BBC Home

Explore the BBC

New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in
Browse: Tennis

171 comments

user rating: 4 star

Tsonga shocks the world

comment on the article

Nadal looked confused, bewildered and, at times, just plain angry.

There can rarely have been a more comprehensive dismantling of a world number two's game than the one Jo-Wilfried Tsonga handed Nadal on Thursday.

He made the three-time French Open champion look one dimensional, under-powered and half-a-step slow - impossible accusations until now.

Ranked 38 in the world, the 22-year-old Frenchman won 6-2 6-3 6-2 to reach a maiden Grand Slam final that no-one, not even he, can possibly have imagined when he beat Andy Murray in round one 10 days ago.

"Wherever Andy is watching this, he must be feeling pretty good at the moment," said BBC Sport commentator Sam Smith.

"Good" might be stretching it, but the British number one's first-round defeat can now be viewed in a very different light.

Tsonga's often remarked upon resemblance to Muhammad Ali is taking on a new dimension as, increasingly confident, he swaggers around the court and works the crowd like the great man himself.

But it is his game that has really taken the tennis world by storm and of all the comparisons that have been flying around, Pete Sampras is the name that sticks out.

The American's game was built on a fearsome serve, huge forehand, instinctive volleys and athleticism around the net - the very things that have carried Tsonga so far in Melbourne.

Add to that an apparent invulnerability to nerves and you have a pretty daunting prospect for either Roger Federer or Novak Djokovic in Sunday's final.

The smart money says it will be Federer and that the Swiss will find a way to win - he always does - but Tsonga will pose an unfamiliar challenge in a world of baseliners.

If it is to be Federer he at least has recent experience of facing the man who laid down the blueprint for Tsonga, having taken on Sampras in three exhibition matches at the end of last year.

Of course the bad news for the world number one is that he lost the last of those matches - and Sampras is 14 years older than Tsonga.

You will not find this writer backing against Federer just yet, but if the Frenchman were to take the title it would complete surely the most remarkable story in a men's Grand Slam since Becker won Wimbledon in 1985, or Goran in 2001.

Ali once said he was going to "shock the world". In his own way, Tsonga is doing just that.

Your thoughts please...

Latest 10 comments

Read members' comments or add your own

posted Jan 24, 2008

Tsonga had a devastating night with that mighty forehand.
The incredible power and depth consistently prevented Nadal from playing his game. Also he punished Nadal's second serve. However, I would like to see the error count on the backhand side. Nadal was unable to consistently keep him on the weaker side and this was his demise. Tsonga stepped in and hit the looping topspin returns of Nadal on the rise. It reminded me of Federer's win at Hamburg.
Whoever Tsonga plays in the final, they will not have missed these features of his game and will have a strategy to cope with it.
He is still in with a great chance and what a breath of fresh air for tennis.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 24, 2008

I'm sure Tsonga played brilliantly today ( I didnt see the match) but the drawing of comparisons with Sampras from what it says in the article is complete nonsense. Anyone who watched sampras knows his game wasnt built on a huge forehand, indeed if the sampras game had a weakness it was the forehand, why do you think he never won the french?

As a professional sports journalist how can Piers Newbery possibly not know that?

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by nedsram (U1808054)

posted Jan 24, 2008

When Andy Murray drew Tsonga in the first round, I immediately thought that this was the worst possible draw for him. Until now, Tsonga has been a brilliant talent marred by the tendency to fall horribly apart. Having said that, I did think that Andy would have problems with his sometimes scattergun approach. What Jo-Wilfried has proved in this tournament is that he has found a way to harness his incredible talent consistently. As to how he gets on in the final, I suspect that the occasion will finally get to him. After he beat Rafa, he seemed to be in a trance, until the reality that he had comprehensively demolished the world number two finally sank in.

As to who he will meet in the final, I'll take Roger. I suspect that Djokovic will not be up to the occasion. I hope Roger wins, as I do like to see history made, and he is an exceptional talent.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 24, 2008

Well, for me youīve hit it spot on - it showed Nadalīs game up for what it was - Iīve always thought of Nadal as a robot - same, same, same - and I think back to what a dreadful season he had two years ago. The word one-dimensional is right - thatīs what he is. I donīt think he is going to achieve much more in Tennis than he has already - he just hasnīt got the potential. However, I keep saying he should ditch his uncle and change his coach - it might produce different results.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 25, 2008

The Fed is still the man!!! Come on Rog. To much hype about Tsonga. Yes, we can all see he's very talanted but Nadal is ordinary on anything over than clay. I'm sorry Novak fans but I can't stand the bloke, he's very consistent but doesn't have that extra something.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 25, 2008

Wazza_The_White_Pele
beer drinkers do not see things like wine drinkers

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 25, 2008

Hey hey! I can't see Federer conquering Tsonga in the final now.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 25, 2008

What mind games?
Nadal was very gracious in defeat.
And he played the match like a true pro that he is . Despite being humiliated.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 25, 2008

This particular comment or contribution should be highlited on the BBC sports page as a recorded account and demonstration of the magic, spookiness and acuracy of certain weird dreams that our crazy minds are capable of.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 25, 2008

The comment by leconsoler on 24th of January in which Federer's defeat was predicted, following right on the heels of Nadal's defeat, should be highlited on the BBC sports page as a recorded account and demonstration of the magic, spookiness and acuracy of certain weird but premonitory dreams that our crazy minds are capable of.
Interestingly, the dreamer was barred from placing a bet by the dream demons

add comment | complain about this comment

Comment on this article

Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.

RATE THIS ARTICLE

Rate Breakdown

  • 5 57.58%
    19 votes
  • 4 15.15%
    5 votes
  • 3 3.03%
    1 votes
  • 2 9.09%
    3 votes
  • 1 15.15%
    5 votes

average rating:
3.91 from 33 votes