Robinson goal - indirect free kick?Premiership Tottenham Hotspur by neutralned (U6838676) 18 March 2007 Not that I didn't really enjoy the goal but Robinson scored from a free kick right? Which didn't touch anyone. However it was not a direct free kick which meant it should have been disallowed. What am I not seeing? Was there a law change or should it not have stood? Latest comments
Read members' comments or add your own
comment by
U7054648 posted Mar 18, 2007 Ye OMG did he try to score? and how did The GK not save it?
comment by
jervisd (U7097292) posted Mar 18, 2007 Why wasn't it a dircet free-kick? It was a foul therefor a direct free-kick was given. just cos it was a long way out doesn't make it indirect, its what type of infringement caused it
comment by
Sheva For Ever (U6515270) posted Mar 18, 2007 That rule only applies when in attacking half. posted Mar 18, 2007 That is a great point
comment by
iamaspursfan (U2885318) posted Mar 18, 2007 it was a direct free kick tho, as oen of teh watford players fouled our player.
comment by
Harvezspur88 (U6831704) posted Mar 18, 2007 I dont think it matters one bit ... West Hams goal yesterday was 100 times more contreversial than Robinsons so lets not get carried away.
comment by
Theonelikefranco (U1888917) posted Mar 18, 2007 Direct Free Kick
comment by
stuvon (U5867888) posted Mar 18, 2007 "Hope that will be an end to these pointless threads. I took me 5 seconds to find this info. DO IT YOURSELF NEXT TIME!!!!"
comment by
neutralned (U6838676) posted Mar 20, 2007 Thanks Stuvon, I thought that was one of the reasons for using these boards too - bit like yahoo answers... Comment on this article
Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.
|