Devaluating the SPLScottish Premier Rangers Gretna by U11192846 08 March 2008 Anyone agree that the whole shambles of the Gretna fiasco is devaluating the credentials of the SPL? Latest 10 commentsRead members' comments or add your own
comment by
AceOfArabs (U11201577) posted Mar 11, 2008 Rangers and Celtic didnt 'buy' their promenince in the SPL as such. Yes they do now kill the competition in the league, everyone else starts the season playing for 3rd and yes, its an absolute farce of a league when only 1 team outside the OF will qualify for Europe (outside of the Scottish Cup). Of course the Old Firm have been doing their bit recently to really help the co-efficient and maybe we will soon be eligible for a couple of extra places.
comment by
AceOfArabs (U11201577) posted Mar 11, 2008 no arguements there ballbhoy. Our game is in a terrible state full stop! Yes, reducing ticket prices might bring the fans back through the gates again, but a change to the format is also required to keep things fresh and interesting and make the fans WANT to come watch the team. The price of going to watch a match is within what the average family can afford on a fortnightly basis (assuming were only discussing home games here). A few beers is not a vital part of your saturday, though i do agree a pie n bovril is a must along with a match program. so realistically (after travel etc) about £50 for an adult and 2 kids. Costs me the same to take 2 kids to the cinema after popcorn/drinks etc.....
comment by
bigbairn1876 (U5388895) posted Mar 11, 2008 I'm no fan of the Old Firm but the two scenarios are completely different. The Old Firm are football clubs. Gretna is a fotball team. Mileson bought a first team to rise through the leagues but did nothing to build a proper football club. No ground, no fans, no sustainable business plan. At best this whole farce is based on hearts ruling heads and people in the corridors of power ignoring the warning signs. At worst it has been a cynical ego trip built on false promises. Ask Gretna's creditors how much sympathy they have for the plight of the club.
comment by
perthstjohnstone (U6578952) posted Mar 11, 2008 they've lied throughout thwy're meteroric rise and now they'll have to pay the price. would be ironic if motherwell were left out of pocket from gretna not being able to pay the rent. and really funny also. they cheated just as much as gretna and got away scotfree
comment by
Diamondian1992 (U11208458) posted Mar 11, 2008 The whole situation is a complete mess. My team, Airdrieonians went bust. This was due to mismanagment but mostly due to the problems encountered by building a stadium that would comply with the then 10000 seat rule, which was later changed to 6000. Monklands council rejected around 5 site proposals before finally approving, 4 years later, the first site they applied for, by which time most of the funds from the sale of the old ground had depleted. Eventually Airdrie went bust but reformed as Airdrie United and attempted to rejoin the League. Guess who they went up against? Gretna.
comment by
Yorkshirehornet (U3348298) posted Mar 11, 2008 Thanks for the info Diamondian... I now understand a little more the bad feeling.
comment by
Diamondian1992 (U11208458) posted Mar 11, 2008 No problem Yorkshirehornet...
comment by
mactexmic (U3997095) posted Mar 13, 2008 Well maybe not!. If we want a more competitive competition we have to invest in all the other the clubs outside the old firm.
comment by
MrCynical (U2250122) posted Mar 13, 2008 When a team with few fans to begin with decides to play its 'home' games 75 miles away, it devalues the league immediately. We need to reaffirm the stadium rule - if you don't have a good enough stadium, the team that finishes second in the First Division gets promoted instead of you. No ground sharing, no pleading. Comment on this article
Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.
|