BBC Home

Explore the BBC

New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in
Browse: Golf The Open

28 comments

user rating: 3 star

Iain Carter Column

comment on the article
R&A boss Peter Dawson

Golf is a game where nothing happens very quickly. On the course and in the offices of the administrators things tend to be done in a measured and considered way.

So even when drug testing has been introduced into the professional game the Royal and Ancient has decided not to employ testers at this year's Open at Royal Birkdale.

The PGA Tour in America and the European Tour will introduce their drug programmes at the beginning of July, but despite playing a leading role in encouraging this move the R&A feels it is too soon to be testing for drugs at the Open.

Is this a cop out? Are they ducking the issue? These are legitimate questions and chief executive Peter Dawson (pictured) admitted it is a “slightly unsatisfactory” scenario.

The argument against following the initiative that will be in place on the two biggest tours is that Open competitors from the other tours around the world will be at a disadvantage.

Those players will not have been receiving the advice that is currently being handed out to PGA and European Tour members to ensure they don’t fall foul of the new regime.

“We thought it more prudent to set up our drug testing programme at the Open next year,” Dawson said. “By then it will just be a routine part of the 52-week-a-year job that is anti-doping.”

So it is the measured approach rather than to go for the headline-grabbing glory of being the first major to employ drug testing.

And it is clear the R&A will be following a similar path as it sets about dealing with the biggest evil in the game at the moment, slow play.

But it is clear that, like the rest of us, the St Andrews-based governing body has had enough.

The five-hour ten-minute final round from the last pair at the Masters has prompted the R&A to put the subject of slow play on the agenda when all of golf’s big wigs gather for a pow-wow in Florida next month.

“Some of the times taken at recent high-profile events have, frankly, been unacceptable. It does filter down through the game to grass roots and it has an effect on participation.

“We have put it on the agenda and very much hope that other golfing organisations share our concern and will be willing to join with us in trying to come up with some initiatives to improve the situation,” Dawson said.

“No one wants to see two-ball golf taking more than five hours as it has done recently. It shouldn’t take more than four hours and it deserves our attention.”

So the first steps will be taken next month. It will take time because the authorities have to set about creating a cultural shift within the game.

Players are being brought up to take their time, to have elaborate pre-shot routines and to not hit the ball until they are ready.

But golf is grinding to a halt. It makes for dismal viewing and takes up too much of our time when we go to play.

It is a huge issue that the authorities have to get right. Let’s hope they don’t take too long about it.

Finally, I was fortunate enough to play Birkdale this week and despite alterations to 16 of its holes in preparation for the Open it remains a majestic test and probably the finest course in England.

The new undulating 17th green will attract criticism. It is out of character with the rest of the course and will require careful management in Championship week to ensure pin positions remain fair.

The rest of the changes are excellent. There is a net increase of six bunkers and, at 7,173 yards, it will play 155 yards longer than it did when the Open was last held there in 1998.

Avoiding strategically-placed bunkers from the tees will be of paramount importance and expect Tiger Woods to follow a similar policy to the one he employed at Hoylake where his driver stayed out of action.

In the 2008 major season this is the one to look forward to. The Masters was too slow and lacked its usual magic. The US Open is following a West Coast time schedule and rounds won’t finish until 0300 British time.

But Birkdale looks set to prove a thrilling venue. The Open promises to be the jewel in the major crown this year.

Latest 10 comments

Read members' comments or add your own

posted Apr 30, 2008

Chuffed,
I KNOW slow play is chronic, it's just that at whatever level (from Faldo and Beck and Langer of the past, Ben Crane, Stuart Appleby, Harrington, Estes of the PGA Tour for instance, Ken Brown of the BBC), we know who the culprits are and can do something about it if we have the will. As suggested above, if other courses followed the Sherrill Park ranger policy slow play at club level would vanish in a hurry.

If the Euro and PGA Tour adopted the LPGA policy of stroke penalties the same would happen on the pro tours.

But pharmaceutical aids are rife in every sport. Who'd've thunk Andy Pettitte would need hgh, or Special K a steroid? I guarantee you there are illegal drugs on the PGA Tour, even if not at your club.

Is Tiger using anything illegal to assist his healing process? Maybe, maybe not, but I guarantee other golfers indulge.

Personally, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that the recent explosion in the number of medical exemptions on Tour is not because players are foregoing hgh and steroids to accelerate the healing process as "Testing" looms.

Gary Player blows a lot of hot air, but don't discount his drug assertions.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Apr 30, 2008

slow play for professionals is a completely diferent matter than in the case of club golfers.

With club golfers it is a matter of etiquette, good manners and common sense. We(hopefully) all learn about etiquette when we are learning to play but many people just can't be bothered to put it into practice. Shouting fore, letting people through, getting ready to play and putting your bag or trolley near the next tee are all basic points but are often ignored. There are no hard and fast rules about the types of golfer who cause hold-ups. Single figure players may take fewer shots but alot of them spend ages looking at the line of putts and even pacing out distances on pitch shots. Then you get the high handicappers who spray balls everywhere and spend up to 5 minutes searching before waving you through and don't even think of playing a provisional.Then again, we all know the group of tortoises who hit balls to four different places and then all walk slowly from one to the next. What about the arrogant long hitters who can't wait to hit their shots when you are barely out of range?

With a little give and take and forethought we can all get round in between 3 and 4 hours and usually do. I do not know why anybody has the right to expect to play exactly at the pace they require. Given that golf is a social game and that we all play to different standards we have to relax and appreciate that everyone has the right to take the right amount of time on their shots; a scratch player does not have a god-given right to take twice as long over a shot than a 28 handicapper. In fact, you could argue that the high handicapper needs more time and yet I have played with low handicappers who reserve the right to take minutes over a putt and yet huff and puff if their 28 handicap partner goes into the trees a few times. What we should all be doing is helping our partners to help the game flow and not hassling people
if they are playing badly. I am a 15 handicap and from my perspective I can see that the problems are often caused by clashes between low and high handicappers, because the good players get frustrated by having to wait when they are ready to play. I would say "tough luck" and suggest the good players look at themselves and see what they can do to help the poor players; hitting the ball up their backsides and having a go at them is bad manners and doesn't work. I have played with scratch players who couldn't do enough to help with tips and encouragement and ones who could barely give you the time of day; I have played with 28 and non-handicappers who have made a real effort to do things right and have been knowledgeable about the rules and ones who thought they were on the football terraces. My point is that etiquette is neither the preserve of the good, nor of the not so good, golfer, so let's all work together to root out poor behaviour. The slowest round I have played this year is 4hours 20, behind a group who were all low single figures; they were often more than a hole behind the group in front and didn't wave us through. They would be taking probably 30 shots less than some of the higher handicappers and therefore have the ability to go round in an hour less, so why do they take longer? If you accept that each player has the same time to take a shot as any other player then you have to accept that a player taking more shots is going to take longer than a player taking fewer shots.

The pros are playing for money and I think they should be entitled to take the time they need; it is their living. It is all very well certain players saying others are slow but I bet they would all be up in arms if they were timed-out on the last putt to win a tournament and were docked a stroke. Some players like playing quickly and others don't; why should a fast player have the right to upset the rhythm of a slower player by forcing him to rush? A fast player can play his shot quickly if he wants; when it is his turn! If it is the other player's turn , why shouldn't the faster player wait?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Apr 30, 2008

on slow play - judging it in competition is so subjective, slow rounds in the masters are no doubt caused by the slickness of the greens and a few referee rulings on where balls moved on the greens, where drops should be taken etc can add up.

Why not simply have a players ballot every season where a sceret vote is taken of tour pros on each tour to name the slowest players. The six nominated worst offenders are then named and they are fined. Repeat offenders should see the fine increasing for every year they are nominated until a three strikes and you lose playing priviledges is enforced. In this case instead of banning them you could simply make them have to qualify for the tour via school.

It is self policing, vendettas etc should not come into it if we believe that golfers are as pure about their sport as they say. It will also mean that the people who really know what is acceptable week in, week out, the pros, will be making the decision. Not a referee making a subjective call based on a stop watch.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Apr 30, 2008

Richard Bland was fined more for slow play than drunk drivers and criminals.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Apr 30, 2008

Which drugs would help at golf exactly?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Apr 30, 2008

who knew Chelsea Lpool tie would have 6 times as many goals as the far more fancied ManU Barca tie

add comment | complain about this comment

posted May 2, 2008

pothered1

I believe the drug that can most help a golfer are the type that help you overcome the mental aspects of golf, such as nerves.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted May 7, 2008

Sledgmonkey,

I agree with a lot of what you are saying. I think it is up to every golfer to respect and put into practice the etiquette of the game. I think the selfish actions of a large minority are a symptom of our society at the moment - not got time for that debate.

However, I am not sure regarding your point about the slow pro. A fast player is just as put out by playing slow as a slow player is by being speeded up. However, if the golfing authorities actually did something to enforce a max time for a round then everyone would be playing at the same (average) pace. I think you would then find every golfer would adapt to that pace.

I don't think that the authorities want the agro of trying to enforce "speedy" play. They think the players might complain. An example would be the Masters - the PGA announced they would not be penalising anyone for slow play as the course was gridlocked. And how did that happen? Because they didn't enforce the rules as they are. They are as much to blame as the players.

It shouldn't be beyond the bounds of the golfing authorities to come up with a good system for enforcing a good pace in the pro game.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted May 8, 2008

every golfer regardless of ability has the right to concetrate and take their time over each shot.

Play could easily be speeded up by all players using the correct etiquette and letting groups behind through sooner.

I for one dont mind spending an extra hour on the course, it is a nice place to be after all!! and there is nothing worse than being rushed and this spoiling a good round

add comment | complain about this comment

posted May 9, 2008

How about the Pro's learn the rules of the game and the courses they are playing.

Watched Goosen and co. all standing round looking at the ball waiting for about 10 minutes on a ruling over a stance which was next to drain area last night.

I know, consult the local rules which you will have been provided with and either take the drop or play it. Idiots!

How do we manage to get round in our club/county matches without a referee!

add comment | complain about this comment

Comment on this article

Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.

RATE THIS ARTICLE

Rate Breakdown

  • 5 20.00%
    2 votes
  • 4 10.00%
    1 votes
  • 3 30.00%
    3 votes
  • 2 10.00%
    1 votes
  • 1 30.00%
    3 votes

average rating:
2.80 from 10 votes