BBC Home

Explore the BBC

New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in
Browse: Athletics

24 comments

user rating: 5 star

Paula's marathon return

comment on the article

Paula Radcliffe says she will race in November's New York marathon, her first in two years.

She only returned to action last Sunday at the Great North Run, where she was beaten, but it was her first race in 21 months following the birth of her daughter and a back injury.

The field in New York contains some stiff competition and it will be a tough task for the 33-year-old to repeat her 2004 triumph.

But that year she came back from the devastating drop out in the Olympic marathon and 10,000m which looked like it could wreck her confidence and even her career.

The world record holder doesn't do things easy, but how do you think she will get on?




Latest 10 comments

Read members' comments or add your own
comment by rocco75 (U3241566)

posted Oct 4, 2007

when i said that paula looked good for 2hr25 i wasnt intending to run her down, i think given how much time she has been out for that it would represent a good result. i think its unrealistic to expect her to instantly return to being the athlete that she was at her peak. but if she can run 2hr25 first time out that could put her on the road 2hr20 which is the sort of shape she'll need to be in to medal at the olympics.
imho

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Oct 4, 2007

The olympic A standard is 2.37.00 and we have 4 ladies that have passed that standard this year, Mara Yamauchi 2.25.41, hayley Haining 2.30.43, Liz Yelling 2.30.44, and tracey Morris 2.36.40. The B standard is 2.42 and we have Alice Braham at 2.41.08. Now Paula could and should quite easily pass the A standard so this could mean we have a team of 4 for the olympics and the team championship to.
Don't think money is Paulas motivation at this time as she receives top funding anyway, the determination she has shown nakes me think shes doing this marathon to prove she is the best in the world. Thankfully she's back.

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by U3564030
comment by lsabre (U1743466)

posted Oct 8, 2007

Let 's hope that conditions are at least better than Chicago yesterday, heatwaves seem to be hitting marathons again this season!

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Oct 9, 2007

I think the UK standard is 2:31 not 2:37. Also don't think we can take 4 to the Olympics; there isn't a team competition.

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by Scottrf (U9767632)

posted Oct 9, 2007

The A qualifying for the olympics is 2:37 for women and you can take your top three athletes if they pass under this standard in a qualifying event.

http://www.iaaf.org/statistics/standards/xml=beijing_2008/index.html

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Oct 10, 2007

To clarify. Yes, 2:37 is the Olympics 'A' standard but UK Athletics has chosen the tougher mark of 2:31.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Oct 11, 2007

Paula is a genuine athlete and works hard for and deserves all her success. She personifies everything that is good about running.
Good Luck Paula star

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Nov 3, 2007

Paula Radcliffe, despite her ability, is a nauseating, spoilt, over-indulged, over-paid, narcissitic, infantile BORE. Ask anyone who's ever worked or trained with her.

My hope is that she'll be thrashed tomorrow, retire and disappear.

add comment | complain about this comment

Comment on this article

Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.

RATE THIS ARTICLE

Rate Breakdown

  • 5 100.00%
    4 votes
  • 4
    0 votes
  • 3
    0 votes
  • 2
    0 votes
  • 1
    0 votes

average rating:
5.00 from 4 votes