and bullied hime...what is regal about that !!?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Oct 21, 2008

All referees will make poor decisions its a fact of life but what is becoming worrying is the perceived bias of officials towards the top clubs with Man Utd being the prime example of favourable treatment as already this season two decisions have been instrumental in Man Utd victorys and as a Sunderland supporter ive watched two free kicks for and against us result in goals one given one disallowed (Villa & Fulham )where so called offences in the wall have decided the result of the game . Sooner or later technology must come into the game to stop these blatant mistakes carrying on

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Oct 21, 2008

Apologies from referrees will not help. There is no way to rectify a mistake once made. That said, video replay technology might be of service, although there must necessarily be some stoppage of play. Irksome, I know. A right to challenge a poor decision by means of video review seems reasonable to me. The 4th official could be given the task of monitoring the telecast and recalling the video. Decisions could be taken together by the match referree and his assistants. It could be done, but the "flow of play" would be compromised. It's value check time. How much do we really want to get it right?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Oct 24, 2008

Refs can win our respect
By being absolutely perfect.
I would make the world's most perfect ref,
If I wasn't lame, blind and deaf.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Oct 24, 2008

Like Rob Styles
(Sorry I couldn't find a rhyme)

add comment | complain about this comment

Comment on this article

Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.

RATE THIS ARTICLE

Rate Breakdown

  • 5 67.27%
    37 votes
  • 4 9.09%
    5 votes
  • 3 3.64%
    2 votes
  • 2 3.64%
    2 votes
  • 1 16.36%
    9 votes

average rating:
4.07 from 55 votes