Manchester City 0 - 3 Blackburn Roversby 606 Sport Hosts (U3702819) 20 January 2007
Morten Gamst Pedersen scored twice as Blackburn moved above Manchester City into 10th in the Premiership table. Latest 10 commentsRead members' comments or add your own
comment by
gibberingfool (U563401) posted Jan 20, 2007 In fact, in all my comments, the one thing I've not said is that I do wish Andre Ooijer a quick recovery.
comment by
ianash (U7196589) posted Jan 21, 2007 obvious handball poor decision by ref.panel should review refs performances in an higher profile game decision would have been different s pearce should question the ref ,like certain managers do
comment by
Bluebrock (U1693499) posted Jan 21, 2007 City were appalling in the first half. The worst display i have seen since the Wigan debacle. Maybe 3-0 flattered Blackburn but on that first half performance we still need to be grateful that Wigan are in freefall and that West Ham are still 10 points behind us.
comment by
mikfish (U7173591) posted Jan 21, 2007 I have to agree with Ianash I'm totally a rovers fan but it was a penalty and im a firm beliver that the refs and the officals are spoiling the game its time to bring in the telly all I will say is its about time we started getting the decisions. any game is a big game and could be the diferance in staying safe or being religated not enough is being done to punish the refs and officals.
comment by
gibberingfool (U563401) posted Jan 21, 2007 I must say I agree too.
comment by
scottycam (U578503) posted Jan 22, 2007 superadambrfc
comment by
gibberingfool (U563401) posted Jan 22, 2007 To be fair scottycam, with the serverity of the injury it would have been dangerous to take the corner while Ooijer was there.
comment by
scottycam (U578503) posted Jan 22, 2007 I agree, but there aren't rules for it I don't think. We are told that refs aren't supposed to think by themselves, but to adhere to the regulations as set out. However there are instances where the refs decidid that they will act on their own accord. I can appreciate it from an injury point of view. But why that specific injury and why not all injuries? Any time a player is off the pitch getting sorted there is always the possibiluity that the ball could strike them. Mind you after the Pen we didn't get (Again) I wouldn't expect the ref to do anything in our favour.
comment by
gibberingfool (U563401) posted Jan 22, 2007 I still think there's a difference between Ooijer's injury and most others. If the player hobbles off with most others play will continue. It's the fact that play was at that end and if the ball struck him from a shot or if the players ended up falling on him, it could effectively end his career.
comment by
mikfish (U7173591) posted Jan 22, 2007 I think you'll find it was because savage was jumping up and down on the touch line calling for assistance because he could see the injury and he told the ref. The reason that they are not ment to stop the game is because of these so called big teams whose players fall over scream blue murder and then return after 5 mins wasted play. but I think they are allowed to use thier own judgement and lets say thank god for that. Comment on this articleMY RELATED LINKSThe BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites |