'No More Women' - 'Round 2: The Office'

Round 2: The Office

After being roundly beaten in Round 1 by the thin comedian (and skinny novelist) Mark Watson, Tim Key is back with a vengeance. The game is No More Women. The rules are self-explanatory. The tension is magnificent. This time they’re playing in the We Need Answers offices during their lunchbreak. I (Alex Horne – in charge of equipment) didn’t get to have any lunch because I had to sort out the microphones. Also Tim is wearing my t-shirt.

From:

No More Women

Published:

7th December 2009

Contributors

Executive Producer: Will Saunders
Graphic Designer: Iain Armstrong
Producer: Lucy McDermott
Performer: Mark Watson
Performer: Tim Key
Commentator: Alex Horne
Assistant Producer: Alex Horne

Comments

New users: after you have set up your account, you will still be unauthorised to comment until you have validated your email address and then accepted the house rules by clicking the link below, "you are not authorised to comment here".

Comments

This entry is now closed for comments

Jump to comments pagination

All Comments 4

- Order by:
- Latest First
- Highest Rated
- Lowest Rated
rate this
0

rate this
0

Comment number 4.
Patch
9th June 2010 - 2:40

The Bizzle is a sportsman

Report this comment (Comment number 4)

Link to this (Comment number 4)
rate this
0

rate this
0

Comment number 3.
phippster
18th February 2010 - 19:47

If Tim is wearing your t-shirt what are you wearing? Don't get clever with me, lad.

Report this comment (Comment number 3)

Link to this (Comment number 3)
rate this
0

rate this
0

Comment number 2.
sllimwerdna
6th January 2010 - 15:42

This may sound slightly nerdy but this game illustrates a point of interest in the Philosophy of Language. Technically 'The Queen' violates Mark's first law because The Queen's real name is Elizabeth Windsor (longer first name than surname), and appealing to Frege's argument in Naming and Necessity, 'Elizabeth Windsor' necessarily designates Elizabeth Windsor, whereas 'The Queen' designates anyone who happens to be The Queen at that moment in time, therefore to properly refer to Elizabeth Windsor one must say 'Elizabeth Windsor' and not 'The Queen'. However should one argue that the Queen is currently Elizabeth Windsor and thus by virtue of referencing The Queen at this point in time, you are really referencing Elizabeth Windsor (referencing her per accidens (coincidence/luck) rather than per se) whose first name is longer than her last. In other words, Mark you should have challenged 'The Queen', you had every right to do so.

Correction: Tim, you should have challenged 'The Queen'.

Report this comment (Comment number 2)

Link to this (Comment number 2)
rate this
0

rate this
0

Comment number 1.
sllimwerdna
6th January 2010 - 15:40

This may sound slightly nerdy but this game illustrates a point of interest in the Philosophy of Language. Technically 'The Queen' violates Mark's first law because The Queen's real name is Elizabeth Windsor (longer first name than surname), and appealing to Frege's argument in Naming and Necessity, 'Elizabeth Windsor' necessarily designates Elizabeth Windsor, whereas 'The Queen' designates anyone who happens to be The Queen at that moment in time, therefore to properly refer to Elizabeth Windsor one must say 'Elizabeth Windsor' and not 'The Queen'. However should one argue that the Queen is currently Elizabeth Windsor and thus by virtue of referencing The Queen at this point in time, you are really referencing Elizabeth Windsor (referencing her per accidens (coincidence/luck) rather than per se) whose first name is longer than her last. In other words, Mark you should have challenged 'The Queen', you had every right to do so.

Report this comment (Comment number 1)

Link to this (Comment number 1)