posted Jan 9, 2008

comment by themainone
posted 1 Hour Ago

ok i read some comments by people on here.

ok so say liverpool gave the gate money to luton, but then they go out of existence anyway, so liverpool have just lost 100k for nothing.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Good Someone’s brought this thread back on topic .
Although it would appear he is in serious pre-mod looking at the time of his post.

I agree, and also what about Boston and Leeds, wouldn't they both have a case of crying 'foul'? No other club helped them out when they were in similar situations.

It's all very well giving gate money to lower clubs in pre-season friendlies, but this is mid-season and in a competitive match.

I still believe LFC were correct in declining Luton’s Administrators (note NOT the club, the Administrators) offer.

Had LFC agreed it would have set, what in the future could be, a very dangerous precedent.

I do not know, but there may even be FA and League rules covering this. Does anyone know, for certain?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 9, 2008

Manchester United the Incredibles What's happening tomorrow?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 9, 2008

Why should we donate money to a captain who punched holes in his own ship
------------------------
Ok so luton messed up, however they are an established league club and to see them disappear off the footballing map would be a terriable thin to be honest. It would be a good spirited gesturte if liverpool were to do so, considering that they spend, 500% more than luton are asking for in the transfer window.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 9, 2008

look

if luton screwed up their finances that is their fault not anyone elses

get your priorties right

luton fans were spitting at carra ang threw beer at him for doing nothing wrong

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 9, 2008

yeh; Irememberdallyduncan as well,Hope you keep up his good name

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 9, 2008

Is this thread going to last forever.
Things have moved on the past is done.
NO MORE PLEASE!!!!!!!!

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 9, 2008

comment by Gelleh

It's a good thing you are a minority because being ill educated, ignorant and blind
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As you've obviously claim to have better eyesight than me, maybe you can look at the slow motion replay at the end of the video clip below and tell me which part of JAR body the ball came off before going into the goal?
And which part of his body it came off before it struck the part of his body in the answer above?
http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid958992159?bctid=1367653820

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 11, 2008

Serious question here people.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/l/luton_town/7181317.stm

Could this have been avoided if Liverpool had sent Luton its check earlier this week for Luton's share of next week's gate?

Will Tuesday's game be a breeze for Liverpool as a result of Luton's depleted squad?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 11, 2008

comment by Jonny_Los_Angeles
posted 2 Hours Ago

Serious question here people.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/l/luton_town/7181317.stm

Could this have been avoided if Liverpool had sent Luton its check earlier this week for Luton's share of next week's gate?

Will Tuesday's game be a breeze for Liverpool as a result of Luton's depleted squad?

-----------------------

What's your point Jonny? Scheming Liverpool thought to themselves "If we give Luton £100,000, and if there's a replay, they won't have to sell half a million quids worth of players"?

Ir anything, it proves that £100,000 would merely have been throwing a stone at a tidal wave.

add comment | complain about this comment