Browse: Cycling Part 5 - Stage 9, Galibierby opplock (U8996464) 16 July 2007 Then, Valloire again – a quick stop to buy something to eat, then one more damn bit of climbing back to the Col du Télégraphe, but it’s not too bad. Then the last descent of the day, back into St Michel. It takes no time, but your hands are starting to get sore from all that heavy braking. Finally, you’re back in St Michel after having conquered the Galibier, and you’re very deserving of a croque-monsieur. Latest 10 commentsRead members' comments or add your own
comment by
reallywheelie (U8190426) posted Jul 17, 2007 After Stage 9 [8](7):
comment by
smarauder68 (U3346753) posted Jul 17, 2007 Only 3 men can realistically win the tour at this point:
comment by
reallywheelie (U8190426) posted Jul 17, 2007 Lowlandbrit, I'm afraid because the T-mobile rider, Patrik Sinkewitz, had his accident after Stage 8 he was classified as an non-starter, rather than a withdrawal. So Stage 9 did have a victim. Now 171.
comment by
Groenhoven (U8255153) posted Jul 17, 2007 What a stage, what a tour!
comment by
conradin (U8881608) posted Jul 17, 2007 Astana probably needs to think about who should be their leader after Saturday...
comment by
prispen (U9037198) posted Jul 18, 2007 Why does no one mention Leipheimer as a potential winner of 'le Tour'? Surely as he has the track record and experience of working with Armstrong. His tactics will become clearer the further he progresses into the mountains. He is only 3.5mins down?
comment by
marktennis (U7057584) posted Jul 18, 2007 SMarauder...
comment by
Lowlandbrit (U5083598) posted Jul 18, 2007 Because Leipheimer isn't capable of putting time on anyone, he's a top 10 cyclist but no more.
comment by
DeGuzman (U6887287) posted Jul 18, 2007 Yep, Leipheimer will not win it, Contador is Discovery's man to watch.
comment by
MMsRedArmy (U6601402) posted Jul 18, 2007 the mountain stages showed that Leiphiemer will not get any higher than around 5. Never attacked, always following, and even then was getting dropped. Comment on this article |