posted Jul 9, 2007

Cocteau, we shall drink to that.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 9, 2007

"Cocteau, we shall drink to that."

So you're now toasting yourself, with one glass in each hand?

Call the men in white coats, we've got a schitzo!

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 9, 2007

yeah, a bit of perfection always comes in handy. It's not much to expect is it

Except for Federer that is

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 9, 2007

I'm just trying to work out how you can have "some perfection" Something is either perfect or it isn't - just like you can't be "slightly dead" or "a little bit pregnant"

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 9, 2007

COCTEAU TWIN

You claim that Federer has won his last Slam.

Who will defeat Federer the 04,05,06 US champ in September?

Personally think that Nadal may experience a drop in form like last year given his recent gruelling schedule.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 9, 2007

There is nothing wrong with hoping Randall, lets hope the players in the ATP can find their balls.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 9, 2007

Answering my own question after a little thought, feel Djokovic could be Federer's biggest threat in New York.

With a little help from the schedule of course.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 9, 2007

Just give it to him now, there's nobody will stop him at the USO or AO. Only on clay or the pseudo-grass (compacted clay really) of Wimbledon is there any question.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 10, 2007

Every Time before Federer plays,
they say the Transitional no.1 is a choker, who will get a breadstick and bagel from a qualifier, but yet the Transitional No.1 wins despite not playing at his best, and the guy the Trolls call No.1 chokes when it really matters.. because it was then we all saw.. Federer at the best.

These trolls only need a way to criticise Federer. Only a champion can serve the way Federer served to save the match. Only a Champion can win a break when it really mattered. By no means I degrade Nadal as he played like a champion to win the French, and came very close to win the Wimbledon.
But the fact remains that as it stands now, Federer is the best.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jul 10, 2007

This is a horribly written article... "They said no man could have one ridiculously large bicep." It's a cross between the chippily defensive and the genuinely deranged.

add comment | complain about this comment