Wayne Barnes - The real culpritRugby world cup New Zealand by gchewie (U2610033) 08 October 2007 I have been laughing my backside off all morning as I read how Wayne Barnes was the cause of the All Black defeat. Forward pass, yellow card etc. etc. etc. I thought the Aussies were teh Whinge Kings, but my God NZ are catching up fast! Latest 10 commentsRead members' comments or add your own
comment by
niall_g (U2157220) posted Oct 10, 2007 Totally agree. The SH refs are a joke. Walsh who has a semi has twice been suspended for incidents with coaching staff. If the culprit had been the coaches they would still be banned now. It has been going on for years - before the SH would accept neutral refs on a Lions Tour in one of the tests the SA ref said "Penalty to us!" (Think it was Campbell-Lammerton's tour). Mind you they are still better than SH RL refs! posted Oct 10, 2007 maybe fixing the draw so that the all blacks always get at least two minnows to score 100 points on every four years doesn't work in their favour?
comment by
ManofMunster (U3030595) posted Oct 10, 2007 Wayne Barnes is not a good ref. He was whistling all the innocuous marginal stuff and then missed a very forward pass (which ultimately decided the game) as well as sin-binning mcallister for a very borderline indiscretion.
comment by
RUblindref (U9861606) posted Oct 10, 2007 Manofmunster - get real you idiot!!! He is one of the better refs. New blood - if you're a Kiwi - deal with it move on - incidentally i am Bok fan so couldn't care who won. The AB's were 1 dimensional and got found out!! Allez le bleu!!
comment by
deanofatboy (U9659048) posted Oct 11, 2007 Fact...he did make a mistake..want the footage.
comment by
BadgesRUs (U9776196) posted Oct 11, 2007 What's the difference between a jet engine and an All Blacks fan *?
comment by
wainui01 (U3431046) posted Oct 15, 2007 Very good point ManofMunster - Barnes never really had control of the game and his decision making was poor, regardless as to who benefited at the time. Why isn't it possible to contend that the AB's choked AND Barnes had a bad game? I think they both had bad games.
comment by
barnaby_todger (U752811) posted Oct 15, 2007 "Barnes is from the Forest of Dean and he has reffed games between teams that make the ABs look a bit tame really.
comment by
platinumAussiePride (U14168845) posted Oct 10, 2009 listen mate, you are coming across slightly arrogant. Looking at it from all angles, New Zealand were undercooked and played poorly, but Wayne Barnes DID have a stinker and yes it could be argued that he cost them a game they didn't deserve to win, nontheless a game they could've won so i think the kiwi's have a right to get upset. To the kiwi's, it's sport you win some you lose some the majority of kiwi rugby fans i know and speak to were good sports about the loss despite being ntremendously pissed off that NZ burned (i mean, rugby is their bread and butter, they're lost without it) though personally I think even with the ridiculous yellow card and the forward pass aside, the French got away with murder at the breakdown and to an extent New Zealand did too. I wish Australia had a rubbish referee we could've blamed our loss on but hey, we got you back the next year at Tickers :P
comment by
Player1.1 (New Sarcasm beta) (U8500409) Comment on this article
Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.
|