BBC Home

Explore the BBC

New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in

330 comments

user rating: 3 star

Break up the Union!

International England
by Robbo Robson (U5722413) 04 February 2008
comment on the article
Derek 'Robbo' Robson

Every so often I give rugby union a chance.

England's heroics in the World Cup – playing the sort of game that couldn't keep even Amy Winehouse awake – at least made me think we should give some support to the lads with the red rose emblazoned on their chests.

And Lesley Vainokolo's appearance on Saturday was exciting enough as well (that's the girl's way to spell Leslie, but who's going to tell him?)

But the fact is that rugby union, for all the fuss and splendour and big hits, is just an INCREDIBLY boring game.

I know you won't agree, men of Harlech. I'm sure you love watching dopey Englishmen handling the ball like they were frightened of chipping a nail.

But here's what I think's rubbish about it:

1. Penalties – why are they given? Most of the time you don't know and the ref's guessing. When a scrum collapses the combined talents of Poirot, Ms Marple and flippin' Dangermouse couldn't come to a rational decision.

2. Most fouls are given away in what they call the contact areas. These are places on the field where it is quite acceptable to have a public school pile-on.

Inside this seething mass of bodies, ears are chewed, eyes are gouged and occasionally a rugby ball is found.

The worst thing about these contact areas is the great chasms of time when the scrum-half, ideally small and really annoying - and in Peter Stringer's case the spit of an organ-grinder's monkey – stands around with the ball at his feet pointing this way and that like an agitated meerkat. Use the bloody thing!

3. The line-out – too much flailing around if you ask me. It's not much less than a pillow-fight for grown-ups.

4. All that crap about releasing the ball or holding on versus keeping hold of the man or rolling away. The laws are so pigging convoluted and difficult to understand, let alone obey.

The art of rugby, it seems to me, is to see how much you can get away with.

Probably the saving grace about rugby union is the fansDerek 'Robbo' Robson

5. The 'handbags at 20 paces' baloney that the ex-players like to trot out. There's a lot of people around rugby union who quite happily chuckle away when some lock-forward takes out his opposite number with a right cross and a head-butt – but would advocate hanging if two yobbos went for the same tactic in a pub car park.

6. The sheer size of these blokes.

I like the Welsh lad Shane Williams 'cos he almost looks like a part of the human race. Most of them look like they’ve walked out of a comic book. If you had to pass one of these monsters on the street it'd put a good quarter of a mile on your journey.

I can foresee an episode of Doctor Who where the lad Tennant gets all bug-eyed 'cos the world has been taken over by seek-and-
destroy rugby players and there's only enough room on the planet for 42 of them.

7. If you’re lucky you’ll see some slick French hands (a phrase that has me missus shuffling in her seat somewhat) but basically it's a lot of incredible hulks in over-stuffed lycra crashing into each other.

It's stock-car racing with the vehicles replaced by giant bags of supervits, testosterone and scar tissue. Worst of all, it rewards negativity over and over again.

Probably the saving grace about rugby union is the fans, who not only somehow manage to tolerate this stodgy fare, but do so with a good-natured sportsmanship that the less evolved part of football's tribe could learn a lot from.

(If there's one thing that's really got me goat in the last couple of weeks, it's the worry that we can't mark the death of 23 young people on a plane some 50 years ago 'cos there are a few sub-literate ogres who can't bring themselves to be quiet for one minute of their lives out of respect. I tell you, it's downright shameful.)

Regular readers will know I prefer to watch rugby league every time. You don't need a degree in corporate tax law to understand the rules.

The emphasis is all on keeping the ball moving so you don't have passages of play that look less like sport and more like a bunch of randy bullfrogs in the breeding season. Any nonsense and you're off, pretty much.

They need to change the rules of union quick. Ideally, two less players per side, no line-outs, six tackles and return possession to the other team...that sort of thing.

I might still watch the All Blacks or the French at their best, but the rest... forget it. If I want to watch artificially-enhanced lumps bumping into each other, I'll get a Teletubbies DVD.

Latest 10 comments

Read members' comments or add your own

posted Feb 7, 2008

Soccer is a gentlemen's game played by thugs and Rugby is a thugs game played by gentlemen... enuf said.

Poor article and quite narrow minded imo

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Feb 7, 2008

Well bless my cotton socks - something I never knew, Edwards captained England RU.

What a shame he never played for the senior team.

Then again it's a good job really - he wasn't that good at conversions during his career, he was too busy scoring tries, running & passing - like all good RL stand offs.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Feb 8, 2008

Hmmm. I feel i should get out my thesaurus to find some more words other than drivel and absolute rubbish to describe this article. You clearly dont understand the game. "They need to change the rules of union quick"? The rules are just fine, why should we substitute them for rules to suit a group of people who dont have a clue, of which you seem to be one? Poor article and very uninformed. I would expect more from a BBC pundit than a ignorant view such as this, i dont know what you ussually write about but i would suggest you stick to that.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Feb 8, 2008

Anyone, like your dear Robbo, who suggests that Saturday's Rugby match between England and Wales was boring, yet tunes in to watch England's dire football performance and can stomach it for a full 90 minutes needs both a brain and eye transplant. Yes England lost, but the match was hardly lacking excitement. If you don't understand the game don't criticise it, and then choose to jump on the convoy of band wagons when things start to go well.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Feb 8, 2008

Hairbearboyos, you clearly have no idea of what is going on in the world of Rugby Union if you believe that the rules are 'just fine'. The senior administrators of the game obviously do not agree with you, which is why they are currently experimenting with massive rule changes in Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa, many of which WILL be implemented globally. Reading elements of this thread might enlighten you.
Rugby Union of course does not have rules, but, rather pretentiously, has laws. However, most of the (4 billion) armchair viewers of the RUWC and 6 Nations have no idea what these laws are, and also fail to notice when they are changed each year. If you want to challenge this notion, when a penalty is next awarded in a 6 Nations game, ask the 3 people closest to you why it was awarded, and you will get 3 different answers. This rule is univerally applicable, such that even if the 3 people closest to you happen to be Phil Vickery, Lawrence Dallaglio and the referee, it is invariable.

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by Glenn A (U2665157)

posted Feb 9, 2008

Hear hear, Robbo, I absolutely detest this complicated, boring and violent game and wish the BBC could have lost the rights to rugby union so they could keep England matches and the FA Cup, which attract far more viewers. If rugby union is so great, how come all the sports talk on a Monday at work is about the premiership and almost none about the rugby equivalent. Rugby union is like paint drying and the players get more female attention than they deserve.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Feb 9, 2008

I apologise SmokingJoeFrasier you are right, the rules are far from perfect and i am aware of the changes being tested currently. I think i was unclear in what i meant though. The main point of that statement was to say that we should not have to change the rules so drastically as 'Robbo' is suggesting to entertain peoples such as him. i hope my view has been made clearer nowsmiley

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by U737320

posted Feb 23, 2008

The RFU has 1.5 million registered rugby players - they can't all be toffs, it's just not possible.
We used to have a regular easter term football game against a nearby public school (I went to a comp in a very middle class part of surrey). They had amazing facilities, and you can call them soft all you want, but the physique and speed of some of those public schoolboys at age 16 was something you just didn't see playing other comps.
I don't know what it was, something in the food? Soggy biscuit games?
Maybe that also has something to do with their dominance in rugby? They weren't too hot at football though - dirty as hell.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 3, 2008

1.5 million players registered, so 1 in 20 of the population play rugby union???? The good old union calculator in action again.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 3, 2008

1.5 million players registered, so 1 in 20 of the population play rugby union???? The good old union calculator in action again

Think you need to go back and do your sums as that is nonsense!! hahahahahahaahahahahahaha Try harder!!

add comment | complain about this comment

Comment on this article


RATE THIS ARTICLE

Rate Breakdown

  • 5 40.77%
    53 votes
  • 4 2.31%
    3 votes
  • 3 1.54%
    2 votes
  • 2 1.54%
    2 votes
  • 1 53.85%
    70 votes

average rating:
2.75 from 130 votes