|
Dreading dreadlocks
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BBC Caribbean has been reporting that, in the Bahamas, two customs employees are facing the threat of dismissal because of
their hairstyle.
Their dreadlocks have been deemed "unacceptable" by Customs authorities, who insist that the rules and regulations as they apply back that position. The two women have been cautioned. The letter they received on the matter made it clear that the authorities felt that wearing their braids and dreadlocks on the job is "unquestionably unacceptable". The official line is that their jobs fall within the category of national security, and that there are various codes, including dress, that they are required to adhere to. The two are seeking legal advice on the matter. But their plight is one many rastafarians around the Caribbean can identify with. WHAT DO YOU THINK?
HAVE YOUR SAY
It is a sad day when black people are castigated for wearing their hair naturally in a country that has a large black population.
When will we love our "nappy" hair, large noses and full lips? When will we adore our chocolate coloured skins and thank
God that we do not have to spend hours in the sun to achieve it? There is nothing wrong with wearing locks to work if they
are clean and tidy and I am appalled that in the year 2009 employers can be so narrow minded. Black people need to wake up,
love themselves and be emancipated from mental slavery. When my wife locked her hair she created a stir at the secondary school she taught at. However, others have followed since
then and it is a common trend in Jamaica now - but not accepted in certain professions. 1. Stop the discrimination 2. Get a clue about fashion This is nonsense. No one can tell you how to wear your hair regardless of the work you are doing. As long as the hair is
neat and in order there shouldn't even be a debate. Ladies if I were you I would go to the Labour Department and make an
example of that supervisor. Customs authorities need to get a grip on reality - this is a culture jibe. As long as it is tied back as so not to cause
injury or get trapped (it should be fine). I have no problem with anyone who carries dreadlocks. I think that the important thing is how one performs at the job. I
know that one has to be attired neatly but if the dreadlocks of those women are combed neatly and (dreadlocks) don't pose
any danger to their clients, I suggest that they should be left alone. There are more important things to worry about, such
as the drug trafficking issue. Gentle folks, to many rastas, dreadlocks is not a "hairstyle" but a conscious application of their faith. If the women are
rastas, then they should sue, if not they then should comply. As anything else I would expect order in employee turnout. By this I mean the way in which one would present themselves; neatly,
sharply and properly. However, I don't think one's hair has anything to do with their ability to do the task. It's pure
discrimination against a certain culture/custom in most cases, which I find totally unfair. Sadly, this is a major problem
in Caribbean societies today due to the common stereotype of negative affiliations in the rastafarian community. As long
as the dreadlocks are properly cared for and tucked up neatly into a ponytail, that should be fine. It has to look presentable
because employers are looking to project a positive image of their business and what it represents. Dreadlocks have become
a more popular hair style these days. Men and women have their part to play in adhering to guidelines as pertains to work
dress codes. That's the bottom line. I think that they should not be fired. I thought that we were over all this discrimination, apparently not. Absolute nonsense. The provision to which the Customs Dept refer reads as follows: "Hairstyles must be neat & suitable for
the job. Such hairstyles must allow for the proper wearing of caps. Braids and other hairstyles must not be worn while on
duty." Gentle folks, to many rastas, dreadlocks is not a "hairstyle" but a conscious application of their faith. If the women are
rastas, then they should sue, if not they then should comply. I have no problem with anyone who carries dreadlocks. I think that the important thing is how one performs at the job. I know
that one has to be attired neatly, but if the dreadlocks of those women are combed neatly and (dreadlocks) don't pose any
danger to their clients, I suggest that they should be left alone. They are more important things to worry about, such as
the drug trafficking issue. Customs authorities need to get a grip on reality. This is a culture jibe. (It’s OK) as long as it is tied back as so not
to cause injury or get trapped in the odd carousel. This is nonsense. No one can tell you how to wear your hair regardless of the work you are doing. They can tell you not to
wear certain colours that might distract from the work you are doing but they can't tell you have to wear it. As long as the
hair is neat and in order there shouldn't even be a debate. When my wife locked her hair she created a stir at the secondary school she taught at. However, other have followed since
then and it is a common trend in Jamaica now - but not accepted in certain professions. It is a sad day when black people are castigated for wearing their hair naturally in a country that has a large black population.
When will we love our "nappy" hair, large noses and full lips? When will we adore our chocolate coloured skins and thank
God that we do not have to spend hours in the sun to achieve it? There is nothing wrong with wearing locks to work if they
are clean and tidy, and I am appalled that in the year 2009 employers can be so narrow minded. Black people need to wake up,
love themselves and be emancipated from mental slavery. I am a white tourist who frequently travels the Caribbean. What I see as important is the welcome given to guests and that
staff are good and efficient at what they do. In my opinion these two women should be left alone with their hairstyles. Let
get real here, THERE IS A GLOBAL CRISIS, tourism has gone down! The controller should turn his/her attention to the more important
things like catching drug traffickers. What an archaic and discriminatory code. How about banning painted nails and earrings while we are at it? Oh, and you better
remove that cross pendant. It is about time we see people for who they are and not for the colour of their skin, hairstyle or what have you. I'm no rastafarian
but I strongly represent many of the principles on which it stands for. This is the problem the world faces today, it is
either that we don't know how to unite as a people or we don't wish to unite as a people, forgetting all race, creed, nationality
and all those other things we use as an excuse to rationalize & victimize our people. So with little words of advise whether
the dreadlocks were associated with your religion or just plain old fashion, continue to do the things which you regard as
right because at the end of it all, you should be able to say I did what I know was right. This is no surprise. It is rampant all over the Caribbean. In fact, I am sure this discrimination is meted out to these individuals
by fellow blacks. This is uniquely a Caribbean problem. For some reason or another it is this type of skepticism that holds
up progress of the CSME, that make we feel we are better than African in the ACP, that make we feel we have to wear a suit
in the tropics, and I can go on....who determines what an acceptable hairstyle is or should be. And, if it is an organizational
rule, spell it out in the contract of employment, then check it against your discrimination laws if you have any. Even if
it is policy as distinct from law, then make it clear. Caribbean identity is fading and while the developed nations who have
more experience in dealing with the world and modernizing even cultural practices, we in the Caribbean are fighting to kill
part of what we perceive is unacceptable to whom? Ourselves. Come one. We refuse MENTALLY to move beyond 1834. These countries unfortunately are more colonial than the colonialists. This is what’s dividing the people and the counties
in the Caribbean. I am Jamaican and if these custom officers wear the locks tidy and presentable, then what is the fuss. I am Jamaican and live and work in the BVI. This does not surprise me. I think dreadlocks do represent a sense of identity, those who wear them should be respected for their beliefs as long as
they perform their duties accordingly. Absolute nonsense. The provision to which the Customs Department refers reads as follows: "Hairstyles must be neat and suitable
for the job. Such hairstyles must allow for the proper wearing of caps. Braids and other hairstyles must not be worn while
on duty." These countries unfortunately are more colonial than the colonialists. This is what is dividing the people and the countries
in the Caribbean. I am Jamaican and if these customs officers wear the locks tidy and presentable then what is the fuss. It is about time we see people for who they are and not for the colour of their skin, hairstyle or what have you. I'm no rastafarian
but I strongly represent many of the principles which the rastafarian movement stands for. This is the problem the world
faces today, it is either that we don't know how to unite as a people or we don't wish to unite as a people. What an archaic and discriminatory code. How about banning painted nails and earrings while we are at it? Oh and you better
remove that cross pendant. I am a white tourist who frequently travels the Caribbean. What I see as important is the welcome given to guests and that
staff are good and efficient at what they do. In my opinion these two women should be left alone with their hairstyles.
Let's get real here, THERE IS A GLOBAL CRISIS, tourism has gone down! The comptroller (of Customs)should turn his/her attention
to the more important things like catching drugs traffickers. Every time this issue comes up it gets my blood boiling and the reason is that the same public officials who seek to prevent
these people from wearing their hair in dreadlocks are the same ones who have no problem employing persons of other ethnic
and religious backgrounds… This to me demonstrates that in certain segments of our populace we may be free from the chains
of slavery but are still mentally shackled to our colonial past. I live in the U.S and there is not a single public office
these days in which some person (s) wearing their hair in a dreadlock style having no religious reason for doing so. However,
in the Caribbean - the birth place of Rastafarianism - you risk losing you job for doing so. How ironic. When I was a youngster
it was not unusual for Natty to get a beating from the cops just because of his crown. Are these ladies effective at their jobs? If yes, then obviously the hair is not a problem. Unless their hair is wild and
is impeding the quality work they do, then leave them already. First of all dreadlocks is not just acceptable in the Caribbean but worldwide among all peoples. It represents identity, plus
to some it’s also religious. I think the customs have over-reacted. I also do think that this code is outdated and should
be re-examined. There is also a hint of discrimination in this whole affair. For those persons who keep purporting here that every organisation has its rules, may I remind you that it was once a universal
institutional rule that "Black people be disallowed from certain buses, schools, offices, playgrounds etc. etc . . . may I
continue. As a rule in England it is unacceptable for a defendant to come before the court in head dress (hats, tams, berets,
caps etc) but Rastas are allowed their head dress in court as a recognised religious wear. So there are rules and there are
exceptions to and exemption from rules - and this is England in the 21st Century making this exception for Rastas. Now, did
you just tell me that a Caribbean island is discriminating against someone with braided or locked hair holding a particular
job and some folks are defending this as acceptable? Was this happening to Black people in America or Europe we would be screaming
discrimination! "Black is beautiful" - do you know how many people have given up their lives and die so that we can live this
expression "Black is beautiful?" Wake up Bahamas! Given that dreadlocks do not grow overnight, these women most likely would have had their hairstyles before they were employed.
Even if they did not, if wearing dreadlocks was not set out as a no-no in their employment contracts then this is a case of
discrimination. Perhaps, as we say in Guyana, there is more in the mortar besides the pestle. The women should pursue the
matter. My hair style is dreadlocks and I'm gainfully employed as a Registered Nurse with no problem. It is not only acceptable, but should be encouraged as a celebration of our identity and unique culture. Fitzgerald Hinds a former government minister in Trinidad also wore dreadlocks and it was not a problem. Hinds is also a lawyer
maybe they should seek his advice on the matter. Rules are rules. Please obey. What do their hairstyles have to do with their behaviour and professionalism on the job? What hairstyle should they replace
it with - straightened hair, which was developed to look more like that of whites? This sounds like discrimination against
"blackness". I don't have dreadlocks, but my hair is natural and always plaited. I would never stand for anyone telling me
to change my hairstyle because of the racist, colonial mentality, that what's natural for black people is somehow "unacceptable". I have personally met both of the officers concerned who are my colleagues, and submit that there is too much fuss about
nothing. In my opinion the hair styles are simple braids which could be considered either the "twist" or the "bud", but none
of them can be rightfully considered "dread locks". What is most amazing is that the instruction given by the Comptroller
of Customs is that officers should not wear any form of braid among which is the dreadlocks. If the instruction is to be
adhered to then a very large majority of the female officers would be in violation of the Comptroller of Custom's instruction.
If one really wants to see an officer wearing dreadlocks then they ought to pay a visit to the United States Customs pre-clearance
area in Nassau, and observe one of their Afro American officers when he is on duty in full uniform sporting his dreadlocks. This shows up the contradictions that continue to plague Caribbean peoples. How can you celebrate Bob Marley on the one hand
and then have a discriminatory policy like that on the other hand. As a retired and trained customs officer, (I think) circumstances should determine their dismissal or retention. If the dress
code was in place before these officers began wearing dreadlocks, they will have to bear the consequences. If not, they
should continue serving the public, especially if they are responsible and accountable Officers. How ridiculous! I suppose if they were wearing a weave - which Nina Simone once pertinently described as some "dead white
person's hair on their head ... we are the only people in the world who don't love ourselves" - that would have been acceptable!
This is a fine example of the backwardness and supine neo-colonised mentality of our ruling creole elites. Every organisation has its own rules and regulations. If it states in its dress code that dreadlocks are not allowed then
one should abide by the rule. Now if that rule is not documented then that raises another issue. However if the dreadlocks/braids
are neat, clean, and the women are competent in doing their jobs, I see no problem with the issue. Also who decides which
hairstyle is "more acceptable"? This appears to be a holdover from the "white" Colonisation era. Please can we all enter the 21st century on one accord...content
of character is the only thing that matters. It is no strange news to me. The Caribbean is a region that seeks its identity from outside its borders. We are still in
a period when it is an asset to have a foreign accent, caucasian skin colour and relaxed/straightened hair to be competitive. It seems like some of the authorities need to get with the programme and realise that locks and braids are acceptable hair
style. It makes me wonder what next they would be against. Thank God I now live in the UK where one is not judged by one's
hair style. After spending most of my summers since birth in Jamaica I only recently came to realise just how prejudicial they are about
appearance. By appearance I mean not just hair style, but also skin colour. For some "dreadlocks" or "locks" as I know them,
are a political, religious and fashion statement. I think that as long as the locks are neat and pulled back away from the face it should be ok. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||