Saints fined after salary cap breachSuper League by Paul Fletcher (U1816326) 22 August 2008 St Helens have been fined £8,456 after being found guilty of a minor salary cap breach during the 2007 season. Latest 10 commentsRead members' comments or add your own
comment by
trentthepie (U9017409) posted Aug 23, 2008 Saints breach was obiviously a small one but it is the 4th time so this needs taking into account as well. Maybe the fine could have been doubled?
comment by
stumbleupwards (U11229963) posted Aug 23, 2008 I think the comparsion to breaking the speedlimit is an intersting one, this offence is clearly the equivant of being a couple of mph over the limit which, on its own, deserves a minimal punishment. however this is the 4th time this as happened in a short time so i would accept ifi t were me 'driving' that pnishment would be increased. i am not saying saints need huuge points deduction but i do think super league need to take slighly more action.
comment by
JB1973 (U9701706) posted Aug 23, 2008 As for the notion tha tthe salary cap is somehow illegal, well i am sure the clubs have lwyers farmore qualified than me or anyone on these boards to make such judgments. but my understanding was that they are not prevnting a business rom operating as they choose what they are saying is that if you want to operate wuithin this particular competition you must obey these rulkes, there is nothing to stop a club refusing to obey the cap ,and breaking away from the league,he reality however is that would obviously be suicide due to the lack of tv revenue etc.
comment by
BlakBruker (U1647588) posted Aug 23, 2008 Another armchair lawyer JB
comment by
fleainyourear (U9221062) posted Aug 23, 2008 Salary cap--its been happening,defaulters.It will continue to be used,Maybe there will continue to be defaulters.
comment by
fleainyourear (U9221062) posted Aug 23, 2008 By the way i wasnt suggesting that for minor offences that loss of home field advantage should be considered,so i hope Saints fans dont think that is a axe being ground.
comment by
JB1973 (U9701706) posted Aug 23, 2008 Im not saying I agree with it BB but if a club wants to pay a player £5,000,000 a year and decided to take the RFL court legally the rfl wouldn't have a leg to stand on, you don't need to be a lawyer to work that 1 out.
comment by
BlakBruker (U1647588) posted Aug 24, 2008 You know that for sure having watched Ironside on telly I take it?
comment by
huddersfield1895 (U6370658) posted Aug 24, 2008 all the clubs agree with the salary cap as they know it will protect the long term future of the game.
comment by
BlakBruker (U1647588) posted Aug 24, 2008 Precisely H1895, I would imagine the courts would simply say "You agreed by these rules in the first place" Sport can and will govern itself. Comment on this article
Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.
|