|
Endearment...on whose terms?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The US presidential contender Barack Obama has been given a timely reminder that everything he says is open to public scrutiny.
A brief exchange with a reporter has triggered a new debate over what to say and what not to say depending on the circumstances. Touring a car factory in Detroit, Senator Obama was asked by a television news reporter what his plans were for American auto-workers. His response in part was: "Hold on a second sweetie..." That sparked a wave of reaction, from suggestions that he had overstepped his mark, was rude, sexist, disrespectful and politically incorrect. That was from those who felt the remark was out-of-place. Some other people say it's been much ado about nothing.
However Senator Obama apologised.
Sweetie, Darling, Love, Luv, Doodoo, Dushi, Honey, Babes, Baby are commonly used greetings in the Caribbean, largely by men to women - but also by women to men. But, we ask, are such 'terms of endearment' out-of-place in today's world? Are they too suggestive and even impolite? Have they become politically incorrect?
Have your say
I can understand both points for and against the use of such terms. Depending on the individual it's coming from it could
be genuine or not. How it's said and the circumstances should determine someone’s response. I don't think that it's wrong
or politically incorrect but I do believe that there's an appropriate time for everything. I feel that the whole thing was taken out of context. ´Sweetie´ doesn’t necessarily pertain to anything sexual, but using
the term with a stranger can soften communication and give a conversation a more affectionate tone. To me, this demonstrates
that Senator Obama actually has a soul, and can connect with the public. Americans first of all have huge problems with ``invasion
of personal space.´´ Their culture is more individualistic rather than community-based. Hence, with casual acquaintances,
Americans tend to feel uncomfortable exchanging affectionate words, or giving an acquaintance a hug, for example. It’s all
very suppressive if you ask me. Praise Jah Senator Obama seems to be different! I am assuming the people who found the remark 'offensive' have other more pressing issues in their lives. Let us remember
there are a lot more pressing issues in the world than taking offense to such a remark. Those people who took offense have
too much time on their hands! My Lord! What’s the fuss about? I refer to almost everyone I know as sweetie, honey, babes and darling, especially if I
can’t remember the person's name. And believe me, I mean no disrespect! What's the big deal? It's my way of being friendly,
and being from the Caribbean, I just happen to be a very friendly person. I don't think Mr Obama's comments are acceptable in the circumstances in which they were used. The point is, he wouldn't have
called a man sweetie and that makes it derogatory and sexist. I have had to deal with these sorts of references in my professional
life as well. If a friend calls you sweetie or uses a term of endearment that is okay but it is never okay anywhere else. I think the whole thing is ridiculous. People in this country take everything too serious, and it's as though the reporters
have nothing better to do than to make mountains out of mole hills. The question did Sen. Obama hold her hand tenderly and
say "hold on a second sweetie"? If it were me, I'd be tickled to death. At least he was not rude about it. Like the saying
goes “only in America.” I'm from the Caribbean and I call people sweetie and honey all the time. I agree with Dave from New Zealand. I could not have said it any better. We need to lighten up. And for those of you who think
Obama's response was politically incorrect, you are not really from the Caribbean. Does the world need to take issue with every inconsequential utterance voiced by everyone? Give me a break! I also would have laughed if addressed ‘Sweetie’ by Mr. Obama. Anyway – do the English still address others ‘Hello Luv’?
Nothing wrong with that either. In this highly ‘sexualised’ world that we live in – some terms when used, tend to remove
stings or lighten a potentially volatile situation. My mom refers most many persons as ‘sweetheart’, or she might say ‘oh
never mind my honey’. I agree with Vesta of Jamaica. These terms are relative in nature and would have a different meaning to everyone. So it does
depend on how and where they are used. I am a Caribbean national and we in the Caribbean usually use these terms especially if you respect someone and would like
them to know that you have nothing but kindness, caring, respect and love for them. All this in my opinion is just politics
and nothing else. If he had call her by another word like what is presently being use by most black Americans and those in
the rap world, it would have been another thing. But sweetie, love, madame, ma'am it is all good. We in the Caribbean should
not get involve in such petty issues. This word is better than what we are presently fighting to prevent our youths from using
and it is what we should encourage our youths to use instead of the B...., Wh... and the like. My experience with countries that where once British colonies is filled with 1 million spoken and unspoken rules. Methinks
thou doth protest too much. Criticism of this is ridiculous. Critics are out of weapons when this obvious colloquial graciousness is turned into a campaign
issue. Ridiculous. Anything is better than Dude, Dawg or Yaul! I'm a guy and I'll take any "Sweety", "Dahling" and "Baby" from anyone whose sole
purpose is to greet me, even if it comes from another guy! Some people just don't know where else to find ways and places
to drop their divisive messages and intentions. I think this is another example of us losing parts of ourselves. Some may argue that this is a part we can do without but
nonetheless it is those little bits that are summed up to make us who we are. I would hate to see the Caribbean folk become
like everyone else. As a Caribbean man I have no qualms with such terms. I wonder if our ladies do. I have been away form home for quite a few years now. Maybe before I thought to take offense to being called "Doodo" "Babe"
"Sweetie" or any name other than that which is on my B-Cert (birth certificate). Once consciousness came so did disgust with
being addressed in any of the above terms. These greetings are used every day, even I use them but the thing is you have to know who you're addressing. The person you're
addressing must be someone you know, a co-worker, a friend but please not with a complete stranger. I think that it's all in the tone of the remark, but from this woman's point of view if we're not related or close friends,
I won't take to kindly any man referring to me as Sweetie or Babes. I think it's disrespectful. I see or hear nothing wrong in using these terms. They are usually a sign that you and a person are on the same wavelength
and are communicating well. It seems that some people are so taken up with being "perfect" in today’s political world that
they want to change our very own way of life and cultural norms. Is it a crime to be yourself and allow people to see the
REAL you? The comment is not at all offensive. In the West Indies where I come from those words are common vernacular greetings. I don't find the comment offensive at all. We would have ten thousand apologies an hour for every time that phrase is said during a normal working day. Greg A Caribbean leader (name given) was on a walk-about during which he (it was a he) entered a store and began chatting with
one of the customer service attendants. These terms are generally received in good faith around the Caribbean. However, they are usually not accetpable in professional life. These terms can be distasteful depending on when, where or how used. In this case it was used very casually, hence I would not consider it to be offensive. Vesta |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||