BBC Home

Explore the BBC

New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in

50 comments

user rating: 2 star

Macgill Retires

International Tests Australia
by englandmad666 (U6926799) 01 June 2008
comment on the article

Hello all, Stuart Macgill today has announced his retirement from international cricket after the 2nd test v the west indies finishes in antiuga.

Macgill spent most of his years playing understoody to warne, but dont let that reflect on his bowling it would be argued barring Sir lanka he could have walked into any other national team as first choice spinner.

His strike rate was second to none, and his best times in a australian jersey where when warne was serving his suspension. However they did work well as unit also and many argued that Macgill should have kept his place when warne returned.

But Warne took back his place and rised to become the leading wicket taker until he was dethroned by Murali.

Needless to say now both him and warne have retired the australians will have a big hole in there spin bowling department. Unless clarke continues the way he does!

Anyway Stuart Macgill is a great spinner and his career will probably be remembered as the unluckiest man in world cricket in living in the shadow of the Great Shane warne.

What do you think of Macgills career as a spinner?

Comments please

Latest 10 comments

Read members' comments or add your own

posted Jun 2, 2008

On his day MacGill was an excellent leg spinner. Clearly he's now past his best and clearly the Aussies have one eye on the Ashes and MacGill knows as much the Aussie Cricket Board that the time is right to let someone hungrier and fitter to take his place and get some useful experience. Warne coming back would be a ridiculous decision and i'm sure he wouldn't be picked, as, unlike England, they are looking to the future.
Beau Casson has a lot to live up to but looks to have all the attributes to give England a going over. He's another leg spinner (why haven't England got one yet?) and unlike MacGill, Casson can bat a bit, and after 40 first class matches has a useful average of 25.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jun 2, 2008

<< His record is better than it looks because he's bowled about 75% in tests where the wickets are big turners (SGE etc.)

>> Ok i suppose you could argue that. But lets consider this. Why has:-

Anil Kumble got a bowling average of 29
Danish Kaneria got a bowling average of 34
Mushtaq Ahmed got a bowling average of 33
Harbhajan Singh got a bowling average of 31

These guys all frequently bowl on tracks suited to spin bowling. Yet their average is not as good as that of Stuart Macgill.

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by U12132243

posted Jun 2, 2008

No they don't always play on spinning tracks.

What about in away test matches ?

MacGill is a very good bowler don't get me wrong but when someone says he would of been the third greatest spinner of all time, it's just rubbish I'm afraid.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jun 2, 2008

casson or cullen will be considered, cullens been their 3rd choice for 2 years now right up until this series so it's likely they'll give him a chance at some point, but it'll be interesting to see how they perform. Conveniently, symonds and clarke are both good spin bowlers, clarke i rate higher than panesar, so Australia are unlikely to suffer too much

England have 2 leg-spinners, Munday at Somerset and Rashid at Yorkshire, who in about 3 or 4 years will both be of near-international quality, but they have to be given time to develop.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jun 2, 2008

I didnt say "always" i said "frequently".

And there were times in which Macgill bowled on pitches that were not conducive to spin bowling - especially in the year when Warne was banned - yet he still took 53 wickets in 11 test matches in that year.



add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jun 2, 2008

How refreshing to see a sportsman retiring now he feels he cannot contribute to the team. Please please please read and learn Frank Lampard.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jun 2, 2008

Macgilla...keep smiling mate..another junction another train..thanks for being there when the Oz desperately needed a spinster. ok

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jun 3, 2008

Guys, remember what made Warnie different was his incredible control, particularly for a leggie. Now having watched him wield his skills for the last decade plus & set the standard for leg-spinners we tend to forget that traditionally leg-spinners have always been expensive. Macgill during his career is nearer to his earlier practitioners in terms control. In his own words he always tried to have 5 good balls in an over (IE he expected at least one rubbish ball an over!) One reason hes quitting now is that he's got the proportion reversed. Don't let the pastich of recent memories of bad bowling over-ride the general standard that he exhibited throughout a long and successful career at both first-class & international level. Tangles

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jun 4, 2008

"Guys, remember what made Warnie different was his incredible control, particularly for a leggie"

ok True.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jun 5, 2008

Full credit to McGill, I always prefered watching him to watching Warnie - maybe thats cos I'm english and anyone was better for us than Warne - but McGill must be missed and remembered as crickets greatest ever understudy.

add comment | complain about this comment

Comment on this article


RATE THIS ARTICLE

Rate Breakdown

  • 5
    0 votes
  • 4 25.00%
    1 votes
  • 3
    0 votes
  • 2 25.00%
    1 votes
  • 1 50.00%
    2 votes

average rating:
2.00 from 4 votes