BBC Home

Explore the BBC

New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in
Browse: Rowing

48 comments

user rating: 4 star

Why I love the Boat Race

comment on the article
Great Britain star Andy Hodge won with Oxford in 2005

Can we get the jokes out of the way early this year? Yes, it's the same teams again competing in the 154th Boat Race on Saturday. No, Sunderland Poly won't be putting in a late entry.

No, the race will be decided on who crosses the finish line in Mortlake first not on which crew has the most syllables in their surnames or whose father owns how much of the Home Counties.

Sir Steve Redgrave once compared the Boat Race and the Olympics to go-karting and Formula One
As a fan of the annual match between Oxford and Cambridge for the last 30 years, I've heard most of them. There is always an underlying message and sometimes it's pretty vehement: many believe the Boat Race is an example of elitism that has no place in the modern sporting calendar. The first point is debatable but, to me, the second is nonsense.

Yes, the event is closed to all but the country's two oldest universities. Yes, it is dominated by those who learned to row at fee-paying schools and foreigners who have paid for their education. But that does not mean that there is no place for anyone good enough to make the crews and able enough to find a place at one of the institutions.

Andy Hodge and Peter Reed – currently considered Great Britain's best oarsmen having won gold at the 2005 and '06 World Championships – both spent time at Oxford as postgraduates having attended state schools and learned to row at other universities.

Whereas American universities offer hundreds of sporting scholarships each year, Oxford and Cambridge have an agreement not to. In fact, being a rower can actually harm your chances of getting a university place as Mike Wherley – who has won three World Championship golds with the USA and appeared at two Olympic Games – found out when he was turned down by Cambridge. Thankfully for him, he found a place at Oxford instead.

Arguably there are other British academic institutions who could compete with the big two in a good year
Is the Boat Race an anachronism? Sir Steve Redgrave once compared the Boat Race and the Olympics to go-karting and Formula One, although he later insisted that he just wanted to highlight the differences rather than to claim that one is of higher quality to the other. The race comes earlier in the season, the race is three times longer than the standard international event, it is a match race rather than six-abreast and takes place on a winding tidal course rather than a still-water lake.

All that makes it very difficult to compare the two. A Boat Race crew in a strong year (usually the one after the Olympics), training for an international season would probably figure among the top five crews in the world. Arguably there are other British academic institutions – certainly Oxford Brookes, University of London, Imperial College and Durham – who could compete with the big two in a good year. They get their chance during the regatta season, although the Oxbridge focus on this race means they generally aren't at their best by the time the summer comes around.

Three arguments come out in response to the annual jokes.

In this event there is no league season, no play-offs, no heats and no second place
One is that the Boat Race is a private match and that even if seven million people weren't watching on TV and 250,000 more didn't line the banks to watch each year, it would still go ahead. It may do but it would have to do without the sponsorship that provides full-time coaching, support and equipment.

Another is that the seven million figure proves how much interest there still is in this unique occasion. It may not be the same audience that watches the Premier League but the figure remains high despite the change in broadcaster from the BBC to ITV three years ago and the increasing dominance of football on the sporting agenda.

For me, though, it is simple. Eighteen people who you would not recognise if they bumped into you on the street (unless they were together) get to take part in an event where there is no league season, no play-offs, no heats and no second place, in front of a crowd three times that of a packed Wembley Stadium. Sometimes the Boat Race is a procession towards the end but always there is a moment of real excitement, when one crew delivers the blow that will win them the contest.

To me, those who criticise the Boat Race can't be bothered to work out what it's all about. Explain the offside rule to me and I'll return the favour.

Meanwhile, forget the backgrounds of the competitors, forget how they come to be there or whether others should take their places. Enjoy one of the sporting highlights of the year, every year.

I'll be around to argue over this one all week, inbetween going to the media events and some of the training sessions for each crew in the run-up to the event. Whether you have never seen the Boat Race before or are an aficionado it would be good to hear from you.

More Boat Race articles by Martin Gough:
Thursday: Cambridge need stroke of inspiration
Wednesday: Coxes' test of character
December trials: Oxford’s old stager, Cambridge savour early test

In photos: Boat Race snaps on Flickr

Latest 10 comments

Read members' comments or add your own

posted Mar 29, 2008

In response to legends01:

The boat race has been around for years. (so has malaria?)

It is the British Public that is interested in and obssessed with it. (country of 60-odd million, only 7 million viewers? Hardly an obsession!)

If there wasn't tv/press coverage it woudl still go ahead. (Let's see it on PPV, then)

The idea of opening it up to other universities is ludicrous. (...or democratic?)

Durham and Newcastle have their own boat race but it gets no coverage because no one cares about it. (...or knows that it exists?)

Because the boat race is in london, because it is traditional and attracts high calibre athletes it is always extremely popular (...same for fox-hunting. Are you going to defend that as well?)

1. Many of the people in this race go on to represent their country at the olympics (...as officers!).

2. Back in 1914, half the boat were killed in the subsequent WW1 (what about the millions killed fighting a toff's war?).

3. Education system has been mucked up by the government and Oxbridge have to deal with the problems it has greated (A Government dominated by Oxbridge MP's!).

4."allowed the spread of killer bugs" - oxbridge is the foremost in the search for a cure for cancer and other diseases (Haven't prevented the spread of MRSA though have they?)

5. 60% of oxbridge students come from state school (Selective state schools don't equal real comprehenisves!)

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Mar 29, 2008

In reply to PeterPointerSmith;

Again you are turning a simple Boat Race which has gone on for over 150years into a political issue which it ISN’T! How can you be so shallow minded? The arguments that you make in the previous comment are questionable to say the least. I think you should try and overcome you obsession with class differences.

I’m Scottish. I go to Strathclyde University. I don’t have any problems with people who attend Oxbridge. I come from a state school – and not a particularly good one. Get over yourself.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Mar 29, 2008

PeterPointerSmith:

The elites who took us into the Iraq war were democratically voted for by great swathes of the general public.

The viewing figures for television are inportant. England losing to South Africa in the Rugby World Cup saw 15 million viewers. In 2002, England's 3-0 victory over Denmark in the World Cup saw 16.8 million viewers tune in. Matches involving countries will get higher figures. Lewis Hamilton's final race last season saw 11 million viewers, again another television event with a national/country interest. For the Boat Race to get 7 million people watching when no countries are involved is quite commendable.

There is already a university rowing championship. I invite you to go and support the BUSA rowing championships.

The Boat Race is one of those quaint old rather mental British traditions, something to be listed alongside morris dancing, maypole dancing and black pudding.

Now kindly stop your political jibber-jabber. I'm rather tired of hearing baout how the elite classes destroy everything. The working classes are just as capable of being dishonest, deceitful and useless.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Mar 29, 2008

In reply to PeterPointerSmith

The boat race has been around for years. (so has malaria?) - Are you seriously comparing the Oxford/Cambridge boat race to a fatal and extremely dangerous disease? You're right - the Boat Race does kill thousands each year.

It is the British Public that is interested in and obssessed with it. (country of 60-odd million, only 7 million viewers? Hardly an obsession!) - 7 million is something bad? If you made a television programme and got 7 million viewers, would you consider it a failure?

If there wasn't tv/press coverage it woudl still go ahead. (Let's see it on PPV, then) - So your point now is that popular events should be pay per view. So would this also apply to the World Cup Final - apparently a few people watch that too.

The idea of opening it up to other universities is ludicrous. (...or democratic?) - Again, how right you are, to suggest opening the Oxford/Cambridge Boat Race to other universities. Actually, in the interests of democracy, why not open the Premier League to all teams in Europe - it's only democratic, after all.

Durham and Newcastle have their own boat race but it gets no coverage because no one cares about it. (...or knows that it exists?) - And, because people know about the boat race, that makes it a bad thing how?

Because the boat race is in london, because it is traditional and attracts high calibre athletes it is always extremely popular (...same for fox-hunting. Are you going to defend that as well?) - Again, why are you comparing a race to a blood sport? Oddly enough, it is possible to watch and like a boat race without going out killing animals afterwards - a concept you appear to be struggling to grasp.

1. Many of the people in this race go on to represent their country at the olympics (...as officers!) - Have you represented your country at the Olympics at all? Didn't think so.

2. Back in 1914, half the boat were killed in the subsequent WW1 (what about the millions killed fighting a toff's war?) - And now you're trying to blame WW1 on the boat race as well? I wish I knew as much as you - I wasn't aware the race cost those millions of lives.

3. Education system has been mucked up by the government and Oxbridge have to deal with the problems it has greated (A Government dominated by Oxbridge MP's!) - A government voted in by the people. If they vote in Oxbridge MPs, is that really their fault? If they wanted a better education system and felt that it was due to these MPs that the education system was so poor, why not elect a different government?

4."allowed the spread of killer bugs" - oxbridge is the foremost in the search for a cure for cancer and other diseases (Haven't prevented the spread of MRSA though have they?) - Oh, come on! Now because Oxbridge hasn't completely prevented every disease, their boat race is a waste of time? Are you aware how ridiculous some of your points are?

5. 60% of oxbridge students come from state school (Selective state schools don't equal real comprehenisves!) - So Oxbridge shouldn't select so many people from public schools, private schools, or selective state schools? Besides, do you have any evidence at all to back up your arguments?

Basically, you don't seem to have a problem with the boat race as much as with the entire upper class. The boat race is part of our cultural heritage, and you want to get rid of it because malaria's been around for a while and we haven't cured MRSA yet? Seriously?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Mar 29, 2008

Am happily working class, never rowed in my life, never went to Oxbridge, love the boat race. Go figure!
C'mon Oxford!
headhurts

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Mar 29, 2008

in response to the "it's a toff's sport argument":

I'm state educated from the Midlands, lived in a 3 bed semi with my divorced mum, left school at 16 with CSE's......
I love the boat race. I don't care how privelaged the rowers may have been. Training til you puke in all weathers, sacrificing the good life for 6 months for 1 race is good enough for me. I've always been a football fan but lately am sick of the behaviour of a lot of the 'working class' paricipants of that sport.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Mar 29, 2008

I love the Boat Race because despite what the article writer suggests, it is fairly anachronistic.

It's not modern sport for entertainment or money purposes. It's 18 men, working damn hard in training for six months, in all weather, for one race that is finished in under 20 mins.

If our soccerball players had the dedication that these athletes have always had we'd be a lot closer to winning the World Cup.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Mar 29, 2008

As an Irish rower I would like to add that despite our many 'issues' with England over the years, we tune in and watch the boat race. Its a great event, reflects a lot of training and as far as I'm aware has included rowers from all over the world, incl Ireland methinks. The stuff that the previous commentator was spouting was pure nonsense. Sometimes I think those kind of people would prefer to live in some stalinist, grey, dull, lifeless world. I think the tradition, hard-training, hard-course and sometimes close-finishing all adds to the race. Any country worth its salt cherishes its traditions. In Ireland we embrace the arts, horse-racing, Irish language (well some of us, ar a laghad!) as well as our traditional sports gaelic football, hurling etc. Britan should be proud of theirs and not let a few idiots spoil the party. Come on Cambridge!

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by hpiper (U2183285)

posted Mar 29, 2008

I LOVE THE BOAT RACE, and have possibly missed three or four in my entire life due to work or social commitments. I admit, it does tend to get a bit boring in the middle, but the build up, the race, the helicopter shots from above and the finish all combine to make a great race.

Better luck next year, Cambridge!

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Apr 7, 2008

Just to clear something up quickly - to all those who claim that "these two crews may not be the best university crews in the country" - couldn't be more wrong. Oxford and Cambridge, at least since the 1990s, have been consistently the best university crews in the UK - the difficulty is that they don't race at the same events as other universities. To put it into context, a decent boatrace blue boat is international class, other british university (Durham, Bristol, Nottingham, Manchester, Oxford Brookes, UL, IC (now)) are a good standard but never THAT good. A common argument is that the boat race crews never race in the summer. At Henley Royal Regatta a couple of years ago, the cambridge reserve boat (with some blues) won the 2nd best 8s competition (the Ladies Plate) and Oxford pushed the soon to be world champions in a nailbiter (the Germans then went on to beat the British crew by some distance the following day)

add comment | complain about this comment

Comment on this article

Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.

RATE THIS ARTICLE

Rate Breakdown

  • 5 77.78%
    14 votes
  • 4
    0 votes
  • 3
    0 votes
  • 2
    0 votes
  • 1 22.22%
    4 votes

average rating:
4.11 from 18 votes