posted Jul 21, 2008

id take tommy lovenkrands back to st johnstone lol

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 21, 2008

I would take lovenkrands back in a second it what give us pace on the left and right or up front

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 22, 2008

If the pre-requisite for an effective left sided midfield player is a bit of pace then I think we should consider signing Dwain Chambers.
He is faster than Lovenkrands and likely to be just as productive over 90 mins.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 22, 2008

Too late, Rangers signed Kenny.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 22, 2008

nwecalumisthebestger

Glory hunter? I've been a season ticket holder for 10 years. Im not exactly whinging. Im jus saying what most Gers fans are thinking. The performance against Schalke was awful. And the 4-5-1 formation jus doesn't do justice when it needs to. We can't keep playing for draws and watch boring football. Gers fans want to see attackin football. Not 11 men behind the ball. And 2 subs in a pre season? Whats that all about. So much for Walter's previous comment "Everyone will get loads of game time." Hmm........

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 22, 2008

i think lovenkrangs wouldbe a decent signing because it would mabye stop walter from playing adam on the left wealso need a creative midfielder

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 22, 2008

id luv 2 c pistol pete back at ibrox, caldwell and mcmanus could not cope with the pase of lovenkrans, beasley and novo all lining up together. rangers still need a quality midfielder tho. davies fits he bill! so gers should do wateva it takes to get thm bth

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 22, 2008

I agree way aw of them espeacily the comment from g28-anderson, it's a cracker..
i think personaly that we should have thought about all this before we went and bought all the strikers.. a mean like we have more stikers than we can shake a stick at... looking at it now, if lovenkrands said that he wanted to come back earlier, we could have sealed the deal way davis then bought lovenkrands then lafferty, instead of buying miller.........

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 23, 2008

Lovenkrands has pace but is much more effective through the centre. Either way we have Beasley for the left and about 20 strikers through the centre so I don't understand why Lovenkrands is so important.Although Broadfoot did the best he could, surely a solid right back is a much bigger priority?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 23, 2008

i agree the 5-4-1 formation isnt working.lovenkrands would be a good boost for midfield,and im glad they have tried to improve the strike force.wee needa dump the dead wood like cousin to free up sum money!!

add comment | complain about this comment