BBC Home

Explore the BBC

New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in

158 comments

user rating: 4 star

Who to replace Vaughan?

One-day internationals England
comment on the article

On Friday, the selectors will give their response to England's dismal performance at the World Cup when they name a squad for the Twenty20 internationals and 50-over one-dayers against West Indies.

The input of new coach Peter Moores is likely to lead to up a shake-up of personnel, but the most significant decision they now have to make is to choose a successor to captain Michael Vaughan.

Andrew Flintoff might have been a candidate, despite being stripped of the vice-captaincy for off-field and on-pedalo misdemeanours in the Caribbean, had he not recently undergone surgery on his ankle.

So how do the others with the strongest claims to succeed Vaughan measure up?

BBC Sport website Cricket editor Paul Grunill gives his views:

ANDREW STRAUSS (78 ODI caps)

Pros: The safe choice. He has done the job before in 13 of his 78 one-day internationals – although England won only four of those matches – and is young enough at 30 to see the job through to the 2011 World Cup. Also has the experience to ensure the split captaincy situation does not cause friction with Vaughan.

Cons: Was dropped from the team during the World Cup in the Caribbean and a single half century in his last 14 innings is not good enough for a batsman of his talent.

Thoughts on captaincy: "Captaining any side is a tough job, which is why not everyone wants to do it and captaining England is an even tougher job. But it's a great challenge and, if things do go well, there is a massive upside to it as well.


PAUL COLLINGWOOD (121 ODI caps)

Pros: Collingwood has been a match-winner with both bat and ball in one-day cricket and is the best fielder in the team, producing brilliant catches and saves at backward point. Ultra-professional, he would lead by example and expect others to live up to the standards he sets.

Cons: Has only limited captaincy experience with Durham to draw on.

Thoughts on captaincy: “It's a stressful job, not an easy job, but if I was offered it I'd be very happy to take it".


KEVIN PIETERSEN (51 ODI caps)

Pros: Unquestionably one of the best batsmen in the world in either form of the game and capable of taking apart any attack in the world when in the mood. Certainly does not lack the self-confidence needed to lead an international side.

Cons: Even less captaincy experience than Collingwood. And do England really want to run the risk of his run-scoring being compromised by the demands of the job, as has happened to other brilliant players in the past?

Thoughts on captaincy: “"It's definitely something that you think about. In the future, it would be magnificent to captain my country.”


ALASTAIR COOK (2 ODI caps)

Pros: A former England under-19 skipper, Cook also led the MCC against Sussex at the start of the summer and has an old head on young shoulders. Benefitted from the advice from two former England captains, Graham Gooch and Keith Fletcher, during his formative years with Essex and has taken to Test cricket superbly with six centuries in 18 games.

Cons: Just 22 years old, he was not part of England’s World Cup squad. Likes to play within himself and has yet to prove he has the range or weight of strokes needed to thrive in the shorter form of the game, although his one-day record at county level is good.

Thoughts on captaincy: Has not offered a public view on the matter.

There seems to be a groundswell of opinion that Collingwood's hour has come - but who would you pick?

Latest 10 comments

Read members' comments or add your own

posted Jun 21, 2007

England ODI XI
TRESCOTHICK/LOYE
COOK
BOPARA
PIETERSEN
COLLINGWOOD(C)
SOLANKI
FLINTOFF
PRIOR
BROAD
PANESAR
ANDERSON

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jun 21, 2007

I would definately go for colly as captain. Trescothick should come back for the ODI's but if not then Loye should be given another chance. Benning isn't in the best of form at the moment so I think it would be unfair to bring him in at this point, but definately one for the future. I feel solanki should get a decent run in the side in a stable batting line up, he undoubtedly has the talent he just needs the means and the confidence to excell. As for the bowling Anderson, Flintoff and Panesar give you a solid base to work off and Broad should be given his chance. Collingwood, Bopara and Pietersen can fill in the other overs.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jun 21, 2007

It's got to be Collingwood. With so many players in the team still fighting for a place i.e Strauss/Flintoff and other too young or inexperianced, Collingwood is the only player who has played enough odi to be given a chance. He's also a proven match winner and seems to be liked in the team.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jun 21, 2007

KP as captain? No way. He'd get to bowl even more than now. How come KP (57 first class wickets at 50.22, 1 wicket in ODIs at 93.00) bowls when Ian Bell (47 first class wickets at 31.70, 6 wickets in ODIs at 14.66) never does these days? Hopefully when Collingwood is captain (with 121 ODI caps he's the only choice) he'll stand up to KP a bit better than Vaughan.

And why does everyone keep saying Bell's not a good ODI batter? He averagess 35.46 (at a rate of 68.53), second only to Pietersen and Trescothick, and just as good as Collingwood's 34.89 at 73.80. He's just as good a fielder too, and much better than Ashes 8-drop (that's got to be about 300 runs he gave away) Pietersen.

And how can Hoggard, world top 10 test match bowler for over a year, with an uncanny knack of getting wickets in his first over and being ultra-miserly with runs, not in the team?

Aaaaand why is Flinthoff, with one 50 in his last 28 ODI innings, still batting higher up the order than the likes of Bopara and Nixon/Prior? He's a great bowler and slip fielder. Isn't that enough?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jun 21, 2007

hoggard has had numerous chances in the one day arena and for some reason it has just not worked for him. so he won't be in the squad.

and i am another bell supporter - he's been one of the most consistent in the whole side!! dropping him for the last match in the world cup could have been seriously costly, yes i know the game wasn't crucial, and yes we did win but my point is that bell's replacement did practically nothing - and bell would have played the kind of innings to play himself through til the end! he has plenty of 100s in him, he just needs the chance!!

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jun 21, 2007

Hoggard: 26 matches, average 36.00, economy 5.29.

Panesar: 17 matches, average 39.00, economy 4.52.

Dalrymple: 27 matches, average 47.57 at economy 4.76.

Mahmood: 25 matches, average 38.90, economy 5.86.

Plunkett: 23 matches, average 36.34, economy 5.96.

I don't think Hoggy's done all that badly. Okay, the batting might be a bit weaker than some of those others, but we've got plenty of all rounders already. How many half-baked batter-bowlers do you need? He's class. The best bowler England's got. Time for another chance, surely?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jun 21, 2007

Incidentally, of Ian Bell's ODIs, look at who he's been playing against:
Australia 8 matches
Bangladesh 1
Canada 1
India 3
Ireland 2
Kenya 1
New Zealand 5
Pakistan 7
South Africa 5
Sri Lanka 6
West Indies 1
Zimbabwe 4

The majority have been against the current top five ODI teams: Australia, S Africa, New Zealand, Pakistan, Sri Lanka. Puts his record in perspective.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jun 22, 2007

My XI for odi's would be

Trescothick
Maddy
Bopara
Pietersen
Collingwood
Flintoff Capt
Loudon
Prior w/k
Anderson
Lewis
Panesar
cool

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jun 22, 2007

What kind of organisation is it where one of the most senior members of the management team resigns a position of responsibilty without there being a successor ready to take his place? Media debates about who should captain Engalnd's one day team indicate that the leaders of English cricket couldn't organise a party in a brewery.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jun 22, 2007

you know nothing wimereux you numpty

add comment | complain about this comment

Comment on this article


RATE THIS ARTICLE

Rate Breakdown

  • 5 55.56%
    20 votes
  • 4 16.67%
    6 votes
  • 3 5.56%
    2 votes
  • 2
    0 votes
  • 1 22.22%
    8 votes

average rating:
3.83 from 36 votes