BBC Home

Explore the BBC

New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in
Browse: Golf PGA Tour

8 comments

user rating: 4 star

PGA Tour: Tiger's Target

PGA Tour
by kwiniaskagolfer (U6520188) 11 December 2007
comment on the article

Tiger Woods hasn't been seen on the world's golf circuits since being beaten by Mike Weir at the Presidents Cup, but he hits the bullseye with another star-infested field for his annual "Target World Challenge".

Despite some totally bizarre scheduling by the eminent golfing gurus of South Africa and Australia, whose respective Open Championships are also being contested this week, there is a competitive field to tee it up with Tiger.

The eight Europeans will take home a minimum prize of $170K, even if they finish last. Good for Justin Rose, Casey, Stenson, Fasth, Westwood, Mongomerie, and former winners Padraig and Luke Donald; by and large pro golfers earn their money, but isn't it more palatable when they are straightforward about their motivation?

Phil Mickelson has earned considerable scepticism, for instance, by pleading with Timmy Finchem for the regular season to end earlier, then going off to Asia to play tournaments for guaranteed money.

Regardless, there will doubtless be an entertaining event for the TV audience. Unfortunately, it will all be played out before small, well-heeled galleries which may make one wish our golfing elite were pleasing the crowds at New Orleans or Milwaukee, Holland or Italy, where their expertise would doubtless be better appreciated.

At this stage, I can't tell whether the Tiger Target dishes out World Ranking points, but let's hope not.

But the Nedbank event rewarded Trevor Immelman with 34 points, even though the field was only twelve strong and competition in the last round was essentially a two-horse race with most of the rest hacking it around.

Isn't this typical of most limited field events? Competitive for the front-runners, but the rest playing their final rounds just for the guaranteed prize money?

This is where the emphasis on World Ranking points has got it wrong. Players are rewarded for participating and, below the top two or three, not for performance.

It's no fun picking on players when they're down but Retief Goosen's season is a case in point. His best finish in a full-field event since the Masters is 15th in Asia, no top 20 finishes in Europe or the US.

Yet Goosen picked up ranking points for finishing LAST at Nedbank, losing in the first round at Wentworth's World Match Play and, in March, for finishing 58th in Doral's WGC tournament. Losers in the first round of the WGC Match Play also received points, just for showing up. Daft.

In this world where World Ranking Points are often the pre-eminent currency, crucial for entry to Majors and WGC events, does it make sense to dish out points for failure?

This observer would suggest that sponsors are fully entitled to reward golfers as they deem fit, but Ranking Points should be above all that. Even if only half the field received points, the top six at Nedbank for instance, first round winners at match play events, it would at least recognise achievement rather than failure.

Food for thought?

Latest comments

Read members' comments or add your own

posted Dec 11, 2007

PS: All reports, including by the BBC yesterday, stated Justin Rose was playing in the Tiger tournament. But I don't see his name among the latest announcements of Thursday's field.

Has Rose withdrawn with an injury? There doesn't seem to be much information available about his participation. Or not.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 12, 2007

I saw that as well. I went on to the web site and justin's name isn't there?????

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by macatac (U4376675)

posted Dec 13, 2007

Perhaps Tigger is scared of the worlds form player and currently the only guy who can putt like Tigger too!

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 13, 2007

Kwin .... dont get hooked up on world rankings. They are a joke. The manipulation of the rankings over many years shows how false they are. On world rankings the Ryder cup is a walk over everytime..mm..no, actually they are living proof that despite teeing up against their supposed better ranked players ... the "lower rankers" of Europe victories highlight the sham rankings.

Stewart Cink was in the top 20 for years...how? ... now after a few good results Steve Stricker is ranked 4... what a joke

As regards Justin ... I believe that his back is playing him up again and hes skipped the event.. shame as he might nearly have won given his recent form

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 13, 2007

welloffside, I think we agree. The only reason I get aggravated about them is that they are the entry ticket to Majors / WGC's.

The point that I was trying to make is that the World Rankings are structured to help the smallish "cartel" of golfers, "Make sure the rich get richer", as the well-worn phrase describes.

Of course, once a player slips below the top forty or fifty, he really starts to plummet unless his slide can be arrested. Clarke, Howell, Chad Campbell, DLIII to name but four, with others such as Goosen, Toms, Luke Donald destined to slip quickly unless they can turn it round.

Cink and Stricker, and to a lesser extent Justin Rose (agree about his fitness) beneficiaries of high finishes in Majors / WGC events but few w's.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 13, 2007

I agree, the system of rankings is a joke. I think that points should be awarded for placings in tournaments regardless of the prize money. This would force the " elite " to play in most tournaments and reward the promoters and the public for supporting some of the " minors ". I would think that Woods would still be number one but the rankings of the rest of the golfers would be radically different.

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by Golfbug (U1702519)

posted Dec 13, 2007

"Tiger says no.."

We didn't really expect Tiger to take part, but we will see the top European Tour players, playing the Tour more often.

Their should be more World Golf events in Europe, America should not have them all.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 17, 2007

Here's the thing about the World Rankings: It doesn't really affect anything important. Remember, a tournament like the one Tiger won this past weekend is just a silly-season event. Does anyone really think the top players in the world aren't at all four majors? It surely doesn't impact Europe fielding the best team for the Ryder Cup.

add comment | complain about this comment

Comment on this article

Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.

RATE THIS ARTICLE

Rate Breakdown

  • 5 80.00%
    4 votes
  • 4
    0 votes
  • 3
    0 votes
  • 2
    0 votes
  • 1 20.00%
    1 votes

average rating:
4.20 from 5 votes