Browse: Cricket Brilliant Australia or spineless India?by Oliver Brett - BBC Sport (U1779520) 06 January 2008 ![]() It took one of the most extraordinary Tests of all, India’s 2001 come-from-behind win in Calcutta, to end the last run of 16 consecutive victories by Australia. Australia’s hunger for success is a stronger force than the desire of other teams to deny them that success It's clear that Test cricket is again crying out for a team to emerge as a valid challenger to the Aussies. For the moment, Indian fans will doubtless complain about two outrageous umpiring decisions in the course of the match by Steve Bucknor, both involving Andrew Symonds. His refusal to give Symonds caught behind despite a clear edge averted a major crisis for Australia on the first day – and the batsman went on to hit 162 not out. Four days later, Bucknor gave Rahul Dravid out, caught behind off Symonds, when bat and gloves were locked behind his pads. Dravid is India’s best blocker when a match needs to be saved, but he was cruelly denied the opportunity. Fate – or Bucknor - had dealt the Indian cricket team a raw deal in the Test, but with Kumble batting so stoutly at one end the draw they surely deserved was there for the taking. The batsmen around him failed to show the steel needed to deny Australia victory, however. Mahendra Dhoni padded up to Symonds, Harbhajan could only last 14 balls and when RP Singh fell for a first-ball duck he walked off the wicket with a smile on his face. He did not look crestfallen, as one might have assumed, as an Australia would surely have done. And therein lies the difference between the Baggy Greens and the other Test sides. Australia’s hunger for success is a stronger force than the desire of other teams to deny them that success. Just how many consecutive wins will Ponting’s team seize now? Latest 10 commentsRead members' comments or add your own
comment by
HKSCHD (U10790899) posted Jan 10, 2008 Hunger of Ausies is so much that they surely did something to umpires. If umpires were not giving the decisions in favour of Ausies they had lost this match.
comment by
Superglammy (U9457502) posted Jan 10, 2008 Agreed,they should remember that there are two teams out there.
comment by
ashamock (U8505143) posted Jan 17, 2008 CMON PEARLSASWINGER AND NOTACHUCKER!
comment by
(U000786©) (U8527600) posted Jan 17, 2008 ashamock-
comment by
ashamock (U8505143) posted Jan 17, 2008 So much for India being all out under 42 eh?
comment by
ashamock (U8505143) posted Jan 17, 2008 PEARLSASWINGER..........
comment by
(U000786©) (U8527600)
comment by
baranasai (U8923244) posted Jan 22, 2008 What you Have said has come true /India has prooeved their worth. Indians showed that they can alos win matches agaianst Aussies Comment on this article
Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.
|