Browse: Cricket World Twenty20 final ratingsby Paul G - BBC Sport (U1723268) 24 September 2007 ![]() Wow, what a match! Well done to India and bad luck Pakistan, but to use a tired old cliche, cricket was the real winner. Latest 10 commentsRead members' comments or add your own
comment by
amarjitmadan (U7159167) posted Sep 24, 2007 Gambhir at least 9 and very clever cricket did not let situation pressure Yuvraj
comment by
Salcido86 (U9553748) posted Sep 24, 2007 what more can Ghambir do?! surely a ten needed there. Agree with 3 being WAY too harsh for yuvraj, what on earth are you thinking?! He's not there to play an innings, he's there to hit big or get out and thats what he did. A three is deserving of someone who wasted a lot of balls without scoring or getting out. Yuvraj played for the team. How is Yuvraj's performance in this final equivalent to Afridis? I'm english but thats just madness
comment by
IMHO (U1647848) posted Sep 25, 2007 Paul G - That was plain rubbish. Wash your face and have another go.
comment by
CavYorkshire (U8186533) posted Sep 25, 2007 Erm, i think you watched a different game to me. In the final i watched Afridi bowled a really good spell, but in the one you watched he seems to have played as a batsman only. Yusuf Pathan scored some important quick runs and bowled a good over, which you seem to have not noticed. Also Uttapa and Yuvraj were good in the field so deserve more. Dhoni captained well and kept well, and harbajan joginder and sreesanth also deserve a few more. Very harsh on arafat, "Brought into the side to strengthen Pakistan's attack, he was only entrusted with two overs." firstly he isn't captain so shouldn't be blamed for only bowling 2 overs, and i think you'll find he was brough into the side purely to bowl at the death, with Gul Asif Hafeez, Afridi, Tanvir all in the side aswell how could they all have had 4 overs? very harsh on all players really, i think my cat could've written a more acurate player rationg article.
comment by
kabirsheikh (U7159806) posted Sep 25, 2007 Reads like ratings by someone who watched the scoreboard not the game...
comment by
nikred (U9735182) posted Sep 25, 2007 uthappa:6 well you mentioned the catch he took but completely missed the brilliant run out he executed. He got rid of the dangerman Imran Nazir who was looking to take the game away.
comment by
seeYouIndia (U2320326) posted Sep 25, 2007 it seems that only England players get a better rating from the BBC even after a poor performance, and even there, someone like Kevin Pietersen, who happens to be the top scorer for England gets a 5, and someone like Prior gets 6 or 7.
comment by
coomar (U9733691) posted Sep 25, 2007 comment by PunjabiMunda
comment by
ja7002 (U9754594) posted Sep 25, 2007 Rubbish ratings..
comment by
SGardazi (U9761382) posted Sep 25, 2007 Not too Bad, Except Misbah is not rated well, His rating should be highest, that means 10. Comment on this article
Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.
|