BBC Home

Explore the BBC

545 comments

user rating: 4 star

Let Chambers Run

Olympics
by the_puzzle (U8916003) 09 July 2008
comment on the article

Dwain Chambers should be allowed to compete in the forthcoming Beijing Olympics. What is certain, other than Chambersí self-confessed use of performance enhancing substances, is the frankly farcical treatment he has suffered at the hands of those governing British athletics.

Chambers has admitted his misdemeanours, served his penance, won silver in the 60m at the World Indoor Championships and looks certain to record the necessary qualifying time at the upcoming Olympic trials. A spent ban should mean past transgressions have no bearing on future endeavours and Chambers has done everything asked of him, thus far, as a now clean athlete.

This is not simply about Britainís medal-winning prospects; UK Athletics cannot sideline a sprinter, allow him return to competition, allow him to re-establish himself as the nationís leading light in his discipline and allow him to represent his country at world level, only for the British Olympic Association to continue to enforce a lifetime ban on his Olympic participation. Chambers would argue that he is being punished for the same crime twice, (and is set to do so in court), but he is wrong. This is not merely punishment, this is torture.

One absolutely cannot condone drugs in sport; that is not up for debate. There must, however, be uniformity in punishment. The governing bodies of British athletics have actually done this to themselves. I would have no objection should both UKA and the BOA enforce lifetime bans for those found guilty of abusing performance enhancing drugs, but they cannot continue to visit the same colossal injustice on athletes in the future as they have done Mr. Chambers.

Furthermore, there must be a degree of international uniformity with regard to punishments. Justin Gatlin Iím sure feels aggrieved that his initial 4-year ban is double that imposed on Chambers by UKA. While they have undoubtedly visited the punishment on themselves, such lack of consistency is not just. A blanket lifetime ban for drugs offenders on a global scale simply disgraces the individual, rather than allowing the individual to muddy the name of athletics in the courtroom and the press, through wrangling over an unclear and inconsistent approach to what should be the simplest of punishments to administer.

The bottom line is that Chambers, and all other athletes in the same position, should be allowed to compete at the Olympics until both UKA and the BOA have addressed their stance accordingly.

Latest 10 comments

Read members' comments or add your own
comment by Gary (U12693287)

posted Jul 18, 2008

Let me put it in simpe speak in crayon if it helps. Because-there-is-no-law-by-the-FA-that-says-he-cant.

With-chambers-there-is......got it, its been in the news a bit, you might have seen it.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 18, 2008

Dwaine - go to UAE, come back and compete in this or the next Olympics, and laugh in Steve Crams face while doing so.

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by Gary (U12693287)

posted Jul 18, 2008

how pathetic, even stepped on a track mate?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 18, 2008

Has somebody taken my message off for speaking sense?

Great democracy?

As I said our greats including Steve Cram know what it's like to put the work in in order to achieve success without resorting to cheating.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 18, 2008

Geordiedevil, In the real world of written English, one simply can't start a sentence with the word, 'because.'Perhaps I am not aware of your 'crayon speak' rules.
Got it... it's been in the textbooks for years, old boy.

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by Gary (U12693287)

posted Jul 18, 2008

Perryashburtongroves. Well done Mr Teacher. Still does not alter the fact that the cheat is gone. Thats the real victory here

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 18, 2008

Thank god the correct result was reached, he deserves everything he gets, cheat!!!!

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 19, 2008

Geordiedevil, you also need a full-stop at the end of your last post.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 19, 2008

If Chambers wants to continue as a sprinter, there is no rule stopping him from doing so and good luck to him making a living. The rules are very clear about proven drug cheats never representing GB at the Olympics, so he may continue in other competitions, and nothing but his own pride can stand in his way.

If the GB team doesn't have a runner in the final, then we don't deserve to.

I'm proud that we have this stance and I think it sets an example to other countries, as in many other aspects of our sporting pursuits. Britain's honest, consistent, sportsmanship is a credit to the nation.

add comment | complain about this comment

Comment on this article

Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.

RATE THIS ARTICLE

Rate Breakdown

  • 5 63.83%
    30 votes
  • 4 2.13%
    1 votes
  • 3
    0 votes
  • 2
    0 votes
  • 1 34.04%
    16 votes

average rating:
3.62 from 47 votes