Pearce to take Distin riskPremiership Manchester City by David McIntyre - BBC Sport (U1628513) 04 December 2006 ![]() Manchester City boss Stuart Pearce is willing to risk losing defender Sylvain Distin for nothing as he tries to persuade him to stay at the club. Latest 10 commentsRead members' comments or add your own
comment by
roj510 (U6279607) posted Dec 4, 2006 If the city board are serious about keeping Distan then they need to put up the money to keep him happy. I am not saying they should pamper to his demands but he is a top defender and needs to be treated as such. If we are serious about keeping all of our top players then we need to make sure they have top contracts. This club is going places if we can keep the likes of Distan, Dunne, Richards, Barton, Vassell & Samaras. It gives us something to build on and that should go hand in hand with us making a serious push for a uefa place...
comment by
kotk59 (U6781714) posted Dec 4, 2006 if he wants to stay great but if not get as much as possible for him in january , we have replacements i richards , onouha , mills etc
comment by
Michael-cfc (U3012220) posted Dec 4, 2006 rumours are, he is joing us (celtic) in the summer
comment by
12barblue(s) (U1683980) posted Dec 4, 2006 If he goes, with all due respect, I don't think it will be to Celtic.
comment by
Michael-cfc (U3012220) posted Dec 4, 2006 im not so sure. i dont think hes at a fashionable enouhg club jsut now, to get a move to a true top side like barca...arsenel..lyon etc etc
comment by
12barblue(s) (U1683980)
comment by
Red Since Munich (1999) ® (U2103243) posted Dec 4, 2006 I think Stewy Pearce has the right attitude. He has to concentrait on trying to keep Citeh in the Prem this season - his team is better with Distin than without him, so why sell him half way through the season. Pearce will be judged by the board of Man City on results, NOT on whether he gets a defender to stay at the Council House. Why should Pearcey be worried about the club losing the £2-4million transfer fee, when, without that player he may lay himself open to being closer to the sack.
comment by
sirchampion (U6780901) posted Dec 4, 2006 Red Since Munich, Man City's season and Pearce's appraisal at the end of the season does not hinge on one player. Distin should be cashed in on if he is reluctant to commit himself to the club.
comment by
amancalledmikey (U1716114) posted Dec 4, 2006 If Distin is the difference between mid table and a relegation dogfight, he's worth a lot more to the club than whatever he'll fetch in a fire sale. Selling a player mid-season in transfer window conditions is short-sighted and I applaud Pearce for taking this view. It's refreshing and continental. People talk about "committing to the club" and "cashing in" but what is more important to any club outside the top four clubs is comfortable Premiership survival. You need to keep a team together for that.
comment by
Mo Howlader (U2442749) posted Dec 5, 2006 to question a players commitment because he doesnt sign an extension is laughable at times. we live in the modern day football where players stay only a few seasons sometimes. Comment on this articleMY RELATED LINKSThe BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites |