Browse: Cricket Tim Ambrose...by Dion (U2980017) 08 August 2008 Look, if you want him gone fine, but dont use todays dismissal as a judgement. He got out to the best ball out of everyone, it wasn't a waft outside off stump, he had to play at it and it left him. If we're going to drop someone for playing a waft outside off stump then lets get rid of Strauss, Cook, Bell, Pietersen, Flintoff and Broad. They all got out to worse shots than Ambrose, he may have failed with the bat today, but going on current form that delivery would have gotten 7-8 of our players out. Latest 10 commentsRead members' comments or add your own
comment by
'Arrys White & Blue Army (U6146909)
comment by
Real_Estate(I am who I am) (U9328809) posted Aug 10, 2008 ....."a half or third chance...." said Peter Moores referring to Ambrose's attempt to catch Amla down the leg side on Friday.........
comment by
saltyjim (U2949240) posted Aug 10, 2008 Ambrose suffers from the perception, right or wrong, that he is in the team because of his connection with Moores. Consequently, like Geraint Jones before him, there is the feeling he didn't quite earn his place.
comment by
ulsterman (U3192992) posted Aug 10, 2008 I think Tim Ambrose should have been gone for this test with a view to setting in a new keeper for the tour to India. Prior or Foster would be best.Chris Read is has had his chances, although he probably is the best gloveman,his batting lets him down and a solid batsman is what england need at the minute.
comment by
oswyntail (U5375033) posted Aug 10, 2008 Wicketkeepers should be selected as keepers alone, not as auxiliary batsmen. The balance of the side is 6/4 or 5/5, plus WK. Get the best keeper, and work on his batting if necessary. A batsman only gets dropped for one reason, likewise a bowler. I haven't watched all the keeping candidates (unlike, obviously, everyone else on this board)but I believe taking on Prior or Mustard for their batting is not right.If the specialist skills of WK are not really that important, why not go for straight batter?
comment by
galactictitchimus (U12768830) posted Aug 10, 2008 Right, drop ambrose, train cook up as a full time keeper, because the part time keepign eh did was bloody amazing. Then make cook a no.3 batsmen strauss and bell openeing. that will solve the wicket keeper problem and the opening pair being too similar. then bring simon jones back into the team
comment by
bevinboy101 (U12956708)
comment by
lordnozom (U1699357) posted Aug 10, 2008 "his batting lets him down and a solid batsman is what england need at the minute. "
comment by
UndisputedChampion (U12725116)
comment by
englads2fan (U7038664) posted Aug 10, 2008 Tim Ambrose would be struggling in his county side, never mind the England side. He is not fit to clean Chris Reeds boots. Mr Moores who has no England/International experience, appears to be completely ignoring form/performance, only picks his favourite yes men, England deserve & should get better. Comment on this article
Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.
|