New Zealand - Englandby Mark Mitchener - BBC Sport (U1647645) 07 February 2008
Morning, everyone - I'll be bringing you the live text for today's second Twenty20 international between New Zealand and England in Christchurch. Latest 10 commentsRead members' comments or add your own
comment by
MarzyHyper (U10518960) posted Feb 7, 2008 “England, New Zealand, Pakistan and Bangladesh are in the tier-2 of cricket overall. They need time and consistent performances to get to top tier.”
comment by
MarzyHyper (U10518960) posted Feb 8, 2008 I notice the mods have deleted your bile-filled response, ravibala.
comment by
IndianBlade (U8471661) posted Feb 8, 2008 England lost to west indies and also the Umpires screwed india in the final ODI and the 3rd ODI so a TAINTED victory- yeah yeah all those lord fanatics- SREEshant was out!! dravid was NOT OUT so there! England full of all rounders so they are a decent ODI i would not put pakistan in the same league as INDIA at the moment as they are a terrible run. West indies, Pakistan and Sri lanka and new zealand in the same league. What is Sri lanka going to be without Murali. Pakistan are in decline and New zealand and west indies the decent inconsistent sides.
comment by
Stargazer (U2150250) posted Feb 8, 2008 England may have lost narrowly to India in a series in England (one of India's very rare away series wins against major opposition) but didn't they only draw the series in India 18 months earlier when England were barely able to field a second team.
comment by
IndianBlade (U8471661) posted Feb 8, 2008 twice took the 10th wicket... yeah much easier to get a tailender out then a world class batsman like dravid... especially dravid who would have done the business. Shouldnt even have got down to 9 wickets. Not to mention decisions went against them in the 2nd test which they still won... oh look going on about aussies 5-0 whitewash springs a memory- and you beat australia in the ODI it was a weakend side. Stopped the rot of aussies twice and deserved to do it earlier. England struggled to take 20 wickets as did sri lanka but india did it on regularly. Infact when was the last time a team scored more than 500 agaisnt aussies at there own back yrd.. india have improved as a ODI team since the world cup.. they deserved to be knocked out... still england couldnt beat a top 6 team in the world cup and struggled to beat bangladesh... loser complains about tainted victory - yeah india wasnt tainted draw because dravid wasnt out.. aussie tainted victory 2nd test because they shouldnt of even been in a winning position. nobody complained 1st test because india were outplayed and deserved to lose
comment by
Stargazer (U2150250) posted Feb 8, 2008 Dhoni is a tail-ender???
comment by
Stargazer (U2150250) posted Feb 8, 2008 If I were really being contentious, I would also mention that half of the Australian team has retired since the last Ashes. India played a much weaker Australian side that were further weakened by injuries. They deserve a lot of credit for coming back in the series, but playing against a side that would have only been the 2nd XI last winter made it easier.
comment by
IndianBlade (U8471661) posted Feb 8, 2008 oh yeah the collapse from out of nowhere second innings... fair enough ... dhoni is poor batsman than dravid and was the 1st time he played with his mind in check..
comment by
Man-of-Reason (U2124957) posted Feb 8, 2008 "England are Useless" is a term shared around our National Sporting Teams ..... 6 months ago it was the Circket, 3 months ago it was the Football (ok, can argue they've not lost the tag yet) and now the joke is on the Rugby Union boys..... Cricket will recover to it's normal status soon enough Comment on this article
Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.
|