BBC Home

Explore the BBC

New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in

148 comments

user rating: 3 star

Why take the chance?

Premier League Arsenal
by Plymouth Gooner (U4402143) 13 August 2008
comment on the article

Most Arsenal fans believe that we are a couple of signings away from having a team that can win the title. I believe that two signings and we'd have the best squad in the country.

I'd like an experienced centre half. Somebody like Mexes or Metzelder. Not necessarily to replace Gallas or Toure but to be part of a rotation system. Senderos, Djourou and Song are good back up players but can not be relied upon in big games (such as the Liverpool games Senderos was thrown into at the end of last season). You could argue that a new signing would hamper the progress of our three youngsters and that one of them could come good, or that Toure and Gallas could become a great pairing - but why take the chance?

Silvestre would be perfect! He'd be happy to be part of a rotation of CBs, he could fill in at LB as cover for Clichy and could be relied upon in the big games. Being near the end of his career it also wouldn't hamper the progress of the likes of Senderos, Djourou, Song and Nordveit.


I'd also like a partner for Fabregas. A physical player capable of doing the dirty work and allowing Fabregas to flourish. Denilson, Diaby and Ramsey are all good squad players but Denilson and Diaby have not seized the opportunities given to them. You could argue that Ramsey might become that player - but why take the chance?

We have lots of youngsters and no doubt some of them will come good. It could be argued that signing experienced players would hamper their progress, that there is a good chance that they will make the step up this season and win something - but why take the chance?

The money needed to sign two experienced players is nothing compared to the money we'd accumulate if we won the Premiership or the Champions League. Not just prize money, but from what it would do for the 'Arsenal brand'. Two signings would make our squad one of Wenger's best ever, Wenger might suggest that we have players who could step up, but why take the chance?

Latest 10 comments

Read members' comments or add your own

posted Aug 18, 2008

da_king91
You forgot Vela who looks very good, 20 goals plus a season striker.

I do think we could do with two more experienced players but, dont forget we still have Ros to come back who has experience hopfully he can fill place next to Fab. or even toure could maybe fill it because it looks like Wenger fancies the partnership of Gallas and djouri.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Aug 18, 2008

gooonerdan

We should have kept diarra.
------------------------------------------
Why does every one keep thinking that Wenger had a look at him and said no get rid of him? Diarra wanted to go so how could we have kept him or do you mean we sould have put Fab or Flam on the bench and started him instead?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Aug 20, 2008

why not take the chance? if you do not take chances you dont get results. If someone didnt want to take a chance with flying a plane we wouldnt be able to fly its a principle is wenger didnt take the chance with fabregas after veira he wouldnt be this great, same with ade etc

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Aug 20, 2008

Because we have spent 4 years taking the chance on players, most of whom haven't taken their chance!

Why stick to players who might do a job when you could make a couple of singings who you know can do the job?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Aug 20, 2008

i like the way our squad is meant to be weaker than last year

nasri is hlebs replacement, and look, he was the best player against brom and scored. something hleb hardly did. so weaker or improved?

as for flamini, he had one good season and wanted wages to match cesc, i mean how insulting to cesc would that have been! also we havent seen who could partner cesc, diaby, denilson and ramsey could all come of good.

silvestre might be good cover aswell, but he aint half the player he was. i think alonso would give us the final piece in our midfield. and maybe silvestre might be good cover.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Aug 20, 2008

I agree i think We are two players away from a title winning Side.

personally I would sign:

Christian Zapata: Tall, Strong, Quick and can play anywhere along the back four.

Xavi Alonso: Technically excellent and a better defender than Fabregas, he was instrumental in Liverpools Champions league Success & Benitez has been quoted saying he is willing to sell.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Aug 20, 2008

The problem is Arsenal rely heavily on the brilliance of wenger to keep up with Man utd and Chelsea. His system of play is like no other, and with a squad of overall less talented players than the top 2, manages to cut teams apart with their brilliant play. Canny signings have also helped over the years. When their system breaks down there is almost never a plan B, and only ever seems to be a plan B when Adebayor is on form which didn’t happen in the latter part of last season. In my opinion Arsenal did very well last season to make the gap only 4 points.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Aug 21, 2008

The problem is Arsenal rely heavily on the brilliance of wenger to keep up with Man utd and Chelsea. His system of play is like no other, and with a squad of overall less talented players than the top 2, manages to cut teams apart with their brilliant play. Canny signings have also helped over the years. When their system breaks down there is almost never a plan B, and only ever seems to be a plan B when Adebayor is on form which didn’t happen in the latter part of last season. In my opinion Arsenal did very well last season to make the gap only 4 points.
-----------------------------------------------
I agree with alot of what you said, and even SAF said more or less the samething, but i dont think they have less telented players then the top 2 i just think they are younger and less known but not less talented.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Aug 21, 2008

In England there are only 3 other clubs that are considered of an equal stature to Arsenal and in Europe I'd say there are only another 5 - the big 2 of Spain and the big 3 in Italy.
__________


laugh

liverpool, manchester united, ac milan, juventus, inter, ajax, real madrid, barca all bigger than arsenal.


id say arsenal were on par with roma and valencia...

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Aug 21, 2008

I think we are on par with inter but bigger then roma and Valencia.

add comment | complain about this comment

Comment on this article

Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.

RATE THIS ARTICLE

Rate Breakdown

  • 5 20.00%
    1 votes
  • 4 20.00%
    1 votes
  • 3 40.00%
    2 votes
  • 2
    0 votes
  • 1 20.00%
    1 votes

average rating:
3.20 from 5 votes