BBC Home

Explore the BBC

New visitors: Create your membership
Returning members: Sign in
Browse: Tennis

31 comments

user rating: 4 star

Andy Murray

by rossco190 (U3743822) 07 January 2007
comment on the article

Andy Murray's stunning uprise through the World Rankings hit a dead end on the 6th January where he lost out in the Qatar Open Final against Ivan Ljubicic (Croatian). Although he still tipped to become a world class player by the end of they year, yet the bookies are staying put on Andy Murray making a suprise win at Wimbledon. Andy Murray is expected to hit within the top 10 by the end of the Spring season to some people such as Ivan Ljubicic, whether that happens or not is still to be seen.

Andy Murray lost 4-6 4-6 to second seed Ivan Ljubicic in the Qatar Open final in Doha to end his hopes of starting 2007 with a second career ATP title.
The Scot had eight chances to break in the first set but it was the Croat who took advantage of a loss of focus by Murray to break in the 10th game.

Murray went a break up at 3-2 in the second but Ljubicic recovered and broke again to clinch a hard-fought victory.
Despite the loss, Murray goes to the Australian Open as a top 16 seed.

"Ivan is a great player and a great fighter and I lost to a better player today," the 19-year-old said.

"It was freezing cold out here throughout the week but we played some really good tennis. I am happy with the way I played for the most part and I look forward to continuing the good form in Australia."

"Murray is a tough opponent - I had to be aggressive but not too aggressive" said Ivan Ljubicic

Murray carved out six break points against a rusty Ljubicic in the very first game but the Croat hung on stubbornly to hold after nearly 15 minutes. There were more chances for Murray to break in the seventh game, as Ljubicic lost concentration with a series of rash strokes, only to see the world number five cling on again.

It was the British number one who finally unravelled in the 10th game as Ljubicic tested him with some fierce forehands and took the opener with a brilliant passing shot.

The players continued to trade powerful strokes as the quality of the match

Latest 10 comments

Read members' comments or add your own

posted Jan 8, 2007

The tournament he got to the final in was not really lavished with the current Top 20. Fortunately for the Scot it was only over 3 sets. I would like to see how he fairs in the Masters Tournaments and the GS's. He places too much an emphasis on his current age / physical shape when other players younger than him have already proved it can be done, Becker for instance and most notably of recent years Nadal.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 8, 2007

Of course he will make top 10. Up until wimbledon he will only have to defend the points for his win in san jose and 2 other quarter finals. Last season he just made the first or second round in every other tournament apart from these 3. Therefore he has hardly any points to defend up until june

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 8, 2007

Murray hasnt got the physical attributes to be a top ten player he's more suited to the female game

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 8, 2007

Has he announced what his goal for the year is? Surely it has to be at least a passing top 5 place, not a top 10, which he needs to get it in the next 6 months to be confident of finishing the year in the top 10.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 8, 2007

He'll never win a Grand slam !
It's as simple as that

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by StevoJ (U7069295)

posted Jan 8, 2007

The lad can beat Federer! Give him some credit. If he plays on top form and with a bit of luck with the draw, he could win a Grand Slam in the next few years.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 8, 2007

He will have to go on some slump and loss of form not to...its staying there and winning titles that then count.

add comment | complain about this comment

comment by gtaak1 (U3997541)

posted Jan 9, 2007

Yes,Its always a big achievement for a BRITON to reach the top ten,but to be counted as a really great player one has to win at least two Grand Slams.
That's what we should be asking about Murray for the next few years;does he have such potential? and who will be his competitors?

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 9, 2007

Murray is the best young British player for about 50 years (Henman took longer to reach the level Murray is now). Top 10 looks very likely, and given that his game is pretty solid on all surfaces, he could get up to the top 5 or so based on consistency (as with players like Davydenko). Also he has a pretty good record against the guys currently in the top 10, having beaten most of them (other than Nadal and Ljubicic?)
Winning slams? Difficult for a few years given the presence of Federer and Nadal, but AM does still have areas of his game that can improve (serve, overall fitness, possibly bulk up a little bit), so he should not be totally ruled out. I would even say he has an outside chance in Australia coming up; surface suits him and he's in not bad form, having had some match practice already this year.

add comment | complain about this comment

posted Jan 9, 2007

hi twinkles i feel it is slightly to early to begin declaring that AM lacks something in his tennis to truly do well. if one takes Federer as an example he only started to really begin to dominate in 2003 when he won his first grandslam at 22 giving Murray another 2 years to show his quality at least.

add comment | complain about this comment

Comment on this article

Sorry, you can only contribute to 606 during opening hours. These are 0900-2300 UK time, seven days a week, but may vary to accommodate sporting events and UK public holidays.

RATE THIS ARTICLE

Rate Breakdown

  • 5 40.00%
    2 votes
  • 4 40.00%
    2 votes
  • 3
    0 votes
  • 2
    0 votes
  • 1 20.00%
    1 votes

average rating:
3.80 from 5 votes