Hoggard returns for fourth TestTest cricket England by 606 Sport Hosts (U3702819) 11 June 2007 ![]() England have called up Matthew Hoggard to replace out-of-sorts Durham seamer Liam Plunkett in their 12-man squad for the fourth Test against West Indies. Latest 10 commentsRead members' comments or add your own
comment by
U3238270 posted Jun 11, 2007 The dropping of Plunkett to make way for Hoggard was a "no-brainer".
comment by
KipperJohn (U2561200) posted Jun 11, 2007 Yes Bell has scored most of his centuries at No. 6 I believe. But he is a far better bat than Collingwood technically - a class above probably - and in the longer term, he should score more runs. However Collingwood is good at marshalling the tail and improvising his game as he has shown repeatedly in the one day game. He also rides his luck better than Bell!! But - eventually -Bell should make the No.3 spot his own - hopefully a bit like Ponting. For the avoidance of any doubt I am not a Warwickshire supporter!
comment by
bhamgills (U2218150) posted Jun 11, 2007 I think the feeling with keeping Strauss at least for the next test is that he has proven he can play at the top level, whereas Plunkett has only ever shown glimpses and nothing on a consistent basis.
comment by
sm1thers (U8247542) posted Jun 11, 2007 I fully accept that hoggard was going to replace plunkett in the team, but in the squad?
comment by
Audierne (U7854128) posted Jun 11, 2007 Mahmood? I understand that he has just had an operation so is unlikely to be available anyway.
comment by
joecolewalksonwater (U3017492) posted Jun 11, 2007 Looking at the squad it seems that James Andersen will sit out - but why pick Strauss again? We all know he's a quality player but out of form. Why make him struggle through another test when he could be rebuilding his confidence at county level?
comment by
AlexCricket (U8433240) posted Jun 12, 2007 I have just read Boyks comments with interest. Yes, I think that Strauss should have been dropped particularly considering it is not the best bowling attack in the world that keeps getting him out cheaply. It is all very well hoping he will come good in the next test but if he does n't then we may have to go into the opening test with India with an untested line up. I would be interested to see 1) who would come in and 2) where they would come in. I think that with the bowling that we've got and the fact that Hoggard has only recently returned from injury I would be tempted to promote Bell to 3 and have Bopara at 6.
comment by
AlexCricket (U8433240) posted Jun 12, 2007 Oh and one thing I forgot - don't critisise Bell as a ODI player he was one of the most consistent in the CB series and I see him as being able to fufil the Hussey role for England in an ODI
comment by
Foxy4england (U8397665) posted Jun 12, 2007 where do you look if you need a world class player|??yyyorkshire!! thats a goood side that if hoggard was fully fit and flintoff instead of anderson. its fairly balanced with a good set of batsmen and a good selection of bowling. right arm fast, right arm away swing, left arm fast medium and left arm spin. almost perfect right?
comment by
kingnigglethepurple (U8609383) posted Jun 12, 2007 i think plunkett hasnt played that bad but hoggard needs to be in squad because he is class i think that strauss does deserve another chance but if he fails to get a decent score then he should be dropped like a bad habit we need a solid partner for cook Comment on this articleMY RELATED LINKSThe BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites |