What next for England?One-day internationals England by EnglandCricket2008 (U3855244) 12 February 2008 Congratulations to New Zealand. A couple of weeks ago this Kiwi team was being written off before a ball had been bowled, requiring some real character with a number of key players missing. Well they've sure shown that! A fantastic display from them with the ball and in the field and then with the bat saw them to a ten wicket victory in only half the available overs. A thoroughly deserving victory. Latest 10 commentsRead members' comments or add your own
comment by
coolnafs (U10700462) posted Feb 13, 2008 England should do what India did a few years ago.
comment by
OldRegret (U6882370) posted Feb 13, 2008 Kiwis kicked the Ozzies backsides 3 zip and one of the games was a ten wicket loss last year in NZ. I don't think it is the end of the world to lose to that bunch of energetic hustlers and one fatboy slugger (though it was very possibly the end of Mike Hussey's captaincy career!).
comment by
tylerdurden12 (U10982875) posted Feb 13, 2008 it was a terrible performance the question is really why did mascarenhas lose his place? he was one of if not the best player in the 2020 side. So Peter Moores changed the winning team then after the side Moores picked fails he retains them. Terrible decision.
comment by
smithelbw (U10611910) posted Feb 13, 2008 I know that i have mentioned this before but have just been looking back at scorecards for the Sri Lanka Test and One day series and have found that Bell only got one score over Fifty (unless i'm mistaken) Now surely the whole thing of selection is that they choose the most in form player. But it seems that Bell is always in the team and generally dodges a lot of negative comments. I think as a few people have said one way or another, the england selectors should stop picking players on how big a player they are and on current performances.
comment by
AlexCricket (U8433240) posted Feb 13, 2008 I think Mustard has looked good if not quite the finished article. He stands well behind the sticks and has potential to make some good scores.
comment by
clearjoe100 (U2724279) posted Feb 13, 2008 Primarily what the England team need to do is to stop wishing their wicket keeper was Gilchrist! It would be far more sensible to have a specialist batsman opening the innings rather than a wicket keeper/slogger!
comment by
AndieRae (U6958918) posted Feb 13, 2008 I think it's a good article and many of the comments hit the spot too. I agree that England focus on the Ashes too much and most seem to agree that the batting focuses too much on Bell and Pietersen. Bell has not given Pietersen the support he needs for a long time and KP's batting has a permanent look of 'ok I'll do the best I can, but if I don't succeed it's about time it was someone else's turn, eh?' and it's just never Bell's turn. Pietersen likes to 'grandstand' on his own terms and he's not comfortable when it's forced upon him as these days, it invariably is. The Mustard/Prior/Foster/Uncle Tom Cobley and all thing is only important in that the England selectors must understand they reap what they sow. There are still surely ten or twelve more keepers to try out over the next four or five years...
comment by
leoPresident (U11006630) posted Feb 13, 2008 It makes me laugh/weep when Collingwood or whoever is Captain at the time rolls out the usual "we shall learn from our mistakes" quotes at the latest one day bashing only to be thrashed a couple days later due to poor play rather than anything else. Change the record, the current one is getting very worn and boring. A bit more concentration and application of the teams (limited) talents are required and remebering what they actually get handsomely paid for.
comment by
ochuckles (U11047275) posted Feb 13, 2008 4thecaptain, sorry don't know what the stats say about KP but obviously his form of late has been mediocre. Still more talented than any of the current kiwis. But, apart from KP there aren't any other strikers in there without Freddie. You won't beat the kiwis at home with a mediocre bowling attack and only one aggressive batsmen. Comment on this article |