Browse: Football Bung inquiryby Mandeep Sanghera - BBC Sport (U1816230) 02 October 2006 ![]() The day started with the scent of blood in the air as Lord Stevens prepared to reveal the findings of his investigation into "alleged irregular transfer payments" in the Premiership. Latest 10 commentsRead members' comments or add your own
comment by
James_ryddel (U5721740) posted Oct 3, 2006 Expecting a flatfoot to finding anything new is a bit of a joke, they usually bungle more or less everything they touch or else codge things together in their notebooks and render any worthwhile evidence useless. I have zero faith in Stevens. All we've had so far is a shoddy smear campaign and leaks to the press. At least Panorama found some evidence that has today been acted upon. I wont be holding my breath for the same outcome post Stevens.
comment by
ytt (U3827774) posted Oct 3, 2006 The FA need to make all dealings transparent. That is clear. The more transparent the transfer process is, the harder it is to get away with corruption. They need to show their teeth for once & follow through with their threats to discipline & take away the licences of any agent who does not co-operate with the Lord Stevens investigation.
comment by
wolf pack (U2146104) posted Oct 3, 2006 This corruption must be stamped out so that it is not repeated.
comment by
desertwalker (U2496067) posted Oct 3, 2006 thanx for deleting my post, even though it wasn't offensive whatsoever
comment by
desertwalker (U2496067)
comment by
mullymully (U4622171) posted Oct 4, 2006 Lets face it, people with far less intelligence than the ones who are involed in the transfer process get away with money laundering and making payments(sweetners) to ensure that business deals go through. So how is this enquiry going to find anything when i am sure that the people involved are going to make sure that their back was well and truely covered from the outset of any deal. posted Oct 4, 2006 unfortunately, those intend on corruption will always get away with it,
comment by
bernsie (U5768400) posted Oct 4, 2006 there has been Comment on this articleMY RELATED LINKSThe BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites |