Trouble Brewing for SA and STRFormula One by str8y,( how Klien is your house?) (U9929468) 11 February 2008 "We are of the opinion that Aguri and Toro Rosso cannot be part of F1 as per the provisions in the Concorde Agreement. Latest 10 commentsRead members' comments or add your own
comment by
rajumaverick (U8864252) posted Feb 11, 2008 AU malya wouldn't give a hoot about nationalism as he clearly showed a one finger to Narian. Its all about his image, reputation and success. In a decade Force India would be a force in F1 as this guy always starves for success in his chosen field and always wanted to be a front runner. There is no business where he was unsuccessful.
comment by
autounion (U1666237) posted Feb 11, 2008 Well, there is the irony that Narain actually drives for an Indian team ie 'Team India' in A1GP. http://www.a1teamindia.in/
comment by
Norfolkbaggie (U9241488) posted Feb 11, 2008 rajumaverick
comment by
Croydon Bob (U10277631) posted Feb 11, 2008 Damawa is correct in that there is inconsistency. The current situation is unfair. I don't understand how the FIA and the teams (who have signed up to the Concorde agreement that is apparently to blame) got themselves into this mess.
comment by
autounion (U1666237) posted Feb 11, 2008 Well I guess that's where the theory came from CB but it would have been more convincing if NK wasn't sponsored by Tata and I can't see them insisting on NK being part of any future sponsorship deal with Mallaya (given the talk of that possiblity precedes many of Mallaya's statements re; NK) with Chandhok likely to fill any percieved need for an Indian driver (apart from him deserving the seat in his own right, though it doesn't harm his case that one of Chandhok's sponsors is part of Mallaya's empire)
comment by
rajumaverick (U8864252) posted Feb 12, 2008 Norfolkbaggie right everything needs abit of luck and seems like this guy has that plenty
comment by
oppositelock (U1701117) posted Feb 13, 2008 Back to the article. There seems no valid reason why a team should not use cars made by someone else, OK I know it's the FIA that wants it that way but it means less well off teams that can't afford to design and build their own cars can't compete. F1 will become even more of a rich teams' club if the FIA has its way.
comment by
Big_Als_Dad (U1828716) posted Feb 15, 2008 The Teams who oppose the "buy and run" philosophy make the point that they spend hundreds of millions of dollars to design, manufacture, improve and race their own cars.
comment by
chrisross701 (U9899728) posted Feb 19, 2008 How is trouble brewing for STR??? They have a secure finacial backing!!! SA need the money not STR!!!!!!!!
comment by
shakerbluesman (U9307112) posted Feb 26, 2008 The UB source comment that the lesser the competition the better.Really,well its about time those who make this stupid kind of remark thought about the race goers a bit more.I bet even with less cars the cost of going wouldn,t drop,in fact almost certainly would get more expensive instead.It wasn't so many years ago there was pre race qualifying now we're moving to smaller and smaller grids.This doesn't really say much about the future of F1.The fewer the cars and boy its going to be one long boring procession.A look at the totally great racing seen these days in one of the world's most competitive race series,here I'm talking of the A1 GRAND PRIX series,which goes from strength to strength is full grids,equal cars and tyres,and almost always full grids and very very competitive races.Maybe this is the true grand prix racing of the future,at least I hope so,because after many years of following F1 the recent few years have been the least exiting and competitive I have ever seen.Lets encourage more teams in like Prodrive and fill the grids. Comment on this article
Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.
|