BBC Home

Explore the BBC

New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in
Browse: Baseball

75 comments

user rating: 4 star

World Series preview and 2007 season review

comment on the article
Boston pitcher Josh Beckett and Colorado outfielder Matt Holliday

Baseball has always been a game which has revelled in its history - and this year's World Series, which begins in Boston on Wednesday, pits together two teams both looking to make a little history of their own.

The American League pennant was won on Sunday evening by the Boston Red Sox, who are chasing a second world title in four years - and the Fenway fans may be glad that their 2004 triumph finally appeared to have shaken off the so-called Curse of the Bambino a mere 84 years after trading Babe Ruth to their arch-rival New York Yankees.

It was not the easiest of progressions this year, either - but the Sox showed their grit by battling back from 3-1 down to overcome the Cleveland Indians 4-3 in the AL Championship Series.

By contrast, their opponents - the Colorado Rockies - have only been in existence since 1993 when they entered the National League as an expansion franchise. Though not weighed down by generation-spanning "curses", this is only the second time the Rockies have reached the post-season.

The Denver-based side fell at the first hurdle in 1995, bowing out to Atlanta - and this time, despite a strong finish in September, they needed an extra game to qualify for the National League wildcard spot, having an identical record to NL West rivals San Diego Padres over the 162 regular season games. Colorado won that game in extra innings, after firing three runs in the 13th.

Since then, their progress has been the stuff of dreams - sweeping the Philadelphia Phillies 3-0 and crushing the Arizona Diamondbacks (who themselves had swept the Chicago Cubs) 4-0, giving them the luxury of an eight-day rest before the World Series begins on Wednesday.

It seems fitting that the rookie Rockies are making their first World Series appearance, after a season which was peppered by records and milestones.

The Giants showed there is no room for sentiment in the modern game by announcing they would not be offering Barry Bonds a new contract
The rest of the baseball world paled into insignificance in early August when San Francisco Giants slugger Barry Bonds finally broke Hank Aaron's record of 755 career home runs. Big Barry is very much a polarising figure - and the script had obviously been written that he would set the new record in San Francisco, in front of his own fans, who feel he has been unfairly hounded over persistent claims that he used steroids.

Bonds has never tested positive for drug use and has always denied knowingly taking performance-enhancing substances, although his personal trainer Greg Anderson was handed a three-month prison sentence in 2005 for his part in the Balco doping scandal.

However, Bonds' critics may have the last laugh after it was announced that the ball with which he broke the record is to be branded with an asterisk by its owners before it is donated to the Hall of Fame, by way of casting doubt over the validity of the record.

And the Giants - having basked in the media attention of Bonds' home run race for the last few years - showed there is no room for sentiment in the modern game, by announcing that they would not be offering Bonds a new contract. He is likely to move to the American League as a designated hitter.

However, Bonds was not the only big bopper carving his name into history in 2007, as three players - Alex "A-Rod" Rodriguez, Frank Thomas and Jim Thome all passed 500 career home runs.

Elsewhere, New York Mets pitcher Tom Glavine reached 300 career wins, San Diego Padres closer Trevor Hoffman passed 500 saves, while veteran second baseman Craig Biggio, who retired at the end of the campaign, reached 3,000 career hits in what was the highlight of an otherwise lousy season for his Houston Astros.

Indeed, of the four teams to reach the World Series in 2005 and 2006, only last year's finalists Detroit finished with a winning record, although they failed to make the play-offs - while 2005 winners Chicago White Sox and runners-up Houston both had poor seasons, as did 2006 winners St Louis.

The season's out-and-out "chokers" were undoubtedly the Mets, who threw away a seemingly unassailable lead in the NL East and were pipped to the title by Philadelphia's late charge. Perennial play-off contenders Atlanta could only finish third in that division - although collectors of sports trivia will have been delighted to see Braves manager Bobby Cox break the record for the highest number of ejections in MLB history.

The Mets' city rivals fared little better, as the Yankees overcame a slow start to claw their way back into the AL wild card place, only to fall to Cleveland in the first round of the play-offs. With manager Joe Torre's departure now confirmed, several other top players likely to move on and a new stadium on the horizon for 2009, the times may be a'changing in the Bronx.

The Rockies may not have the household names that Boston have, but they have unquestionable team spirit
The 2007 All-Star game saw the American League's seeming dominance extend to a 10th consecutive victory as they won 5-4. However, with the NL trailing by one run and the bases loaded, St Louis manager Tony La Russa's decision not to pinch-hit with Cardinals star batter Albert Pujols (his last remaining bench player) seems as mystifying now as it was then.

Colorado may particularly have reason to question that decision, as the AL's victory means that games 1, 2, 6 and 7 of the seven-game World Series will be played in Boston, with games 3-5 in Denver. However, the Rockies will surely not be overawed, as they will enter the series having won 21 of their last 22 games.

Whether home field advantage plays a part or not, Boston will undoubtedly enter as the bookies' favourites.

They have an enviable pitching rotation containing the diverse talents of 20-win ace Josh Beckett, wily veteran Curt Schilling, Japanese star Daisuke ("Dice-K") Matsuzaka and knuckleballer Tim Wakefield, backed up by closer Jonathan Papelbon. And while the experts that would have you believe that it's pitching that wins games, there is scarcely a weak spot in their batting line-up with burly slugger David "Big Papi" Ortiz backed up by a strong supporting cast including Manny Ramirez, Mike Lowell and rookie Dustin Pedroia. They are also well-marshalled by manager Terry Francona.

But have Colorado read that script? They have exceeded everyone's expectations in the last month, and won an Interleague series at Fenway earlier in the season. Traditionally, visiting pitchers have not always been comfortable at Coors Field, because of its altitude (a mile above sea level) and dimensions - while under NL rules, the Boston pitchers will also have to bat in the games played there.

The Rockies may not have the household names that Boston have, but they have unquestionable team spirit - and the stats show that this season, they have been the best fielding team in MLB history. Left fielder Matt Holliday led the NL in batting average (.340) and runs batted in (137), while also blasting 36 home runs. Their pitching star is leftie Jeff Francis, while in spring-heeled centre fielder Willy Taveras, they have one of the quickest players in baseball - which should be as useful at Fenway as it is in the wide open spaces of Coors Field.

So, who do you think will triumph this October? Can the rookie Rockies end the dreams of Red Sox Nation? Who will be the stand-out players - and what are your highs and lows from the 2007 season?

Let us know what you think.

Latest 10 comments

Read members' comments or add your own

posted Oct 29, 2007

Ok thanks for that. I am enlightened! By the amount of interest in this it seems like an lot of people's questions have been answered...Didn't Cuba used to particpiate in thsi pre Castro era?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Oct 29, 2007

ok, so Red Sox rule the roost - can't wait for the Back Bay party tomorrow. And Please, Please, Please Mr Ford resign Mike Lowell....

As for A-Rod, what a class-less announcement that he was opting out of his contract - he & his agent really are scumbags - don't even think about ruining the Red Sox A-Rod, we need people who can compete in the post-season too....

Let's Go Red Sox!!!

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Oct 29, 2007

The Superbowl does not have the long history of the World Series, having only begun in the sixties, so I'm sure the first winners were deemed "The World Champions" so to echo Baseball's heritage.

Incidentally, when football started to gather momentum as a pastime in the UK, some of the leading teams did something akin to "World Series" naming. Twelve teams from the North and Midlands got together and gloriously named themselves "The Football League", even though teams from the South weren't invited! Leading clubs who were left out formed "The Southern League" and "The Football Alliance" but eventually merged with The Football League.

Continuing with a theme, why is it officially "The Football Association" ? Shouldn't it be "The Football Association of England and Wales (except Berwick)" ? Damn, arrogant Brits!

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Oct 29, 2007

Well, I think any team that plays in Major League Baseball would have to be based in North America. Otherwise the amount of travel involved to play games would not be feasible. Look at what happened this past weekend when the NFL (National Football League, i.e. American football) played a game in London. Travel in this league is not a very big issue b/c teams only play 1 game per week, and in this case travel time from the East Coast (where both of the game participants, Miami and New York, are based) to London is not that much farther than travelling to a game in California. But the league was so worried about the effects of the long trip on players that it gave both teams a bye week next week! This would never fly in baseball, when teams play games every day, with usually just one day off (or sometimes none) per week. In the past when regular season games have been played outside the US (Japan, Mexico), they are played in the very beginning of the season so it doesn't disrupt the rest of the schedule.

While I think the label of "World Champions" is a bit presumptious in that other countries besides the US play baseball. Same goes for the US basketball league the NBA, which also throws around the "world champs" title despite the fact that clearly the US is not the #1 basketball country in the world, and I say that as an American. But the title is appropriate in the fact that Major League Baseball does feature the best baseball PLAYERS from throughout the world (ditto for the NBA). Look at the newly crowned champion (and my hometown team!) Boston Red Sox: 2 of its star pitchers are from Japan, several players are from the Dominican Republic and elsewhere in Latin America, and one player is of Greek decent. Although it may not have started out this way, I think it is in this regard the phrase "World champs" is used.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Oct 29, 2007

I've enjoyed reading this. Good debate!

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Oct 29, 2007

JackRubys,
Nice Star Trek reference! However, I have to imagine that the London Kings admission to Major League Baseball was (will be?) greatly facilitated by the fact that they could use transporter technology to travel to any location on the planet instantly. Believe me, if they had to fly to all their games in current era planes, there's no way they could join the league!

And I agree with lurch, the Red Sox don't need A-Rod. More trouble than he's worth, and we just showed we can win the World Series w/o him!

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Oct 29, 2007

the world series....
1) there is a team from another country...Toronto, yes..i know, its on the border with the USA; but it still counts as a different country.
2) all of the WORLDS best players go to play in the major leagues, therefore it is a series between teams compiled of international players...
3) there is not one other league for baseball in the world that is even close to MLB in terms of quality of play or popularity.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Oct 29, 2007

Red Sox is Pants! innit?

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by niched (U10208459)

posted Oct 29, 2007

The Baseball World Cup is the international baseball competition (which began only last year) featuring the best players in the world playing for their respective countries. Japan won it last year, beating Cuba. It is structured like the football (soccer) World Cup. I was at the game where the U.S. lost to Mexico sadface. If you want to see Mexicans party, watch them beat the U.S. at baseball (or just about anything).

The term "World Series" is a century old and came about when really only Americans played baseball and before the U.S. was even close to being a world power. Of course, people from other countries (especially Britain) make fun of the term "World Series" -- rightly so in my opinion. I think it was John Cleese who said that whenever Britain decides to have a "World Series" of some kind, they do so by inviting other countries.

The nickname for the World Series is the "Fall Classic." I think Major League Baseball should get rid of the term "World Series" and just call it the "Fall Classic." But traditions die hard, and baseball is one of the biggest American traditions (though not quite as big as it used to be since American football is now more popular).

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Oct 30, 2007

When the Dodgers and Giants moved from NY to California in 1958 neither could have done it alone. Until then the western-most teams were the Kansas City Athletics and the St. Louis Cardinals. Even with transcontinental flight coming into its own, no team was willing to fly out to California to play three games in as many days against just one team, then fly back. But with two major league teams in California making it a week’s trip, it was feasible.

The point is, in the extremely unlikely chance that Major League Baseball was to find a toehold in Europe it would still need two teams in one league to work, and those within a day’s driving distance.

add comment | complain about this comment

Comment on this article

Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.

RATE THIS ARTICLE

Rate Breakdown

  • 5 85.71%
    6 votes
  • 4
    0 votes
  • 3
    0 votes
  • 2
    0 votes
  • 1 14.29%
    1 votes

average rating:
4.43 from 7 votes