BBC Home

Explore the BBC

New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in
Browse: Golf Masters

81 comments

user rating: 3 star

Is Monty right?

Masters
by bigmac74 (U4092430) 01 April 2008
comment on the article

I would tend to say yes. Invites should be handed out on sporting ability and not commercial interests. Neither Monty or I are saying that he should have been invited, but more the fact they chose players based on TV rights.

I would suggest that the players currently playing well and most consistently should be invited. In other words, the highest player, not already qualified, in the Asian, Euro and US money list at end March.

What do you think?

Latest 10 comments

Read members' comments or add your own

posted Apr 4, 2008

Monty has some cheek complaining about Asian TVs influence in golf, he’s played in countless unimportant Asia events just to cash in on his ‘image rights’. If he had spent his time playing high ranking events minus the jetlag; who knows he might have qualified outright

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Apr 4, 2008

Monty is pants anyways.....not in the top 50 players in the world by any stretch of the imagination

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Apr 4, 2008

at least they could let him play on the par 3 course, at least he'll reach those greens in regulation.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Apr 4, 2008

That old saying comes to mind..."Old golfers never die, they only lose their B*^^@"....I am not a keeper of stats...and correct me if I am wrong...but I seem to recall that in recent times when Monty and Jeev Singh have played in the same tournament, the Indian seems to have come out the better at the end of day 4. Even otherwise, in recent times Jeev Singh has 2 runner up places to show for his efforts. How many does Monty have?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Apr 5, 2008

Monty's barking mad - he's whining about "commercial interests"!!! How on earth does he think that golfers earn the millions and millions of dollars/euros/pounds that they do?? It's from the commercial interests that they generate. I know, let's not have any TV rights to sport and see how much of a living he scapes. Monty has always moaned and frankly, whilst I wouldn't mind his money, it's just the fact that he can't cut it any more - happens to us all - eventually

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Apr 5, 2008

Monty and many others are wrong. Invites are about making money, making people want to watch and increasing the popularity of the sport. The more people watch, the more will play and the longer our sport will continue. Lets remember, people like jeev milka have won tournaments as big as Monty (Volvo Masters) so why shouldn't they have an invited?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Apr 6, 2008

Compare Davis Love and Monty, Love as been injured but accepted he had to win this week to qualify for the masters and he has won a major

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Apr 7, 2008

Yep, sour grapes, c'mon Monty, let the golf do the talking!

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Apr 7, 2008

Monty should check his own behaviour before having a go at others. He refused to pull out of the Open when he was injured, and as a result other people were denied a place. It did him no good though and he missed the cut... serves him right.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Apr 8, 2008

Monty should not whimper. It is indeed not nice to be overhauled by players even lower in the ranking, but in 17 years twice the shlemil, what's the problem? Perhaps next year, and as a winner (who knows?!) you will be invited for the rest of your career, perhaps even as one of the honorary starters smiley. Together with Ollie and Langer, perhaps?

add comment | complain about this comment

Comment on this article


RATE THIS ARTICLE

Rate Breakdown

  • 5 25.00%
    2 votes
  • 4 12.50%
    1 votes
  • 3 12.50%
    1 votes
  • 2 12.50%
    1 votes
  • 1 37.50%
    3 votes

average rating:
2.75 from 8 votes