BBC Home

Explore the BBC

New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in

25 comments

user rating: 4 star

The drug rules don't work, time to fix them

comment on the article
Drugs in sport

Imagine a world where a large international sports event is held, over 1,000 drugs tests are conducted to make sure everybody is playing fair and nobody is caught cheating.

Let’s call this place the 2007 World Athletics Championships, which were held in Osaka two months ago.

Now let’s imagine a different place where a large international sports event is held, half the participants think the other half is on drugs and nobody is caught because the tests are practically useless.

Let’s call this world the real world.

The IAAF, world athletics’ governing body, tested 926 athletes in Japan and took 1,060 blood and urine samples. There was only one “adverse result” and that came from a sample taken before the championships actually started.

But the problem is nobody really thinks French hurdler Naman Keita was the only athlete in Osaka to have been tempted by a pharmaceutical shortcut.

Professor Peter Sonksen, a leading international expert on drugs in sport, told BBC Sport that anecdotal evidence suggests half of the world’s elite track and field athletes have taken banned performance-enhancing drugs.

news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/fro...

Balco founder Victor Conte, the man behind the biggest doping scandal in sports history, clearly comes at this subject from a very different starting point to Sonksen, but his estimate of the problem’s size is exactly the same.

news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/fro...

And a recent survey of Olympic-calibre athletes from Germany – done using an anonymous web-based method – threw up some very depressing data. When it comes to athletics, a minimum of 38% (and perhaps as many as 65%) of the Olympians questioned had doped.

But can we blame them?

The best method the authorities currently have to deal with HGH is to catch somebody red-handed
Wouldn’t you be tempted to level the playing field a bit if you thought the blokes in lanes three, five, six and eight were relying on more than just their God-given talent and work ethic?

Because that is what happens when you rely on a flawed testing system that catches only the careless and stupid. Any cheat who knows what they’re doing can play the system with impunity and watch the medals, prize money and sponsorships pile up.

The “whereabouts” system? Easy peasy. Tell the testers to come around to your house first thing. You could have taken a shot of human growth hormone before bedtime and still have a very good chance of beating the current test for that very popular drug.

And if you don’t want to take that risk you can just stick your head out of the bedroom window, tell the testers you’ll be down in a minute and take whatever “precautions” your coach/chemist told you to take to spoil your sample.

Random out-of-competition testing? Yes, that works, but only when it really is random and out-of-competition.

Only the biggest/richest nations can afford genuine testing regimes so the rest rely on the international governing bodies to do their policing for them, which means a huge number of random, out-of-competition tests are nothing of the sort. They are very predictable tests taken during the competitive season.

The current test for human growth hormone? No, sorry, that doesn’t work at all. Well, only if you were stupid enough to have a quick top-up before your race.

The best method the authorities currently have to deal with this very, very effective performance-enhancing drug is to catch somebody red-handed. This is how Chinese swimmer Yuan Yuan was tripped up on the way to the 1991 world championships in Perth.

Actor Sylvester Stallone would make the same mistake 16 years later when he was caught with 48 vials of Chinese-made Jintropin at Sydney Airport.

He should have just ordered some off the internet and waited for it in the post. That’s what we did (just to prove we could, of course).

I’m not sure we actually did get Jintropin from our source in Jakarta – I “met” him in a weightlifting chat room – but we definitely got 11 vials of something, three syringes and a dirty white sports sock, used, presumably, to protect our PEDs in the post.

It’s difficult not to be cynical about doping and elite sport when you hear the likes of Conte and Sonksen tell you HGH use is rife and the good guys are still losing the battle
We don’t actually intend to use them (and it would be illegal for me to supply them to somebody else, so don’t ask) but anybody that does want them, and can afford them, can have them. They’re readily available.

According to Sonksen, an advisor on doping to the IOC, UK Sport and Wada, sport hasn’t moved very far on the HGH detection front since Yuan Yuan got busted.

The frustrating thing for him is that the science is out there to move things on considerably. He knows this because the IOC asked him to find it in 1996 and he delivered a workable test three years later.

His report is still gathering dust somewhere at Olympic HQ, while he refines, tweaks and waits for the powers-that-be to give him the green light to get on with catching cheats.

When I asked him if IOC/Wada didn’t like his test because they were worried what they might find, the professor smiled and said, in his best House of Cards impression, “You might say that; I couldn’t possibly comment.”

That line, first heard on British television around the time Yuan Yuan came a cropper, has since entered the public lexicon as an example of arch cynicism.

And it’s difficult not to be cynical about doping when you hear the likes of Conte, Sonksen and others (who wished to remain nameless) tell you HGH use is rife and the good guys are still losing the battle.

So come on, IOC. Come on, Wada. Let’s ditch “whereabouts” and move to genuinely random, targeted testing. And let’s use the best tests science can provide.

Fans demand it, worried parents want it and clean athletes deserve it.

Latest 10 comments

Read members' comments or add your own

posted Nov 20, 2007

Whilst there is large amounts of money at stake for competitors and sponsors alike, especially the Olympics, there will NO change in the drug testing. You can just see the Chinese Olympics competitors and their coaches rubbing their hands and counting the 'golds' already! Remember the Chinese Swimming cheats in Sydney.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Nov 20, 2007

I wonder if WADA will now have the teeth to do anything about drugs in sport after the shambles the appointment of its new president was....

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by gj1962 (U9987557)

posted Nov 20, 2007

I personally would condone a life ban on drug cheats and stripping of all medals and records from their whole career. However, I'm not sure that this would stop cheating.

Ponder this if you will. Assuming all of you reading this drive a car the chances are that you will deliberately drive too fast the next time you drive. You know it's wrong but you also know that you probably won't get caught. The benefits to you of breaking the law are that you get to work a whole 30 seconds sooner and that's about it. The downside is that you might get caught, might lose your licence, kill yourself or worst of all kill someone else. This doesn't stop YOU however.

If a drug cheat doesn't get caught and breaks a world record fame and fortune beckons. The downside is health issues or death and (if you're caught) humiliation.

The overwhelming majority of you won't stop doing something that is breaking the law and a danger to yourself and other people. Why on earth do you think an athlete is going to stop doing something that benefits THEM far greater than driving too fast benefits YOU?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Nov 25, 2007

There is nothing faintly amusing in Dick Pound's outpourings in his time as WADA president. The fight against doping in sport is a serious issue and is not helped by having a sensationalist buffoon at the helm.

For the last eight years Dick Pound has focussed on cycling for his own questionable reasons, complete with numerous inaccurate claims, with the result that every other sport with a doping problem (and there are plenty) has breathed a sigh of relief and decided the best thing to do is keep their heads down and sweep the issue under the carpet. Look at
Operacion Puerto - whose fault is it that other sports have been given an 18 month breathing space? Step forward Mr Pound.

Unfortunately, journalists including yourself have followed this fact-free well trodden path. I e-mailed you twice to suggest you covered the issue of doping in sports other than cycling - I suggested athletics for starters and even mentioned the name of Marion Jones. But no, you just followed the other sheep and missed out big time.

Eight wasted years under Mr Pound. Now we can finally get on with things properly in the fight against doping. Please tell me the rumours about him being in line for president of CAS are a sick joke.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 13, 2007

Why are drugs in Sport an Issue? Why do we care so much about catching cheats? More pertinently how much money is spent/wasted on drug testing?
I really can't fathom why we care so much about what athletes and other sportsmen do to reach their level of performance.
Let them take what they want!! Everything they take comes from the advancement of human science, just like their training techniques and knowledge of nutrition etc. Whats the big deal? If its a level playing field we want, well it already is!! Everyone has the option to take drugs or not to, with that choice the playing field is level. If you chose not to well cest la vie but you shouldn't complain about the money that's passing you by.
I think sports are made better by drugs not worse. I love Rugby because the players are all so big, fast and powerful, it really adds to the spectacle. Another favourite of mine is American Football, which without the super freak athletes it has playing it, would be nothing like the game it is.
Finally, and perhaps this is a tad petty, but its nice to think that if someone is going to earn a grotesquely large salary, in a world full of starving people, for playing a game they should at least have had to experienced some kind of real personal hardship to warrant it. The decision to take drugs to reach the level required before mega wages are paid and the fear of side effects from taking them, just about makes up for the sick amounts of money their drug taking can earn them.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Dec 13, 2007

"It's quite simple, really. Three Rules:

1: To participate in a world-class, international sporting event a country must provide unrestricted access to it's atheletes for a single, global, drugs-testing unit.

2: The Athelete must ensure that they notify this new unit of their entire diary, and any changes to it. They must be available for random drugs tested, with only 2 hours notice, at any time.

3: All atheletes will undergo screening daily, from eight weeks prior to a major, international event."
--------------------------------------

And you haven't the slightest idea how much this would cost. Let's jsut all double our annual tax bill shall we ?
spending billions on this rubbish, while others can't eat properly, or get proper health care ... what next ?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 4, 2008

i always go to the opposite way of thinking on this topic, let EVERYONE take what they want. at least this way it would be totally even playing field, and people stay sports are to test the limits that the human body can reach, surely if nature gave us the brains to invent these drugs then they should be used to bring the human body to its full potential. just somethig to get you thinking

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Feb 16, 2008

Everyone who has been an elite athlet knows that doping is a common - even "mandatory" - practice, accepted by institutions, governments, coaches, even athlets etc..
Gold medals count much more than fair games.
Doping has never been really fighted, because of the huge business interests backing that bad practice.
Most people who has tried to fight doping - be him an athlet or a manager - from inside the institutions has lost his job and his sport career.
I believe a way to fight that phenomenon could be mandating a sort of "athlet blood passport", being a disclosure of all relevant blood data on an on going basis during the year prior to the competition.
It would not cost more than a pair of new shoes. The cost argument is inconsistent.
Prevention is the only way to fight doping. Ex-post controls do not grant fair games.



add comment | complain about this comment

comment by robius3 (U2202417)

posted Aug 21, 2008

Athletes who are caught cheating once, come back after a ban, need to go on testing probation for the rest of their sporting careers. So they get tested each month for every drug and doping technique on the planet. THis would have picked Bonski up and acted as a deterent.

add comment | complain about this comment

Comment on this article

Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.

RATE THIS ARTICLE

Rate Breakdown

  • 5 70.00%
    7 votes
  • 4 10.00%
    1 votes
  • 3
    0 votes
  • 2
    0 votes
  • 1 20.00%
    2 votes

average rating:
4.10 from 10 votes