Would Amauri be a good signing for Chelsea?Palermo by Saj C - BBC Sport (U1654777) 05 March 2008 Would Chelsea benefit from having Amauri on board? Have you been impressed by his performances in Italy? Latest 10 commentsRead members' comments or add your own
comment by
cliveeta (U2541926) posted Mar 5, 2008 Yeah Chelsea have no debts because they have bottomless pockets, that's no way to run a biz!
comment by
Donald Donaldson (U7288238)
comment by
Cheesymunky (U5506622) posted Mar 5, 2008 Us signing Torres at 23 million was big money, but to spend 19 million for a 27 year old guy who i've never heard of before seems madness.
comment by
smokingJulian (U1562497) posted Mar 5, 2008 amauri is excellent, he is strong and can run with the ball, likes doing backheels etc. imagine flo with a few tricks up his sleeve
comment by
MASCH MASCH MASCH POTATO (U10179022) posted Mar 5, 2008 comment by Cheesymunky
comment by
cliveeta (U2541926) posted Mar 5, 2008 Chelsea dont seem to have the network of scouts who can see the next Ronaldo, Pato, Fabregas. They end up paying big money, tho Liverpool had to dig deep, but at least Torres is a class player and young!
comment by
Shevabk2milan (U9020026) posted Mar 6, 2008 Hovis Whitebread
comment by
yusuf_fofana (U9860808) posted Mar 6, 2008 I think he will be useful for us, we should be ready to give him more time to cope with the physical aspect of the game.
comment by
notstoopidjuzspecial (U10810510) posted Mar 6, 2008 ive had enough abt people banging on about chelsea's deep pockets. u lot are just jealous that roman didn't pick u and to be honest, i couldn't care less if chelsea bought 50 players for 20million each and they all turn out like shevchenko. so long as a few turn out like carvalho and drogba, u lot should zip it.
comment by
yusuf_fofana (U9860808) posted Mar 6, 2008 Can have a decent strikes say eighteen goals per season. Comment on this article |