BBC Home

Explore the BBC

Browse: Athletics

19 comments

user rating: 4 star

Why British athletics needs to get Carter

by Matt Slater (U1647490) 16 February 2007
comment on the article

When I mentioned yesterday to a colleague that I had just interviewed Xavier Carter, he said: “That’s great, what did he…actually, I’ve got to be honest, I don’t know who he is.”

After I’d told him who the “X-Man” is and why he is of interest, he said he was embarrassed and shook his head.

No need to be embarrassed colleague “x”, I didn’t really know who Carter was until about an hour before talking to him, and neither did most of the office.

And I wonder, whilst we’re being candid, how many of you (who don’t visit the athletics index very often) can say you know who Xavier Carter is? And I don’t mean who he is deep down when the crowds have gone home. I mean who he is at all.

Well, for those that don’t and haven’t already guessed, Carter is the next superstar sprinter to emerge lycra-clad, wearing sunglasses and bristling with muscles from the American track and field factory.

You probably missed it (he is pretty rapid) but last summer the Louisiana State University student became the first athlete to match Jesse Owens’ haul of four titles at the US college championships. He then turned pro, signed a contract with Nike, got a passport and travelled to Europe to race in the big-money meets.

In his second outing, at Lausanne, the then 20-year-old stopped the clock at 19.63 seconds for 200m. American experts knew all about Carter, now the international circuit did too.

The only sprinter to cover that distance faster is Michael Johnson. The incomparable Texan appeared to carve his name into the record books for decades when he clocked 19.32 seconds as a 28-year-old at the 1996 Olympics.

But here was a novice getting within a few yards of Johnson’s record despite admitting he had run a bad bend and still had lots to learn. And Carter has since suggested that he thinks a record-breaking 200m is possible this year.

Johnson, as most sports fans remember, also holds the world record for 400m. The versatile Carter has that in his sights too.

Oh, and as if the Carter v Johnson angle isn’t ringing your bell yet, Johnson is coaching Carter’s main rival at 400m, fellow American and reigning Olympic champion Jeremy Wariner.

When I asked Carter if he had met the legendary Johnson (legendary for the shirts he wears when commentating for the BBC, if nothing else), he said: “No.”

When I asked if he had any plans to get in contact with Johnson, he said: “No.”

Sensing my unease (at asking two yes/no questions in a row), he added: “I’m just doing my own thing.”

Fine, Xavier. No problem at all. Athletics, particularly sprinting, needs a bit of aggro to give it some edge.

Aggro but not needle. The sport has had rather too much of that recently, which is why Carter is probably not even a household name in his hometown of Melbourne, Florida. But more on that later.

Carter is in the UK this weekend. He is running the 400m in the Norwich Union Grand Prix at Birmingham’s National Indoor Arena. And he should win. He was, after all, the top-rated man indoors over the distance last season.

And if truth be told, athletics in this country could do with him winning and hopefully tempting a few picture editors with his crossed-forearms “X” victory salute. Because the reason so few of us here had heard of Carter, and I’m guessing so few of you too, is that British athletics has taken a few knocks of late.

A lack of success, a shortage of characters, Dwain Chambers, the drip-drip suggestion that the sport is wasting lottery money…pick your poison. Whichever you choose, the result is the same: apathy.

All sports in this country struggle to compete for the sunshine of public attention with the out-of-control leylandii that is Premiership football, but British athletics’ misfortune has been compounded by the fact other non-mainstream sports have provided the public with some much-needed cheer.

There is now a real chance that our athletes will be shown up at the 2008 Olympics in Beijing in the medal stakes by our boxers, cyclists, divers, rowers, sailors, swimmers and triathletes. This is a sorry state of affairs for a country that has grown used to winning at least half a dozen athletics medals, with a few golds.

OK, I know steps have been taken and there is a new team in place at UK Athletics, and I also know it’s all about 2012 now.

But athletics in this country could really use some solid results and some old-fashioned razzamataz. Ideally, English 60m prospect Craig Pickering can provide the former, while Carter gives us the latter.

Which brings me back to the X-Man’s own predicament. Athletics isn’t just struggling here. It has taken a pummelling back in the US too.

The sport has traditionally been even further down the pecking order in the US than it has here. Your average American sports fan only really cares about “track and field” when the Olympics come around, and then it is a simple case of “U, S, A!”

So what the sport has done in recent years is the equivalent of attempted suicide. Drug story after drug story has left a nation at first disgusted and then just bored.

All of which makes Carter’s decision to turn his back on American sport’s leylandii, the NFL, all the more surprising.

Please don’t confuse his two-sport prowess with the old story about Darren Campbell being on the books at Plymouth Argyle. Carter was the number one receiver coming out of high school in 2004. And he was recruited to play for one of the nation’s top gridiron colleges. At 6ft 3in, 15st and with a 10-second 100m, Carter was heading for the big time.

So why did he change tack and go for track? Who knows…maybe he didn’t fancy taking the hits anymore, not that I would suggest that to his face. He is massive.

Or perhaps he thinks he can win multiple golds in 2008 and 2012 and then return to gridiron at 26, thereby writing himself into US sports legend.

I’m going for the latter. American track and field needs somebody with that kind of ambition and talent right now.

British athletics will be hoping some of that “X-Man” magic rubs off on to a British competitor this weekend. Because magic is what it needs right now.

Latest 10 comments

Read members' comments or add your own

posted Feb 17, 2007

I follow athletics and I know who he is, but to be honest I'm not that bothered. I have no interest in the male sprints anymore, there's a hell of lot more to enjoy in the sport than yet another over hyped over pumped posturing American.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Feb 17, 2007

I have seen him run twice before and he does look impressive.

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by Nitebot (U1534244)

posted Feb 18, 2007

So long as Carter steers well clear of drugs he will end up a sporting phenomenon.

If you watch a video of that 19.63 run on YouTube and other places you will see how far down he was on the leader around the bend. He came back like a train. The 200m could be one of the great events this year.

The question is whether Carter can match Wariner. Wariner is a regular sub 44s 400m runner and Carter has yet to come close to that yet. He has to decide what he wants to do.

I didn't know he was such a good US footballer though. He has the potential to be one of the sporting greats.

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by rocco75 (U3241566)

posted Feb 19, 2007

i think this season will be a real test for the xman, after the initial splash he made last year when he ran 19.63 he was a little disappointing in his other races and didn't get close to that sort of form again; lost a couple to tyson gay at 200m and didn't look very good at 400m or 100m. there's a lot of competition around at the moment at the 200m, and personally i think he's a bit overhyped and that tyson gay and wallance spearmon will ahve the edge on him next season.

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by U4750185

posted Feb 19, 2007

I think it is fairly obvoius that Carter is on some sort of drugs, just like Gatlin.

He comes from nowhere and runs 19.6? come on

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by Nitebot (U1534244)

posted Feb 19, 2007

I think Carter can dominate both Gay and Spearmon this season in the 200m. He just needs to run his races right.

I thought it was funny at the weekend meet when the commentator implied that Carter probably had no idea who most of the people were he was running against. He doesn't bother checking out his rivals much.

He just seems to think there are people here I must beat and that's that!

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Feb 19, 2007

I think the idea of one fantastic race leading one to the opinion that someone is on peds is flawed. Drugs do not turn someone into a fantastic runner after one hit they make harder training possible if he had run many 19.6 times then i would have thought this man is on drugs.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Feb 19, 2007

Carter, Gay and Spearman all great athletes and all apeared from virtual obscurity. Have to agree with some of the drug related sentiment though. Remember carter played american football, hardly the cleanest sport. After Balco some American performances leave me doubting the reality. A lot of professional sportsmen and women were implicated. Look how everyone loved Marion Jones, controversy all her career, so many doubts, was any of it real. The yanks were always the first to point the finger at the old eastern block...... those in glass houses. The Jury is out on the americans including carter. Wish I wasnt so cynical, in 2004 gay ran 20.07, spearman 20.25 and carter 20.49, now all running 19.6 while the rest of the world stands still. The 2003 Junior lists show Carter on 20.69 one tenth ahead of the best GB junior, he wasnt even the fastest american. Are we getting it so wrong over here or are the yanks the only ones who can get it right !!!!

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by Nitebot (U1534244)

posted Feb 21, 2007

After the Balco and then Gatlin scandals we must be cautious but that doesn't mean we should automatically assume that anyone who has a great performance is a systematic abuser.

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by U4750185

posted Feb 21, 2007

Carter and Gay are cheats. simple as that.

add comment | complain about this comment

Comment on this article

Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.

RATE THIS ARTICLE

Rate Breakdown

  • 5 42.50%
    17 votes
  • 4 45.00%
    18 votes
  • 3 2.50%
    1 votes
  • 2 2.50%
    1 votes
  • 1 7.50%
    3 votes

average rating:
4.13 from 40 votes