Is this the poor man's Eriksson?International football by Phil McNulty - BBC Sport (U1816352) 24 March 2007 ![]() Steve McClaren's rapid-fire soundbites failed to disguise the latest damning evidence that England may just have appointed a poor man's Sven-Goran Eriksson to direct their Euro 2008 fortunes. Latest 10 commentsRead members' comments or add your own
comment by
MUFC South London Reds (U1902659) posted Mar 27, 2007 A second rate team with third rate brain power.That best describes England and McClaren.
comment by
arwsto (U2047939) posted Mar 28, 2007 Italy won the world cup by playing as a team.
comment by
sanioo (U7927847) posted Mar 28, 2007 nah nah, all u lot are having a go at steve McClaren but he is only doing his job! we r meant 2 b one of the best teams in the world so we need a gud managere agread? well why cnt the FA afford 1 then, they refused 2 pay a GUD manger what he wanted so we had 2 settle for McClaren, he isnt doin the best of jobs but the FA wont get anyone that wants a bit more money! we also need a manager who has balls, being able 2 drop thier big name players like LAMPARD!! he needs 2 b dropped in the midfield and play hargreaves and gerrard in the middle! we r all blaming McClaren but what about the FA who got him because thats all they were willing to pay!! if anything they are to balme, were a world class team we need a GUD manager, and he might cost a bit but he will get us results!!
comment by
keiron5756 (U1754083) posted Mar 28, 2007 you think we are good??
comment by
VidicLek (U6998029) posted Mar 28, 2007 he hasnt done anything wrong apart from not win...but yet he hasnt done anything right either, so i thikn he should have til the end of the campaign and then get coleman!!
comment by
DCFC-Centrum (U7929358) posted Mar 28, 2007 After 40+ years of watching fooball and cricket at all levels from pub side to England it has become incresingly obvious that whilst other nations have improved we have been stagnatory. Cricket learned early on that if you allow a host of foreign players to appear in your best teams then the international side will underperform because our youngsters do not get the opportunity to progress.Many of our smaller "league" teams include playrs from many different nations and this cannot be to the benefit of the national side.At least at cricket we can compete at the highest international level even if we do not achieve the results which we would like on occasion.this multi nation argument is only 1 aspect of the malaise which stains the England soccer performances and i would have to agree with others who argue that Stave mcLaren may not be getting the best team together rather than assembling the best players. It has been obvious for some time that we are either not playing Lampard/Gerrard in their correct positions or they cannot play together in the same team.unfortunately against a minnow like Andorra we are unlikely toobserve the difference even though Lampard is now out of the side. we all want england to do well and we all have our opinions on selections / managers but we all want the best for our team - it is just a pity the first opposition in every match is our own press!!
comment by
Michaelenglefield (U7900363) posted Mar 28, 2007 How about this:
comment by
shiftyid (U5387064) posted Mar 28, 2007 Michaelenglefield,
comment by
ScarlettATL (U5422984) posted Mar 28, 2007 Why did England get rid of Sven? He was no Ramsey but some of England's best years were under this manager. England went out in the Qtrs of the World Cup. How much more were English fans expecting from a good but second tier national team? The players are drowning in unrealistic expectations and look lost in their England colors. Give them some room (to fail and succeed) and they will at least play to their capability or better.
comment by
Don Caster (U2059163) posted Mar 29, 2007 Lets hope England don't get carried away just because they won three nil. Remember it was only Andorra, a fourth rate team who held third rate England for the whole of the first half. At least England played better(slightly) without that over-rated Lampard, but were still poor. Poor manager, no tactical skill, and no new ideas. Playing 4 4 2 is old hat, they have all worked us out. Comment on this articleMY RELATED LINKSThe BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites |