BBC Home

Explore the BBC

New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in

488 comments

user rating: 4 star

Is Neil Warnock out of order?

Premiership Sheffield United
comment on the article

"I don't really want to change too much, but squad rotation may come into it. I will have to be careful who I select against Arsenal and may even play a second XI."

So said Sheffield United boss Neil Warnock on 28 December, prior to his side's double header against the Gunners on 30 December and Middlesbrough two days later.

Strange then, that the man who fielded a reserve team as the Blades crashed out of the FA Cup 3-0 at home to League One side Swansea City now says he is against teams putting out anything less than their strongest XI.

At Boro on Saturday, boss Gareth Southgate decided to rest Jonathan Woodgate and Mark Viduka, with an FA Cup quarter-final replay against Manchester United at Old Trafford looming two days later.

His side went on to lose 2-0 to Manchester City, a result that moved Stuart Pearce's strugglers two points ahead of Sheffield United in the table and then moved Warnock to lash out at Southgate's decision.

"It's a disgrace and it is scandalous," fumed the sixth longest-serving manager in English football.

"I know Gareth's a friend of Stuart's, but I don't think a club like Boro should disrespect Sheffield United and it leaves a bitter taste in my mouth."

That bitter taste could just be sour grapes, though.

After all, Warnock had just watched his team capitulate at Chelsea and, coupled with Charlton's win over Newcastle, it meant the Blades were only four points above the dreaded drop zone.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, even Man Utd boss Sir Alex Ferguson had a pop: "It doesn’t worry me if they rest players. I have players who can handle playing on a Saturday and a Monday.

"The people who might be concerned are Charlton and West Ham. If Middlesbrough win, there is no problem. But if they lose, it is a different issue altogether."

Easy to say when you've got one of the biggest and best squads in the world and are managing an in-form team that has won 11 out of the last 13 games.

Middlesbrough they ain't.

So can anyone really blame Southgate for resting his best players prior to Monday's replay?

Boro are 12th in the league with almost no chance of getting into Europe next season and their entire campaign rested on 90 minutes against the best team in the country - a team gunning for a remarkable treble.

OK, so they lost. But they lost to a late penalty that could have gone either way and had Viduka and Stewart Downing scored with two fantastic chances, they could have caused an almighty upset to book a semi-final spot against Watford.

That's Watford, the Premiership's bottom team. For a chance to play in an FA Cup final at the new Wembley Stadium and – if Chelsea beat Blackburn in the other semi – a guaranteed place in the Uefa Cup next season.

As Boro's last Uefa Cup run earned Steve McClaren the England job, it's easy to forgive Southgate for making a decision he felt was the right one for his club.

Add to the equation the concern that Viduka very rarely gets through two full games in a week these days, not to mention Woodgate's horrific history of injury problems, and I believe Southgate was fully justified.

Not that he needs to justify himself to the media or Warnock - or anyone other than his chairman Steve Gibson and the Middlesbrough supporters.

At a time when football is dominated by financial reward and the pressure on Premiership managers reaches new heights, Southgate is just looking after number one.

Should he be bothered who gets relegated at the end of the season, as long as it's not Middlesbrough?

Latest 10 comments

Read members' comments or add your own

posted Mar 23, 2007

Arca was carrying an Injury, hence why he is now out for two weeks, Woodgate has announced that he too is carrying a knee injury and again he is missing this weekends England game, Viduka played the second half. What is the problem? Yes it was a very very poor performance but I think it was due to the thought of saving there energies for the Monday game. Warnock should keep his opinions to himself and worry about picking his own team as it seems he's not doing a very good job at that. Trying to pick two teams on a weekend must be taking it's toll on him

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Mar 23, 2007

I can't believe he had a rant about that but not the blind, stupid numpty linesman that gave West Ham's 2nd "goal"

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Mar 24, 2007

I can't believe Warnocks moaning about this- has he run out of other subjects to moan about? Man City are not the greatest of premiership teams, but it is an insult to even consider them getting relegated with the likes of Sheffield United. Warnock is alwayws moaning about something- can't he just grow up and admit that the better team won???

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Mar 24, 2007

BlueButNotDown is right.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Mar 26, 2007

The important thing that is mentioned above is the fact Warnock did exactly the same in the league cup game with Swansea. Hypocritical, wrong, typical Warnock, and if i was Southgate i would be furious with the comments.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Mar 26, 2007

Speng 316 i'm afraid you've missed the point. Warnocks team selection against Swansea affected only his own club (and supporters). If Middlesboro decided to 'have a day off' against Man City it could affect quite a few others in a much more significant way!

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Mar 26, 2007

indeed it could exiled blade...

however, unless the premiership rules compell a manager to play his "strongest" available 11 (an who would judge that..??) then he can pick and not pick who he likes..

the problem would arise if it were suspected (with evidence to back it up) that a manager had fielded an understrenght side to deliberately lose a game and "help" his "friends" at other clubs...

Now that would be a very serious allegation and would need proof to hold..

any other team selection for reasons wholly within the club itself, are irrelevant to this...

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Mar 30, 2007

At the end of the day, NW has the same right to comment on things as any of you have to comment on him...



add comment | complain about this comment

comment by friend (U2229587)

posted Mar 30, 2007

Typical Warnock..all mouth, no action, getting very hot under the collar, after all i feel strongly that hes taking us straight back down to our spiritual home now after one3 season up above.He knows hes due the sack, and so hes going to blame all he can to cover the lamentable state of talent in the squad..lack of talent that is..

add comment | complain about this comment

Comment on this article


RATE THIS ARTICLE

Rate Breakdown

  • 5 75.16%
    115 votes
  • 4 9.80%
    15 votes
  • 3 3.27%
    5 votes
  • 2 .65%
    1 votes
  • 1 11.11%
    17 votes

average rating:
4.37 from 153 votes