Beckham loan?Manchester United by Desolation_row (U2325800) 13 January 2007 Okay I'm not a huge fan of beckham, his performances in the last season for us were poor, however capello has just said he will not play him again for the rest of the season, the guy would play for 50p a week considerin how much he would love to come back and how much he is going to get paid at LA. Would it be worth getting him in till the end of the season just as a bit of cover so we can rest the likes of gigs and ronaldo he could be a very useful last minute sub considering again how much he would give for united on the pitch and the ability to bring him on along side Ole and Larrson would be devastating on many of the smaller clubs at least. I wouldn't play him for whole matches but when you consider the form of giggs 33 and scholes 32 and consider Beckham is younger, I think it'd be worth a try. Latest 10 commentsRead members' comments or add your own
comment by
DwightRight4TopFlight (U5425681) posted Jan 14, 2007 isabre,ferguson did make one mistake ill grant you which he never dared to repeat again.In the european cup final in 99,he attempted to play beckham as a central midfielder,which almost cost him the trophy,however fate decreed that United would win that day,so it almost gets forgotten.There is no question fegie realised from this point,even in his prime(99),beckham was hopelessly out of his depth in the centre of midfield aginst top class players.Anyone who tried to do the same since has also been made to look silly and been forced to recognise the only place he could play was on the wing where his limitations could be covered up.Unfortunately with that clown eriksson in charge,he wa given,ludicrously,free reign with england and what we got from that utter folly was continued and repeated failure at the first point england came up against a country with a football-history(ie brazil,portugal)and with it,humiliating and premature exit.
comment by
lsabre (U1743466) posted Jan 15, 2007 I beg to differ on this one southcliffe. Beckham has played well as a central midfielder and was never out of his depth, but was usually called upon to play as such when there was no real back-up for him, or substituting for someone missing there, and without changing the shape of the team around him, thus midfield becoming sort of a mess.
comment by
DwightRight4TopFlight (U5425681) posted Jan 15, 2007 well the facts show otherwise.N-one who understood what beckham was and wasnt taken in by the false spin,considered him to have anywhere near enough all-round ability to be a central midfielder.To be a top class central midfielder,you have to have the skills of a zidane or a gerrard at worst.You have to(preferably)have the ability to kick with both feet(not with only one part of one foot),tackle well(cmon lol),posses acceptable heading ability,have leadership qualities(yea,right lol)not let your ego get the better of you(haha).Limited and one-dimensional players do not great central midfielders make as history has proven before and will again.
comment by
lsabre (U1743466) posted Jan 16, 2007 Well, there are no facts showing otherwise. He has all-round ability, he can play very well with his left as well (proof that, eg, the second and third England goals away at the 5-1 rout of Germany were delivered with his left), he has more than acceptable heading ability, he is a top class midfielder and second to none, he has leadership qualities as shown in so many games when he stood against opposition on his own - his performance, eg, against Greece at Old Trafford speaks volume for that! Except, of course, for those who are blind and biased and never got to see a single thing! Enough said!
comment by
DwightRight4TopFlight (U5425681) posted Jan 16, 2007 you clueless imbecile,i dont seroiusly even think you actually believe the garbage youve just wirtten.If you do then get out of my sport and go and follow a game more suited to your vacancy.Previuosly you made assertions which were worth responding to,this time im just not going to waste my time with sentences such as "he was a midfielder second to none".GET LOST YOU UTTER CLOWN.
comment by
lsabre (U1743466) posted Jan 17, 2007 Typical poor response by a typical poor soccer fan! Whose second name component (cliff) clearly reflects his scope of thought and capacity! Another one with non-existent arguments, who easily drops out at the first obstacle trying to make whatever impression by just insulting. Well, it 's not your sport mr southcliffe, you 're just a disgrace to the sport, that is what you are. Now, shove off!
comment by
DwightRight4TopFlight (U5425681) posted Jan 17, 2007 sorry isabre,nice knowing you but im off to talk with some grown ups now.
comment by
Stev (U1919611) posted Jun 11, 2007 you clueless imbecile,i dont seroiusly even think you actually believe the garbage youve just wirtten.If you do then get out of my sport and go and follow a game more suited to your vacancy.Previuosly you made assertions which were worth responding to,this time im just not going to waste my time with sentences such as "he was a midfielder second to none".GET LOST YOU UTTER CLOWN.
comment by
DwightRight4TopFlight (U5425681) posted Jun 11, 2007 im not sure what "level" someone raking up threads from 6 months ago brings it to thats for sure.What kind of person seeks out ancient threads just to make pious,irrlevant,im-so-superior comments,eh?
comment by
Finn723 (U6728793) posted Jun 12, 2007 isabre,ferguson did make one mistake ill grant you which he never dared to repeat again.In the european cup final in 99,he attempted to play beckham as a central midfielder,which almost cost him the trophy,however fate decreed that United would win that day,so it almost gets forgotten Comment on this article |