Tyson v Holyfield III - say it ain't so...Heavy by Alex Trickett - BBC Sport (U1647736) 28 February 2008 ![]() It was with a quick chuckle and a much longer sigh that I greeted news that Evander Holyfield, 45, may fight Mike Tyson, 41, again. Latest 10 commentsRead members' comments or add your own
comment by
AmuseYourself (U10735005) posted Mar 7, 2008 Everyone always talks like all boxers are failures if they aren't remembered like Muhammed Ali.
comment by
steveobalboa (U11193422) posted Mar 7, 2008 lewis was a poor excuse for "fighter" he bottled it when anyone took the fight to him and hid behind his jab often retreating to his amatuer roots and that sort of boring fighter wont ever be remembered as a top 10 heavyweight.tyson was a true fighter in all senses and an extremely underated skillfull boxer although i am against a third fight with holyfield because the heavyweight division needs to be pushing its current fighters forward and not keep digging up past greats simply because they squandered there fortunes or because america has lost its grip on the heavyweight division.im all for the heavyweight division being capped at 17st and stick the fat lazy rest in a freak show super heavyweight division.in my opinion that would bring a lot more credibility back to the heavyweight division where the smaller heavyweights are forced to beef up to 18st plus to compete with nearly 20st fattys.tyson was the most devastating fighter of any generation who fell out of love with boxing and tarnished his legacy by fighting on through his greed for more money.
comment by
euro bubbles (U1081114) posted Mar 10, 2008 lewis was a poor excuse for "fighter" he bottled it when anyone took the fight to him and hid behind his jab often retreating to his amatuer roots and that sort of boring fighter wont ever be remembered as a top 10 heavyweight.tyson was a true fighter in all senses and an extremely underated skillfull boxer
comment by
duranbond007 (U11229270) posted Mar 11, 2008 I agree with all the people in the know and think this fight ( the word used in it's loosest possible term ) should not take place. I wont be a hypocrite and say I would'nt be intriuged to see it but let's be honest it has nothing to do with who's the best boxer. Both in their day were good fighters ( Tyson more of a brawler ) but's thats just my opinion.
comment by
smashingjamiebaby (U11235286)
comment by
Sean M (U1691763) posted Mar 14, 2008 Back to the old Tyson V Lewis debate then. These two peaked at different times. Tyson was awesome to watch in the 80's and destroyed most and beat all. He was able to go 12 rounds when needed which wasn't often i.e. Bonecrusher,Mitch Green,Ruddock. posted Mar 16, 2008 Why does everyone always think Ali is the greatest??
comment by
Showoff (U10476104)
comment by
ricardomurphi (U11411741) posted Apr 1, 2008 Superb idea .They could bill it as The Last Supper Comment on this article |