MAN CITY AND OTHER MANAGERSby 1BLUECITY (U8743415) 05 September 2008
First may I apologise for leaving some clubs out ( couldn't fit them all in ) Latest 10 commentsRead members' comments or add your own
comment by
bburnrover (U1779342) posted Sep 5, 2008 If City fans think like that they are up their own backsides.The situations at Necastle and West Ham are identical and any self respecting employee would have left under those horrific circumstances.
comment by
yorkrover (U12345203) posted Sep 5, 2008 It's a good question. KK did say that he would not be able to get NUFC into the top four. He didn't seem to be under any illusion as to their place in the league. Ashley, on the other hand, must suffer from delusions of grandeur.
comment by
YorkshireTic (U7695675) posted Sep 5, 2008 THERE'S ALWAYS A POINT IN CARRYING ON. People are jumping the gun with City. Money can give you an advantage but it can't guarantee success.
comment by
nue456 (U2966425) posted Sep 5, 2008 Future?
comment by
Amnesiacs Anonymous (U6690254) posted Sep 5, 2008 "Simple question.....Now that Man City have eclipsed all clubs wealth by a country mile,do you think that kevin Keegan and Alan Curbishley considered the immediate future for their club and came to the conclusion, "whats the point of carrying on"
comment by
The Media loathes the Rovers (U4678936) posted Sep 5, 2008 No matter how rich they are, they can only field 11 payers.
comment by
tomlyonlatics (U7136860) posted Sep 5, 2008 It won't be a problem really because Chelsea's full of superstars too and we should've had a point a couple of weeks ago as everyone knows.
comment by
Sahun78 (U12674386) posted Sep 5, 2008 just abit of bling somthing to get the consortium known so they can show up at matches when making deals like ive said before couple of years ago it would have been an NFL or an NBA team at the moment the premiership is the place to be sign of our leagues success but even chelsea are slowing down they had aload of intial spending to get themselves into the top four game now there spending is targeted and the squad is been slimmed down as the players bought in the intial rush are let go man city will do the same but they have to complete with the kudos of old trafford in the same place.
comment by
mailhatesmyteam (U13077439) posted Sep 5, 2008 Knowing City's luck someone will invent something which means we don't need oil any more.
comment by
barndoorbarlow (U12605680) posted Sep 6, 2008 When Sir Bobby was at Ipswich he didn't give up because Liverpool were top,Notts forest had a million pound player and united had Moses on their side.No, but he still won the league.We have the Bruce, Chelsea are top and we need God on our side!Seriously though Man city can only buy twenty odd great players and they still need to play like a team-I saw a potential wish list in the paper the other day and wondered who would win the ball for them?You need ball winners even if they are not flashy players. Comment on this article
Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.
|